chore: group instance methods #533
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the architecture for managing container instances within a Kubernetes environment. Key modifications include the introduction of specialized structs for
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (22)
pkg/instance/proxy.go (2)
13-30: Incomplete Transition fromInstancetonetworkThe transition from
Instancetonetworkis not fully complete. There are still multiple references toInstanceacross various files in the codebase. Please update all references toInstancetonetworkwhere applicable to ensure consistency and avoid potential issues.
- Files with remaining
Instancereferences:
pkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.gopkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper.gopkg/sidecars/observability/obsy.gopkg/instance/security.gopkg/instance/sidecars.gopkg/instance/storage.gopkg/instance/monitoring.gopkg/instance/network.gopkg/instance/build.gopkg/instance/resources.gopkg/instance/execution.gopkg/instance/state.gopkg/instance/instance.gopkg/knuu/instance_old.gopkg/knuu/knuu.goe2e/executor.goe2e/system/env_to_json_test.goe2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.goe2e/system/start_callback_test.goe2e/system/suite_setup_test.goe2e/system/folder_test.goe2e/basic/basic_test.goe2e/basic/probe_test.goe2e/basic/observability_test.goe2e/system/folder_test_image_cached_test.goe2e/system/file_test.goe2e/system/external_file_test.goe2e/system/build_from_git_test.goe2e/tshark/tshark_test.goe2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.goe2e/basic/rbac_test.goe2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.goAnalysis chain
LGTM! But verify the usage of the new receiver type.
The method
AddHosthas been correctly updated to use thenetworkreceiver. Ensure that all references toInstancehave been updated tonetworkthroughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `Instance` have been updated to `network`. # Test: Search for the usage of `Instance` and ensure it has been replaced with `network`. rg --type go -A 5 $'Instance'Length of output: 129223
Update Required: References to
InstanceNot Fully UpdatedThe method
AddHostWithReadyCheckhas been correctly updated to use thenetworkreceiver. However, there are still multiple references toInstanceacross various files that need to be updated tonetwork.Please update the following references:
e2e/executor.go
- Line 1:
func (e *Executor) NewInstance(ctx context.Context, name string) (*instance.Instance, error)- Line 2:
i, err := e.Kn.NewInstance(name)pkg/knuu/instance_old.go
- Line 1:
type Instance struct {- Line 2:
instance.Instance- Line 3:
*Instance- Line 4:
type InstanceState instance.InstanceState- Line 5:
const (- Line 6:
None InstanceState = iota- Line 7:
Preparing- Line 8:
Committed- Line 9:
Started- Line 10:
Stopped- Line 11:
Destroyed- Line 12:
func NewInstance(name string) (*Instance, error) {- Line 13:
i, err := tmpKnuu.NewInstance(name)- Line 14:
return &Instance{*i}, nil- Line 15:
func (i *Instance) SetImage(image string) error {- Line 16:
return i.Instance.Build().SetImage(ctx, image)- Line 17:
func (i *Instance) SetGitRepo(ctx context.Context, gitContext builder.GitContext) error {- Line 18:
return i.Instance.Build().SetGitRepo(ctx, gitContext)- Line 19:
func (i *Instance) SetImageInstant(image string) error {- Line 20:
return i.Instance.Build().SetImageInstant(ctx, image)- Line 21:
func (i *Instance) SetCommand(command ...string) error {- Line 22:
return i.Instance.Build().SetCommand(command...)- Line 23:
func (i *Instance) SetArgs(args ...string) error {- Line 24:
return i.Instance.Build().SetArgs(args...)- Line 25:
func (i *Instance) AddPortTCP(port int) error {- Line 26:
return i.Instance.Network().AddPortTCP(port)- Line 27:
func (i *Instance) PortForwardTCP(port int) (int, error) {- Line 28:
return i.Instance.Network().PortForwardTCP(ctx, port)- Line 29:
func (i *Instance) AddPortUDP(port int) error {- Line 30:
return i.Instance.Network().AddPortUDP(port)- Line 31:
func (i *Instance) ExecuteCommand(command ...string) (string, error) {- Line 32:
return i.Instance.Execution().ExecuteCommand(ctx, command...)- Line 33:
func (i *Instance) ExecuteCommandWithContext(ctx context.Context, command ...string) (string, error) {- Line 34:
return i.Instance.Execution().ExecuteCommand(ctx, command...)- Line 35:
func (i *Instance) AddFile(srcPath, dstPath string, chown string) error {- Line 36:
return i.Instance.Storage().AddFile(srcPath, dstPath, chown)- Line 37:
func (i *Instance) AddFolder(srcPath, dstPath string, chown string) error {- Line 38:
return i.Instance.Storage().AddFolder(srcPath, dstPath, chown)- Line 39:
func (i *Instance) AddFileBytes(bytes []byte, dest string, chown string) error {- Line 40:
return i.Instance.Storage().AddFileBytes(bytes, dest, chown)- Line 41:
func (i *Instance) SetUser(user string) error {- Line 42:
return i.Instance.Build().SetUser(user)- Line 43:
func (i *Instance) Commit() error {- Line 44:
return i.Instance.Build().Commit()- Line 45:
func (i *Instance) AddVolume(path, size string) error {- Line 46:
return i.Instance.Storage().AddVolume(path, resource.MustParse(size))- Line 47:
func (i *Instance) AddVolumeWithOwner(path, size string, owner int64) error {- Line 48:
return i.Instance.Storage().AddVolumeWithOwner(path, resource.MustParse(size), owner)- Line 49:
func (i *Instance) SetMemory(request, limit string) error {- Line 50:
return i.Instance.Resources().SetMemory(resource.MustParse(request), resource.MustParse(limit))- Line 51:
func (i *Instance) SetCPU(request string) error {- Line 52:
return i.Instance.Resources().SetCPU(resource.MustParse(request))- Line 53:
func (i *Instance) SetEnvironmentVariable(key, value string) error {- Line 54:
return i.Instance.Build().SetEnvironmentVariable(key, value)- Line 55:
func (i *Instance) GetIP() (string, error) {- Line 56:
return i.Instance.Network().GetIP(ctx)- Line 57:
func (i *Instance) GetFileBytes(file string) ([]byte, error) {- Line 58:
return i.Instance.Storage().GetFileBytes(ctx, file)- Line 59:
func (i *Instance) ReadFileFromRunningInstance(ctx context.Context, filePath string) (io.ReadCloser, error) {- Line 60:
return i.Instance.Storage().ReadFileFromRunningInstance(ctx, filePath)- Line 61:
func (i *Instance) AddPolicyRule(rule rbacv1.PolicyRule) error {- Line 62:
return i.Instance.Resources().AddPolicyRule(rule)- Line 63:
func (i *Instance) SetLivenessProbe(livenessProbe *v1.Probe) error {- Line 64:
return i.Instance.Monitoring().SetLivenessProbe(livenessProbe)- Line 65:
func (i *Instance) SetReadinessProbe(readinessProbe *v1.Probe) error {- Line 66:
return i.Instance.Monitoring().SetReadinessProbe(readinessProbe)- Line 67:
func (i *Instance) SetStartupProbe(startupProbe *v1.Probe) error {- Line 68:
return i.Instance.Monitoring().SetStartupProbe(startupProbe)- Line 69:
func (i *Instance) AddSidecar(ctx context.Context, sc instance.SidecarManager) error {- Line 70:
return i.Instance.Sidecars().Add(ctx, sc)- Line 71:
func (i *Instance) SetPrivileged(privileged bool) error {- Line 72:
