Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix TestFolder check file #407

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2024
Merged

fix TestFolder check file #407

merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2024

Conversation

tty47
Copy link
Contributor

@tty47 tty47 commented May 30, 2024

hello!

This one fixes the issues with the test, adding the file to check

closes: #382

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced file management in test scenarios by adding the ability to add files to specific paths.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error handling when adding files to ensure smoother operation during tests.

@tty47 tty47 requested a review from a team May 30, 2024 08:38
@tty47 tty47 self-assigned this May 30, 2024
@tty47 tty47 added bug Something isn't working fix Fix labels May 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The folder_test.go file has been updated to include a new function call AddFile to the web instance. This function adds a file to a specific path and includes error handling to manage potential issues. This enhancement improves file management within the test scenario, addressing issues with incorrect assertions.

Changes

Files Change Summary
e2e/basic/folder_test.go Added AddFile function call to web instance, updated error handling for file addition.

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Tester
    participant WebInstance
    participant FileSystem

    Tester->>WebInstance: Call AddFile(path, content)
    WebInstance->>FileSystem: Add file to path
    FileSystem-->>WebInstance: File added successfully
    WebInstance-->>Tester: Return success or error
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Correct assertion in TestFolder (#382)

Poem

In code's vast land, a change so bright,
A file is added, now set right.
Errors handled, tests now pass,
No more failures, clear as glass.
A rabbit's joy, in bytes we trust,
Code refined, as it must.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fc126f1 and b2b17c7.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • e2e/basic/folder_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
e2e/basic/folder_test.go (2)

22-25: The error handling for AddFile is appropriate and follows best practices.


22-25: Ensure the AddFile method is used correctly.

Verification successful

The AddFile method is used correctly in the test file, and the error handling is consistent with other usages across the codebase.

  • pkg/instance/instance.go: Method signature matches the usage in the test file.
  • e2e/basic/folder_test.go: Usage is consistent with other test files.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the `AddFile` method signature and usage in other parts of the codebase.

# Test: Search for the `AddFile` method usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase.
rg --type go $'AddFile'

Length of output: 2441

Copy link
Contributor

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@tty47 tty47 added this pull request to the merge queue May 30, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 32b98ab May 30, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@tty47 tty47 deleted the jose/fixTestFolder branch May 30, 2024 10:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working fix Fix
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TestFolder often fails due to not correct assertion
3 participants