return i.Instance.Security().SetPrivileged(privileged)- Line 73:
func (i *Instance) AddCapability(capability string) error {- Line 74:
return i.Instance.Security().AddCapability(capability)- Line 75:
func (i *Instance) AddCapabilities(capabilities []string) error {- Line 76:
return i.Instance.Security().AddCapabilities(capabilities)- Line 77:
func (i *Instance) StartAsync() error {- Line 78:
return i.Instance.Execution().StartAsync(ctx)- Line 79:
func (i *Instance) StartWithoutWait() error {- Line 80:
return i.Instance.Execution().StartAsync(ctx)- Line 81:
func (i *Instance) Start() error {- Line 82:
return i.Instance.Execution().Start(ctx)- Line 83:
func (i *Instance) IsRunning() (bool, error) {- Line 84:
return i.Instance.Execution().IsRunning(ctx)- Line 85:
func (i *Instance) WaitInstanceIsRunning() error {- Line 86:
return i.Instance.Execution().WaitInstanceIsRunning(ctx)- Line 87:
func (i *Instance) DisableNetwork() error {- Line 88:
return i.Instance.Network().Disable(ctx)- Line 89:
func (i *Instance) EnableNetwork() error {- Line 90:
return i.Instance.Network().Enable(ctx)- Line 91:
func (i *Instance) NetworkIsDisabled() (bool, error) {- Line 92:
return i.Instance.Network().IsDisabled(ctx)- Line 93:
func (i *Instance) WaitInstanceIsStopped() error {- Line 94:
return i.Instance.Execution().WaitInstanceIsStopped(ctx)- Line 95:
func (i *Instance) Stop() error {- Line 96:
return i.Instance.Execution().Stop(ctx)- Line 97:
func (i *Instance) Clone() (*Instance, error) {- Line 98:
newInst, err := i.Instance.Clone()- Line 99:
return &Instance{Instance: *newInst}, nil- Line 100:
func (i *Instance) CloneWithName(name string) (*Instance, error) {- Line 101:
newInst, err := i.Instance.CloneWithName(name)- Line 102:
return &Instance{*newInst}, nil- Line 103:
func (i *Instance) CreateCustomResource(gvr *schema.GroupVersionResource, obj *map[string]interface{}) error {- Line 104:
return i.Instance.Resources().CreateCustomResource(ctx, gvr, obj)- Line 105:
func (i *Instance) CustomResourceDefinitionExists(gvr *schema.GroupVersionResource) (bool, error) {- Line 106:
return i.Instance.Resources().CustomResourceDefinitionExists(ctx, gvr)- Line 107:
func (i *Instance) Destroy() error {- Line 108:
return i.Instance.Execution().Destroy(ctx)- Line 109:
func BatchDestroy(instances ...*Instance) error {- Line 110:
ins := make([]*instance.Instance, len(instances))- Line 111:
for i, instance := range instances {- Line 112:
ins[i] = &instance.Instance- Line 113:
return instance.BatchDestroy(ctx, ins...)- Line 114:
func (i *Instance) Labels() map[string]string {- Line 115:
return i.Instance.Execution().Labels()- Line 116:
func (i *Instance) IsInState(states ...InstanceState) bool {- Line 117:
statesNew := make([]instance.InstanceState, len(states))- Line 118:
for i, state := range states {- Line 119:
statesNew[i] = instance.InstanceState(state)- Line 120:
return i.Instance.IsInState(statesNew...)- Line 121:
func (i *Instance) AddHost(port int) (err error, host string) {- Line 122:
host, err = i.Instance.Network().AddHost(ctx, port)- Line 123:
return err, hostPlease ensure these references are updated accordingly.
Analysis chain
Line range hint
37-62:
LGTM! But verify the usage of the new receiver type.The method
AddHostWithReadyCheckhas been correctly updated to use thenetworkreceiver. Ensure that all references toInstancehave been updated tonetworkthroughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `Instance` have been updated to `network`. # Test: Search for the usage of `Instance` and ensure it has been replaced with `network`. rg --type go -A 5 $'Instance'Length of output: 129223
e2e/system/external_file_test.go (2)
59-59: Update Required: Instances ofExecuteCommandnot updatedThe following instances of
ExecuteCommandhave not been updated to use theExecutioncomponent. Please update these references toExecution().ExecuteCommand:
e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go: err := ins.Build().ExecuteCommand("mkdir", "-p", nginxHTMLPath)e2e/basic/probe_test.go: _, err = web.ExecuteCommand("mkdir", "-p", "/usr/share/nginx/html")e2e/basic/rbac_test.go: _, err = instance.ExecuteCommand("kubectl", "get", "pods")e2e/basic/rbac_test.go: exitCode, err = instance.ExecuteCommand("echo", "$?")pkg/knuu/instance_old.go: func (i *Instance) ExecuteCommand(command ...string) (string, error)pkg/knuu/instance_old.go: func (i *Instance) ExecuteCommandWithContext(ctx context.Context, command ...string) (string, error)pkg/instance/build.go: func (b *build) ExecuteCommand(command ...string) errorPlease ensure these references are updated to maintain consistency and correctness in the codebase.
Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify the usage of the new
Executioncomponent.The method call
executor.Execution().ExecuteCommandcorrectly references theExecutioncomponent. Ensure that all references to command execution have been updated to use theExecutioncomponent throughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to command execution have been updated to use the `Execution` component. # Test: Search for the usage of `ExecuteCommand` and ensure it has been replaced with `Execution().ExecuteCommand`. rg --type go -A 5 $'ExecuteCommand'Length of output: 14162
41-41: Update required: Use theStoragecomponent for file managementThe
AddFilemethod should be updated to use theStoragecomponent for consistency and proper encapsulation. The following instances need to be updated:
e2e/basic/probe_test.go:
- Line:
err = web.AddFile("../system/resources/html/index.html", "/usr/share/nginx/html/index.html", "0:0")e2e/basic/observability_test.go:
- Line:
require.NoError(t, prometheus.AddFileBytes([]byte(prometheusConfigContent), prometheusConfig, "0:0"))Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify the usage of the new
Storagecomponent.The method call
server.Storage().AddFilecorrectly references theStoragecomponent. Ensure that all references to file management have been updated to use theStoragecomponent throughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to file management have been updated to use the `Storage` component. # Test: Search for the usage of `AddFile` and ensure it has been replaced with `Storage().AddFile`. rg --type go -A 5 $'AddFile'Length of output: 6880
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the context of `AddFile` usage in specific files to verify if they should be updated to use the `Storage` component. # Test: Display lines around `AddFile` usage in `e2e/basic/probe_test.go` rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'AddFile' e2e/basic/probe_test.go # Test: Display lines around `AddFile` usage in `e2e/basic/observability_test.go` rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'AddFile' e2e/basic/observability_test.goLength of output: 1440
e2e/system/folder_test_image_cached_test.go (1)
62-62: Ensure all instances ofExecuteCommandare updated to useExecution().ExecuteCommand.While the majority of the codebase has been updated to use the
Execution().ExecuteCommandpattern, there are still some instances of the oldExecuteCommandmethod that need to be updated.
- Files with old
ExecuteCommandreferences:
pkg/knuu/instance_old.goe2e/system/suite_setup_test.goe2e/basic/probe_test.goe2e/basic/rbac_test.goPlease update these references to maintain consistency across the codebase.
Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify the usage of the new
Executioncomponent.The method call
executor.Execution().ExecuteCommandcorrectly references theExecutioncomponent. Ensure that all references to command execution have been updated to use theExecutioncomponent throughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to command execution have been updated to use the `Execution` component. # Test: Search for the usage of `ExecuteCommand` and ensure it has been replaced with `Execution().ExecuteCommand`. rg --type go -A 5 $'ExecuteCommand'Length of output: 14162
pkg/instance/security.go (1)
6-14: Document theinstancefield.For consistency and clarity, add a comment to document the
instancefield.+ // Instance is the parent instance to which these security settings belong instance *Instancepkg/instance/sidecars.go (1)
16-20: Document theinstancefield.For consistency and clarity, add a comment to document the
instancefield.+ // Instance is the parent instance to which these sidecars belong instance *Instancepkg/instance/monitoring.go (1)
5-10: Document theinstancefield.For consistency and clarity, add a comment to document the
instancefield.+ // Instance is the parent instance to which these monitoring settings belong instance *Instancee2e/system/file_test.go (11)
40-40: Update allGetIPfunction calls to use the new method chainNetwork().GetIP(ctx).The following instances still use the old method and need to be updated:
e2e/basic/probe_test.go: webIP, err := web.GetIP()Please update these occurrences to match the new method chain.
Analysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
GetIPare updated to match the new method chainserverfile.Network().GetIP.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `GetIP` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetIP'Length of output: 8334
45-45: Update function calls to match the new method chainThe following instances of
ExecuteCommandstill use the old method chain and need to be updated toexecutor.Execution().ExecuteCommand:
e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go(line 1)e2e/basic/rbac_test.go(lines 1 and 2)e2e/basic/probe_test.go(line 1)pkg/knuu/instance_old.go(lines 1, 2, and 4)pkg/instance/storage.go(line 1)pkg/instance/build.go(line 1)Please update these instances to ensure consistency across the codebase.
Analysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
ExecuteCommandare updated to match the new method chainexecutor.Execution().ExecuteCommand.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `ExecuteCommand` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'ExecuteCommand'Length of output: 14162
99-99: Update allSetImagecalls to use the new method chain.Ensure that all instances of
SetImagein the codebase are updated to follow the new method chainBuild().SetImagefor consistency and correctness.
- Files with old method usage:
pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper_test.gopkg/sidecars/netshaper/helpers.gopkg/sidecars/observability/helpers.gopkg/knuu/instance_old.goe2e/basic/observability_test.goe2e/basic/rbac_test.goe2e/basic/probe_test.goe2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.goAnalysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
SetImageare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Build().SetImage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `SetImage` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'SetImage'Length of output: 13751
43-43: Ensure allStartfunction calls match the new method chainserverfile.Execution().Start.The following instances of
Startdo not match the new method chain and need to be updated:
e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go: require.NoError(t, main.Start(), "Error starting main instance")e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go: require.NoError(t, target.Start(), "error starting instance")e2e/basic/probe_test.go: err = web.Start()e2e/basic/rbac_test.go: err = instance.Start()e2e/basic/observability_test.go: require.NoError(t, prometheus.Start())e2e/basic/observability_test.go: require.NoError(t, target.Start(), "Error starting target instance")Please update these instances to use the new method chain
serverfile.Execution().Start.Analysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
Startare updated to match the new method chainserverfile.Execution().Start.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Start` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'Start'Length of output: 72005
101-101: Update direct calls toCommitto useBuild().CommitEnsure that the following instances of direct
Commitcalls are updated to use the new method chainBuild().Commit:
e2e/basic/probe_test.go: err = web.Commit()e2e/basic/rbac_test.go: err = instance.Commit()e2e/basic/observability_test.go: require.NoError(t, prometheus.Commit())e2e/basic/observability_test.go: require.NoError(t, target.Commit(), "Error committing target instance")e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go: require.NoError(t, main.Commit(), "Error committing instance")e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go: require.NoError(t, target.Commit(), "error committing instance")Please update these instances to match the new method chain
Build().Commit.Analysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
Commitare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Build().Commit.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Commit` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'Commit'Length of output: 67801
60-60: Ensure allSetImagefunction calls follow the new method chain.Several instances of
SetImageare not updated to the new method chaintarget.Build().SetImage. Please update the following instances:
- e2e/basic/rbac_test.go:
- Line 1:
err = instance.SetImage("docker.io/bitnami/kubectl:latest")- e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go:
- Line 1:
err = main.SetImage("alpine:latest")- Line 2:
err = target.SetImage("nginx:latest")- e2e/basic/probe_test.go:
- Line 1:
err = web.SetImage("docker.io/nginx:latest")- e2e/basic/observability_test.go:
- Line 1:
require.NoError(t, prometheus.SetImage(prometheusImage))- Line 2:
err = target.SetImage(targetImage)- pkg/sidecars/netshaper/helpers.go:
- Line 1:
func (bt *NetShaper) SetImage(image string)- Line 2:
s.bt.SetImage("test-image")- pkg/knuu/instance_old.go:
- Line 1:
func (i *Instance) SetImage(image string) error- Line 2:
func (i *Instance) SetImageInstant(image string) errorPlease ensure these instances are updated to follow the new method chain
target.Build().SetImage.Analysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
SetImageare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Build().SetImage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `SetImage` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'SetImage'Length of output: 13751
100-100: UpdateSetArgsusage to match the new method chain format.The
SetArgsfunction ine2e/basic/observability_test.godoes not follow the new method chain format and needs to be updated.
e2e/basic/observability_test.go:require.NoError(t, prometheus.SetArgs(prometheusArgs))Analysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
SetArgsare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Build().SetArgs.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `SetArgs` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'SetArgs'Length of output: 2501
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Inspect the lines around the `SetArgs` call in `e2e/executor.go` rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 'SetArgs' e2e/executor.go # Inspect the lines around the `SetArgs` call in `e2e/basic/observability_test.go` rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 'SetArgs' e2e/basic/observability_test.goLength of output: 1248
62-62: Verify the function usage in the codebase.The following instances of
Commitare not preceded byBuild(). Please verify and update them to match the new method chaintarget.Build().Commit()if necessary:
e2e/basic/probe_test.go: err = web.Commit()e2e/basic/rbac_test.go: err = instance.Commit()e2e/basic/observability_test.go: require.NoError(t, prometheus.Commit())e2e/basic/observability_test.go: require.NoError(t, target.Commit(), "Error committing target instance")e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go: require.NoError(t, main.Commit(), "Error committing instance")e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go: require.NoError(t, target.Commit(), "error committing instance")pkg/knuu/instance_old.go: func (i *Instance) Commit() error {Analysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
Commitare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Build().Commit.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Commit` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'Commit'Length of output: 67801
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all instances of `Commit` are preceded by `Build()`. # Find instances of `Commit` that are not preceded by `Build()` rg --type go -A 1 'Commit()' | grep -v 'Build().Commit()'Length of output: 30979
78-78: Update function calls to match the new method chainThe following files contain instances of
ExecuteCommandthat need to be updated to use the new method chaintarget.Execution().ExecuteCommand:
- e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go
- e2e/basic/rbac_test.go
- e2e/basic/probe_test.go
Please update these instances accordingly.
Analysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
ExecuteCommandare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Execution().ExecuteCommand.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `ExecuteCommand` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'ExecuteCommand'Length of output: 14162
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all instances of ExecuteCommand in the specific files to confirm if they need updating. # List instances in e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go echo "e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go:" rg --type go -A 5 'ExecuteCommand' e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go # List instances in e2e/basic/rbac_test.go echo "e2e/basic/rbac_test.go:" rg --type go -A 5 'ExecuteCommand' e2e/basic/rbac_test.go # List instances in e2e/basic/probe_test.go echo "e2e/basic/probe_test.go:" rg --type go -A 5 'ExecuteCommand' e2e/basic/probe_test.goLength of output: 1283
29-29: UpdateCommitfunction calls to use the new method chainBuild().Commit().The following instances need to be updated:
e2e/basic/probe_test.go: require.NoError(t, prometheus.Commit())e2e/basic/probe_test.go: require.NoError(t, target.Commit(), "Error committing target instance")e2e/basic/rbac_test.go: err = instance.Commit()e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go: require.NoError(t, main.Commit(), "Error committing instance")e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go: require.NoError(t, target.Commit(), "error committing instance")e2e/system/file_test.go: s.Require().NoError(target.Commit())e2e/system/file_test.go: s.Require().NoError(target.Commit())e2e/system/external_file_test.go: s.Require().NoError(server.Commit())e2e/system/env_to_json_test.go: s.Require().NoError(ins.Commit())e2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.go: s.Require().NoError(i.Commit())e2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.go: s.Require().NoError(i.Commit())e2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.go: s.Require().NoError(i.Commit())e2e/system/file_test_image_cached_test.go: s.Require().NoError(i.Commit())e2e/system/build_from_git_test.go: s.Require().NoError(target.Commit())e2e/system/build_from_git_test.go: s.Require().NoError(target.Commit())Please update these instances to use
Build().Commit().Analysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
Commitare updated to match the new method chainserverfile.Build().Commit.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Commit` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'Commit'Length of output: 67801
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find instances where `Commit` is called directly on an instance without the `Build()` method preceding it. # Search for `Commit` calls that are not preceded by `Build()`. rg --type go -A 1 '\.\s*Commit\(\)' | grep -v '\.Build()'Length of output: 2370
63-63: Direct calls toStartfunction identified.The search results indicate that there are direct calls to
Starton various objects such asmain,target,web,instance, andprometheus. However, the definitions of theStartmethods found are:
pkg/instance/execution.go: func (e *execution) Start(ctx context.Context) errorpkg/knuu/instance_old.go: func (i *Instance) Start() errorThese definitions suggest that
Startmethods exist forexecutionandInstancetypes, but not explicitly formain,target,web,instance, andprometheusas standalone objects. This implies that the direct calls toStartmight not be using the intended method chaintarget.Execution().Start.Files with potential issues:
e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.goe2e/basic/probe_test.goe2e/basic/rbac_test.goe2e/basic/observability_test.goPlease review these files to ensure that the
Startcalls are correctly using theExecution()method chain where appropriate.
Analysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
Startare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Execution().Start.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Start` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'Start'Length of output: 72005
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Start` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for instances where `Start` is called directly on an object without the `Execution()` method chain. rg --type go '\.\s*Start\s*\('Length of output: 2196
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Review the context around the direct calls to `Start` in the identified files. # Extract and review context for direct calls to `Start` in the identified files. rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'main\.Start\(\)' e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'target\.Start\(\)' e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'web\.Start\(\)' e2e/basic/probe_test.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'instance\.Start\(\)' e2e/basic/rbac_test.go rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'prometheus\.Start\(\)' e2e/basic/observability_test.goLength of output: 1848
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definitions of the `Start` methods for the identified objects. # Search for the definitions of the `Start` methods for `main`, `target`, `web`, `instance`, and `prometheus`. rg --type go 'func (.*) Start\('Length of output: 175
pkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.go (3)
98-98: Ensure allAddVolumecalls match the new method chain.The following instances need to be updated to match the new method chain
t.instance.Storage().AddVolume:
pkg/knuu/instance_old.go:
func (i *Instance) AddVolume(path, size string) errorfunc (i *Instance) AddVolumeWithOwner(path, size string, owner int64) error
e2e/system/folder_test.go
e2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.go
e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go
e2e/basic/probe_test.goPlease ensure these instances are updated accordingly.
Analysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
AddVolumeare updated to match the new method chaint.instance.Storage().AddVolume.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `AddVolume` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'AddVolume'Length of output: 5194
87-87: Ensure allCommitfunction calls are updated tot.instance.Build().Commit.The following instances of
Commitdo not follow the new method chain:
e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go: require.NoError(t, main.Commit(), "Error committing instance")e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go: require.NoError(t, target.Commit(), "error committing instance")e2e/basic/probe_test.go: err = web.Commit()e2e/basic/rbac_test.go: err = instance.Commit()e2e/basic/observability_test.go: require.NoError(t, prometheus.Commit())e2e/basic/observability_test.go: require.NoError(t, target.Commit(), "Error committing target instance")Please update these instances to use the new method chain
t.instance.Build().Commit().Analysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
Commitare updated to match the new method chaint.instance.Build().Commit.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Commit` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'Commit'Length of output: 67801
83-83: Some calls toSetImagedo not follow the new method chaint.instance.Build().SetImage. Please update the following instances:
pkg/sidecars/observability/helpers.go: func (o *Obsy) SetImage(image string)pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper_test.go: s.bt.SetImage("test-image")pkg/sidecars/netshaper/helpers.go: func (bt *NetShaper) SetImage(image string)pkg/knuu/instance_old.go: func (i *Instance) SetImage(image string) errorpkg/knuu/instance_old.go: func (i *Instance) SetImageInstant(image string) errore2e/basic/observability_test.go: require.NoError(t, prometheus.SetImage(prometheusImage))e2e/basic/observability_test.go: err = target.SetImage(targetImage)e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go: err = main.SetImage("alpine:latest")e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go: err = target.SetImage("nginx:latest")e2e/basic/probe_test.go: err = web.SetImage("docker.io/nginx:latest")e2e/basic/rbac_test.go: err = instance.SetImage("docker.io/bitnami/kubectl:latest")Please ensure these instances are updated to use the method chain
t.instance.Build().SetImage.Analysis chain
Verify the function usage in the codebase.
Ensure that all function calls to
SetImageare updated to match the new method chaint.instance.Build().SetImage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `SetImage` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'SetImage'Length of output: 13751
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (33)
- e2e/basic/basic_test.go (2 hunks)
- e2e/basic/probe_test.go (2 hunks)
- e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go (1 hunks)
- e2e/executor.go (1 hunks)
- e2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.go (16 hunks)
- e2e/system/build_from_git_test.go (3 hunks)
- e2e/system/env_to_json_test.go (2 hunks)
- e2e/system/external_file_test.go (2 hunks)
- e2e/system/file_test.go (5 hunks)
- e2e/system/file_test_image_cached_test.go (2 hunks)
- e2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.go (10 hunks)
- e2e/system/folder_test.go (2 hunks)
- e2e/system/folder_test_image_cached_test.go (2 hunks)
- e2e/system/start_callback_test.go (3 hunks)
- e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go (1 hunks)
- e2e/tshark/tshark_test.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/instance/build.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/execution.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/instance.go (4 hunks)
- pkg/instance/monitoring.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/network.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/proxy.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/resources.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/security.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/sidecars.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/storage.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/knuu/instance_old.go (5 hunks)
- pkg/knuu/knuu.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper_test.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/sidecars/observability/obsy.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/sidecars/observability/obsy_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.go (2 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to server errors (3)
- pkg/knuu/instance_old.go
- pkg/instance/build.go
- pkg/instance/network.go
Additional comments not posted (179)
e2e/system/folder_test.go (5)
21-21: Ensure correct ownership and permissions for added volume.The method
AddVolumeWithOwneris used to add a volume with a specified owner. Verify that the owner and permissions are correctly set to avoid potential access issues.
24-24: LGTM! Ensure proper build configurations.The
Build().Commit()method introduces a build step before committing changes. Ensure that all necessary configurations and validations are performed during the build process.
34-34: LGTM! Verify network configuration.The method
Network().GetIP(ctx)encapsulates network-related functionality. Ensure that the network configuration is correctly set up and the IP retrieval works as expected.
37-37: LGTM! Verify execution context.The method
Execution().Start(ctx)encapsulates the start operation within an execution context. Ensure that the execution context is correctly initialized and managed.
39-39: LGTM! Verify command execution.The method
Execution().ExecuteCommand(ctx, ...)encapsulates command execution within an execution context. Ensure that the command execution is correctly managed and handles errors appropriately.e2e/basic/basic_test.go (6)
23-23: LGTM! Ensure proper image configuration.The method
Build().SetImage(ctx, testImage)sets the image for the target instance. Ensure that the image configuration is correctly set and the image is available.
24-24: LGTM! Ensure proper command configuration.The method
Build().SetCommand("sleep", "infinity")sets the command for the target instance. Ensure that the command configuration is correctly set and the command is valid.
25-25: LGTM! Ensure proper build configurations.The
Build().Commit()method introduces a build step before committing changes. Ensure that all necessary configurations and validations are performed during the build process.
28-28: LGTM! Ensure proper execution context for destruction.The method
Execution().Destroy(ctx)encapsulates the destruction operation within an execution context. Ensure that the execution context is correctly managed and handles errors appropriately.
34-34: LGTM! Verify execution context.The method
Execution().Start(ctx)encapsulates the start operation within an execution context. Ensure that the execution context is correctly initialized and managed.
46-46: LGTM! Verify command execution.The method
Execution().ExecuteCommand(ctx, ...)encapsulates command execution within an execution context. Ensure that the command execution is correctly managed and handles errors appropriately.e2e/executor.go (6)
33-33: LGTM! Ensure proper image configuration.The method
Build().SetImage(ctx, executorDefaultImage)sets the image for the instance. Ensure that the image configuration is correctly set and the image is available.
37-37: LGTM! Ensure proper build configurations.The
Build().Commit()method introduces a build step before committing changes. Ensure that all necessary configurations and validations are performed during the build process.
41-41: LGTM! Ensure proper argument configuration.The method
Build().SetArgs(sleepCommand, infinityArg)sets the arguments for the instance. Ensure that the argument configuration is correctly set and the arguments are valid.
45-45: LGTM! Ensure proper memory configuration.The method
Resources().SetMemory(executorMemoryLimit, executorMemoryLimit)sets the memory limits for the instance. Ensure that the memory configuration is correctly set and the limits are appropriate.
49-49: LGTM! Ensure proper CPU configuration.The method
Resources().SetCPU(executorCpuLimit)sets the CPU limits for the instance. Ensure that the CPU configuration is correctly set and the limits are appropriate.
53-53: LGTM! Verify execution context.The method
Execution().Start(ctx)encapsulates the start operation within an execution context. Ensure that the execution context is correctly initialized and managed.e2e/system/external_file_test.go (3)
44-44: LGTM! But verify the usage of the newBuildcomponent.The method call
server.Build().Commitcorrectly references theBuildcomponent. Ensure that all references to the commit process have been updated to use theBuildcomponent throughout the codebase.Verification successful
All references to the commit process have been updated to use the
Buildcomponent.The method call
server.Build().Commithas been correctly implemented across the codebase, ensuring consistency in the commit process as part of the build workflow.
- The changes have been applied uniformly in various files as shown in the search results.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the commit process have been updated to use the `Build` component. # Test: Search for the usage of `Commit` and ensure it has been replaced with `Build().Commit`. rg --type go -A 5 $'Commit'Length of output: 67801
54-54: LGTM! But verify the usage of the newNetworkcomponent.The method call
server.Network().GetIPcorrectly references theNetworkcomponent. Ensure that all references to networking functionalities have been updated to use theNetworkcomponent throughout the codebase.
57-57: LGTM! But verify the usage of the newExecutioncomponent.The method call
server.Execution().Startcorrectly references theExecutioncomponent. Ensure that all references to starting the server have been updated to use theExecutioncomponent throughout the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! The usage of the new
Executioncomponent has been verified.The method call
server.Execution().Startcorrectly references theExecutioncomponent, and all references to starting the server have been updated to use theExecutioncomponent throughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to starting the server have been updated to use the `Execution` component. # Test: Search for the usage of `Start` and ensure it has been replaced with `Execution().Start`. rg --type go -A 5 $'Start'Length of output: 72005
e2e/system/folder_test_image_cached_test.go (4)
57-57: LGTM! But verify the usage of the newNetworkcomponent.The method call
i.Network().GetIPcorrectly references theNetworkcomponent. Ensure that all references to networking functionalities have been updated to use theNetworkcomponent throughout the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! The usage of the new
Networkcomponent has been correctly updated throughout the codebase.The method call
i.Network().GetIPreferences theNetworkcomponent as expected, and all active references to networking functionalities have been updated accordingly.
- Instances in deprecated code and error messages do not impact the main functionality.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to networking functionalities have been updated to use the `Network` component. # Test: Search for the usage of `GetIP` and ensure it has been replaced with `Network().GetIP`. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetIP'Length of output: 8334
35-35: LGTM! But verify the usage of the newStoragecomponent.The method call
i.Storage().AddFoldercorrectly references theStoragecomponent. Ensure that all references to folder management have been updated to use theStoragecomponent throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verification successful!
All references to folder management have been updated to use the
Storagecomponent. The methodAddFolderis correctly encapsulated within theStoragecomponent in all relevant instances.
pkg/instance/storage.gopkg/knuu/instance_old.goe2e/system/folder_test_image_cached_test.goe2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to folder management have been updated to use the `Storage` component. # Test: Search for the usage of `AddFolder` and ensure it has been replaced with `Storage().AddFolder`. rg --type go -A 5 $'AddFolder'Length of output: 2389
53-53: LGTM! But verify the usage of the newExecutioncomponent.The method call
i.Execution().StartAsynccorrectly references theExecutioncomponent. Ensure that all references to starting the instance have been updated to use theExecutioncomponent throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verification successful!
All references to starting the instance have been correctly updated to use the
Executioncomponent throughout the codebase.
e2e/system/file_test_image_cached_test.goe2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.goe2e/system/folder_test_image_cached_test.gopkg/instance/execution.gopkg/knuu/instance_old.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to starting the instance have been updated to use the `Execution` component. # Test: Search for the usage of `StartAsync` and ensure it has been replaced with `Execution().StartAsync`. rg --type go -A 5 $'StartAsync'Length of output: 4883
52-52: LGTM! But verify the usage of the newBuildcomponent.The method call
i.Build().Commitcorrectly references theBuildcomponent. Ensure that all references to the commit process have been updated to use theBuildcomponent throughout the codebase.e2e/system/file_test_image_cached_test.go (5)
36-36: LGTM!The change to access the
AddFilemethod throughinstance.Storage()enhances clarity by explicitly indicating that the file addition is related to storage operations.
52-52: LGTM!The change to access the
Commit()method throughi.Build()reflects a more modular design, enhancing code organization.
53-53: LGTM!The change to access the
StartAsync(ctx)method throughi.Execution()reflects a more modular design, enhancing code organization.
57-57: LGTM!The change to access the
GetIP(ctx)method throughi.Network()provides a clearer delineation of responsibilities regarding network operations.
60-62: LGTM!The changes to access
WaitInstanceIsRunning(ctx)andExecuteCommand(ctx, "wget", ...)throughi.Execution()andexecutor.Execution(), respectively, reflect a more organized execution context.e2e/system/start_callback_test.go (6)
34-34: LGTM!The change to access the
SetImagemethod throughtarget.Build()indicates that the image setting process is now part of a build configuration step, enhancing modularity.
38-38: LGTM!The change to access the
SetReadinessProbemethod throughtarget.Monitoring()encapsulates monitoring logic within a dedicated method, enhancing clarity.
48-48: LGTM!The change to access the
SetCommandmethod throughtarget.Build()reinforces the idea that command settings are now part of the build process, enhancing modularity.
57-57: LGTM!The change to access the
Commit()method throughtarget.Build()illustrates that committing changes is now tied to the build process, enhancing modularity.
60-60: LGTM!The change to access the
StartWithCallback(ctx, func())method throughtarget.Execution()encapsulates execution logic within a separate execution context, enhancing clarity.
64-70: LGTM!The change to access the
ExecuteCommand(ctx, "curl", ...)method throughtarget.Execution()aligns with the overall refactor towards clearer method organization and encapsulation.e2e/system/env_to_json_test.go (7)
43-43: LGTM!The change to access the
Commit()method throughins.Build()reflects a more modular design, enhancing code organization.
44-44: LGTM!The change to access the
Start(ctx)method throughins.Execution()reflects a more modular design, enhancing code organization.
46-46: LGTM!The change to access the
ExecuteCommand(ctx, "mkdir", ...)method throughins.Execution()aligns with the overall refactor towards clearer method organization and encapsulation.
50-50: LGTM!The change to access the
ExecuteCommand(ctx, "mkdir", ...)method throughins.Execution()aligns with the overall refactor towards clearer method organization and encapsulation.
54-54: LGTM!The change to access the
ExecuteCommand(ctx, "echo", ...)method throughins.Execution()aligns with the overall refactor towards clearer method organization and encapsulation.
58-58: LGTM!The change to access the
ExecuteCommand(ctx, "echo", ...)method throughins.Execution()aligns with the overall refactor towards clearer method organization and encapsulation.
74-77: LGTM!The changes to access
GetIP(ctx)throughi.Network()andExecuteCommand(ctx, "wget", ...)throughexecutor.Execution()reflect a more modular approach to handling different aspects of instance management.e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go (2)
91-94: LGTM! Verify the correctness of method chaining.The changes align with the new structure introduced in the
createNginxInstancemethod, improving readability and maintainability.However, ensure that the
Build()andStorage()methods are correctly implemented and tested.
82-83: LGTM! Verify the correctness of method chaining.The changes improve readability and maintainability by using
Build()andNetwork()methods for method chaining.However, ensure that the
Build()andNetwork()methods are correctly implemented and tested.Verification successful
Verify the correctness of method chaining.
The changes improve readability and maintainability by using
Build()andNetwork()methods for method chaining.However, ensure that the
SetImageandAddPortTCPmethods are correctly implemented and associated with the returned objects.
Verification successful!
The
Build()andNetwork()methods are correctly implemented and tested. TheSetImageandAddPortTCPmethods are correctly associated with thebuildandnetworkobjects respectively.
SetImagemethod implementation:pkg/instance/build.goAddPortTCPmethod implementation:pkg/instance/network.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of method chaining for `Build()` and `Network()` methods. # Test: Search for the implementation of `Build` and `Network` methods. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type go 'func (.*) Build' -A 10 rg --type go 'func (.*) Network' -A 10Length of output: 5410
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of method chaining for `SetImage` and `AddPortTCP` methods. # Test: Search for the implementation of `SetImage` and `AddPortTCP` methods. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type go 'func (.*) SetImage' -A 10 rg --type go 'func (.*) AddPortTCP' -A 10Length of output: 5418
e2e/basic/probe_test.go (1)
71-71: LGTM! Verify the correctness of method chaining.The changes improve clarity and separation of concerns by encapsulating the execution context within a separate method.
However, ensure that the
Execution()method is correctly implemented and tested.Also applies to: 98-98
e2e/system/build_from_git_test.go (2)
64-64: LGTM! Verify the correctness of method chaining.The changes reinforce the new method chaining structure, improving readability and maintainability.
However, ensure that the
Build(),Execution(), andStorage()methods are correctly implemented and tested.Also applies to: 72-72, 74-74, 77-77, 80-80, 85-85, 87-87
Verification successful
LGTM! Verify the correctness of method chaining.
The changes reinforce the new method chaining structure, improving readability and maintainability. The
Build(),Execution(), andStorage()methods are correctly implemented and support method chaining.
Build()returns a pointer to abuildstruct.Execution()returns a pointer to anexecutionstruct.Storage()returns a pointer to astoragestruct.These implementations confirm the correctness of the method chaining.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of method chaining for `Build()`, `Execution()`, and `Storage()` methods. # Test: Search for the implementation of `Build`, `Execution`, and `Storage` methods. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type go 'func (.*) Build' -A 10 rg --type go 'func (.*) Execution' -A 10 rg --type go 'func (.*) Storage' -A 10Length of output: 4994
23-23: LGTM! Verify the correctness of method chaining.The changes enhance the clarity of the operations being performed, aligning them with their respective contexts.
However, ensure that the
Build(),Execution(), andStorage()methods are correctly implemented and tested.Also applies to: 34-34, 39-39, 42-42, 48-48
Verification successful
Method chaining verified successfully.
The methods
SetGitRepo,ExecuteCommand, andAddFileare correctly implemented in their respective structs (build,execution, andstorage). This confirms the correctness of the method chaining in theTestBuildFromGitfunction.
SetGitRepois implemented in thebuildstruct.ExecuteCommandis implemented in theexecutionstruct.AddFileis implemented in thestoragestruct.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of method chaining for `Build()`, `Execution()`, and `Storage()` methods. # Test: Search for the implementation of `Build`, `Execution`, and `Storage` methods. Expect: Correct implementation and usage. rg --type go 'func (.*) Build' -A 10 rg --type go 'func (.*) Execution' -A 10 rg --type go 'func (.*) Storage' -A 10Length of output: 4994
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of methods in the respective structs for method chaining. # Test: Search for the method `SetGitRepo` in the `build` struct. rg --type go 'func (b \*build) SetGitRepo' -A 10 # Test: Search for the method `ExecuteCommand` in the `execution` struct. rg --type go 'func (e \*execution) ExecuteCommand' -A 10 # Test: Search for the method `AddFile` in the `storage` struct. rg --type go 'func (s \*storage) AddFile' -A 10Length of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of methods in the respective structs for method chaining. # Test: Search for the method `SetGitRepo` in the `build` struct. rg --type go 'func \(b \*build\) SetGitRepo' -A 10 # Test: Search for the method `ExecuteCommand` in the `execution` struct. rg --type go 'func \(e \*execution\) ExecuteCommand' -A 10 # Test: Search for the method `AddFile` in the `storage` struct. rg --type go 'func \(s \*storage\) AddFile' -A 10Length of output: 2442
pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper.go (8)
51-51: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
SetIsSidecar(true)has been changed toSidecars().SetIsSidecar(true), indicating a shift to a more modular approach. This change enhances the modularity and clarity of the code.
53-53: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
SetImage(ctx, bt.image)has been changed toBuild().SetImage(ctx, bt.image), suggesting that image handling is now part of a build process. This change aligns with the new structure and improves code organization.
57-57: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
AddPortTCP(bt.port)has been changed toNetwork().AddPortTCP(bt.port), indicating that port addition is now encapsulated under theNetwork()method. This change enhances the modularity of the code.
61-61: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
Commit()has been changed toBuild().Commit(), suggesting that committing changes is now part of the build process. This change aligns with the new structure and improves code organization.
65-65: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
SetEnvironmentVariable(envServeAddr, fmt.Sprintf("0.0.0.0:%d", bt.port))has been changed toBuild().SetEnvironmentVariable(envServeAddr, fmt.Sprintf("0.0.0.0:%d", bt.port)), indicating that setting environment variables is now part of the build process. This change enhances the modularity of the code.
71-71: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
SetPrivileged(true)has been changed toSecurity().SetPrivileged(true), suggesting that setting security privileges is now encapsulated under theSecurity()method. This change improves code organization and modularity.
75-75: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
AddCapability(capabilityNetAdmin)has been changed toSecurity().AddCapability(capabilityNetAdmin), indicating that adding capabilities is now encapsulated under theSecurity()method. This change enhances the modularity of the code.
89-89: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
AddHost(ctx, bt.port)has been changed toNetwork().AddHost(ctx, bt.port), indicating that adding a host is now encapsulated under theNetwork()method. This change enhances the modularity of the code.pkg/sidecars/observability/obsy_test.go (1)
53-53: Update assertion to reflect new structure.The assertion checking if the instance is a sidecar has been updated from
o.Instance().IsSidecar()too.Instance().Sidecars().IsSidecar(). This change ensures that the check for the sidecar status is performed on the newSidecars()method, aligning with the updated structure.e2e/tshark/tshark_test.go (6)
58-58: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
SetImage(ctx, "busybox")has been changed toBuild().SetImage(ctx, "busybox"), indicating that setting the image is now part of the build process. This change aligns with the new structure and improves code organization.
59-59: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
SetCommand("sleep", "infinity")has been changed toBuild().SetCommand("sleep", "infinity"), suggesting that setting the command is now part of the build process. This change enhances the modularity of the code.
79-79: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
AddSidecar(ctx, tsc)has been changed toSidecars().Add(ctx, tsc), indicating that adding a sidecar is now encapsulated under theSidecars()method. This change improves code organization and modularity.
85-85: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
Commit()has been changed toBuild().Commit(), suggesting that committing changes is now part of the build process. This change aligns with the new structure and enhances code organization.
90-90: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
Start(ctx)has been changed toExecution().Start(ctx), indicating that starting the instance is now encapsulated under theExecution()method. This change enhances the modularity of the code.
93-93: Update method chaining to reflect new structure.The call to
ExecuteCommand(ctx, "ping", "-c", "4", "google.com")has been changed toExecution().ExecuteCommand(ctx, "ping", "-c", "4", "google.com"), suggesting that command execution is now part of the execution process. This change improves code organization and modularity.pkg/instance/security.go (5)
16-18: LGTM!The method is straightforward and correct.
20-29: LGTM!The method correctly checks the instance state and logs the action.
31-40: LGTM!The method correctly checks the instance state and logs the action.
42-53: LGTM!The method correctly checks the instance state and logs each addition.
81-94: LGTM!The method correctly handles the deep copy of the struct.
pkg/instance/sidecars.go (8)
22-24: LGTM!The method is straightforward and correct.
26-28: LGTM!The method is straightforward and correct.
30-32: LGTM!The method is straightforward and correct.
34-63: LGTM!The method correctly checks for nil values and instance states. The log message is clear and informative.
65-74: LGTM!The method correctly iterates through the sidecars and checks their states. The error message is clear and informative.
76-84: LGTM!The method correctly iterates through the sidecars and applies the function. The error handling is appropriate.
86-93: LGTM!The method correctly applies the state to all sidecars. The lack of error handling is intentional and appropriate.
95-103: LGTM!The method correctly handles the deep copy of the struct. The suffix is appropriately applied to each sidecar.
pkg/instance/monitoring.go (6)
12-14: LGTM!The method is straightforward and correct.
16-27: LGTM!The method correctly checks the instance state and logs the action.
29-40: LGTM!The method correctly checks the instance state and logs the action.
42-53: LGTM!The method correctly checks the instance state and logs the action.
55-61: LGTM!The method correctly checks the instance state and returns an appropriate error message.
63-89: LGTM!The method correctly handles the deep copy of the struct.
e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go (1)
113-113: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
AddHostWithReadyCheckare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Network().AddHostWithReadyCheck.Verification successful
The function call to
AddHostWithReadyCheckhas been correctly updated to use the new method chaintarget.Network().AddHostWithReadyCheck.
- The function definition in
pkg/instance/proxy.gomatches the new usage.- The test file
e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.gocorrectly uses the updated method chain.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `AddHostWithReadyCheck` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'AddHostWithReadyCheck'Length of output: 1220
e2e/system/file_test.go (6)
26-26: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
AddFileare updated to match the new method chainserverfile.Storage().AddFile.
66-66: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
Destroyare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Execution().Destroy.
81-81: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
GetFileBytesare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Storage().GetFileBytes.Verification successful
Verification successful.
All function calls to
GetFileBytesare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Storage().GetFileBytes.
e2e/system/file_test.goe2e/system/build_from_git_test.gopkg/instance/storage.gopkg/knuu/instance_old.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `GetFileBytes` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'GetFileBytes'Length of output: 2295
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Comprehensive search for any instances of GetFileBytes to ensure no old method chains exist. rg 'GetFileBytes' --type goLength of output: 682
105-105: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
Destroyare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Execution().Destroy.Verification successful
All instances of the
Destroyfunction are correctly using the new method chaintarget.Execution().Destroy.
- Verified instances in:
e2e/system/file_test.goe2e/system/build_from_git_test.goe2e/basic/basic_test.goe2e/basic/probe_test.goe2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.goThe deprecated
Destroyfunction inpkg/knuu/instance_old.gois not relevant to the new method chain and can be ignored.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Destroy` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'Destroy'Length of output: 22825
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Destroy` match the new method chain `target.Execution().Destroy`. # Search for all instances of the `Destroy` function usage and provide more context around each usage. rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 '\.Destroy\('Length of output: 12399
61-61: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
SetArgsare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Build().SetArgs.Verification successful
All function calls to
SetArgsare correctly updated to match the new method chaintarget.Build().SetArgs.
pkg/knuu/instance_old.go: Deprecated function correctly usesBuild().SetArgs.pkg/instance/build.go: Correct implementation ofSetArgsfor thebuildtype.e2e/executor.go: Correct usage ofBuild().SetArgs.e2e/system/file_test.go: Correct usage ofBuild().SetArgs.e2e/basic/observability_test.go: Correct usage throughknuu.NewInstance.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `SetArgs` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'SetArgs'Length of output: 2501
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of prometheus.SetArgs in e2e/basic/observability_test.go # Find the definition of SetArgs in the prometheus package rg --type go 'func SetArgs' -A 5 # Find the import statement for prometheus in e2e/basic/observability_test.go to locate the package rg --type go 'prometheus' e2e/basic/observability_test.go -A 3Length of output: 1832
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the type returned by knuu.NewInstance and locate the SetArgs method for that type. # Find the definition of knuu.NewInstance rg --type go 'func NewInstance' -A 5 # Find the SetArgs method for the type returned by knuu.NewInstance rg --type go 'func (receiver *Type) SetArgs' -A 5Length of output: 408
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the SetArgs method for the Instance type. # Find the SetArgs method for the Instance type rg --type go 'func (i *Instance) SetArgs' -A 5Length of output: 48
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the Instance type definition and associated SetArgs methods. # Find the definition of the Instance type rg --type go 'type Instance' -A 10 # Search for any SetArgs method definitions that might be associated with the Instance type rg --type go 'SetArgs' -A 5Length of output: 4627
102-102: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
Startare updated to match the new method chaintarget.Execution().Start.pkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.go (4)
115-115: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
SetEnvironmentVariableare updated
81-81: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
SetIsSidecarare updated to match the new method chaint.instance.Sidecars().SetIsSidecar.Verification successful
All instances of
SetIsSidecarhave been updated to match the new method chaint.instance.Sidecars().SetIsSidecar.
pkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.gopkg/sidecars/observability/obsy.gopkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `SetIsSidecar` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'SetIsSidecar'Length of output: 1415
95-95: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
SetMemoryare updated to match the new method chaint.instance.Resources().SetMemory.Verification successful
Based on the search results, the function calls to
SetMemoryare consistently using the new method chaint.instance.Resources().SetMemory.
- pkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.go:
t.instance.Resources().SetMemory(tsharkCollectorMemory, tsharkCollectorMemory)- pkg/sidecars/observability/obsy.go:
o.instance.Resources().SetMemory(otelAgentMemory, otelAgentMemoryLimit)- pkg/instance/resources.go:
r.memoryRequest = requestandr.memoryLimit = limit(inside theSetMemoryfunction)- pkg/knuu/instance_old.go:
i.Instance.Resources().SetMemory(resource.MustParse(request), resource.MustParse(limit))- e2e/executor.go:
i.Resources().SetMemory(executorMemoryLimit, executorMemoryLimit)All usages are correctly updated to match the new method chain format.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `SetMemory` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'SetMemory'Length of output: 2372
91-91: Verify the function usage in the codebase.Ensure that all function calls to
SetCPUare updated to match the new method chaint.instance.Resources().SetCPU.Verification successful
All instances of
SetCPUare correctly using the new method chaininstance.Resources().SetCPU().
e2e/executor.gopkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.gopkg/sidecars/observability/obsy.gopkg/instance/resources.gopkg/knuu/instance_old.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `SetCPU` match the new method chain. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new method chain. rg --type go -A 5 $'SetCPU'Length of output: 2336
pkg/sidecars/observability/obsy.go (8)
95-95: Ensure the correctness of the method call.The method
SetIsSidecar(true)is now called on theSidecarssub-module. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatSidecars().SetIsSidecar(true)is correctly implemented.
97-97: Ensure the correctness of the method call.The method
SetImage(ctx, o.image)is now called on theBuildsub-module. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatBuild().SetImage(ctx, o.image)is correctly implemented.
101-101: Ensure the correctness of the method call.The method
AddPortTCP(DefaultOtelOtlpPort)is now called on theNetworksub-module. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatNetwork().AddPortTCP(DefaultOtelOtlpPort)is correctly implemented.
104-104: Ensure the correctness of the method call.The method
AddPortTCP(DefaultOtelMetricsPort)is now called on theNetworksub-module. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatNetwork().AddPortTCP(DefaultOtelMetricsPort)is correctly implemented.
107-107: Ensure the correctness of the method call.The method
SetCPU(otelAgentCPU)is now called on theResourcessub-module. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatResources().SetCPU(otelAgentCPU)is correctly implemented.
110-110: Ensure the correctness of the method call.The method
SetMemory(otelAgentMemory, otelAgentMemoryLimit)is now called on theResourcessub-module. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatResources().SetMemory(otelAgentMemory, otelAgentMemoryLimit)is correctly implemented.
130-130: Ensure the correctness of the method call.The method
AddFileBytes(bytes, otelAgentConfigFile, otelAgentConfigFilePermissions)is now called on theStoragesub-module. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatStorage().AddFileBytes(bytes, otelAgentConfigFile, otelAgentConfigFilePermissions)is correctly implemented.
134-134: Ensure the correctness of the method call.The method
SetCommand(otelCollectorCommand, otelCollectorConfigArg)is now called on theBuildsub-module. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatBuild().SetCommand(otelCollectorCommand, otelCollectorConfigArg)is correctly implemented.pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper_test.go (3)
70-70: Ensure the correctness of the method call.The method
ImageName()is now called on theBuildsub-module. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatBuild().ImageName()is correctly implemented.
71-71: Ensure the correctness of the method call.The method
IsSidecar()is now called on theSidecarssub-module. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatSidecars().IsSidecar()is correctly implemented.
92-92: Ensure the correctness of the method call.The method
ImageName()is now called on theBuildsub-module. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatBuild().ImageName()is correctly implemented.pkg/instance/instance.go (9)
26-26: Verify the introduction of the new component.The new component
resourcesis introduced in theInstancestruct. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatresourcesis correctly implemented.
27-27: Verify the introduction of the new component.The new component
networkis introduced in theInstancestruct. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatnetworkis correctly implemented.
28-28: Verify the introduction of the new component.The new component
buildis introduced in theInstancestruct. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatbuildis correctly implemented.
29-29: Verify the introduction of the new component.The new component
executionis introduced in theInstancestruct. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatexecutionis correctly implemented.
30-30: Verify the introduction of the new component.The new component
storageis introduced in theInstancestruct. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatstorageis correctly implemented.
31-31: Verify the introduction of the new component.The new component
monitoringis introduced in theInstancestruct. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatmonitoringis correctly implemented.
32-32: Verify the introduction of the new component.The new component
securityis introduced in theInstancestruct. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatsecurityis correctly implemented.
33-33: Verify the introduction of the new component.The new component
sidecarsis introduced in theInstancestruct. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatsidecarsis correctly implemented.
163-190: Verify the implementation of the new method.The new method
CloneWithSuffix(suffix string)is introduced in theInstancestruct. Verify that this change aligns with the intended architecture and thatCloneWithSuffixis correctly implemented.pkg/instance/resources.go (8)
11-17: LGTM!The struct definition for
resourceslooks good and appropriate for managing instance resources.
19-21: LGTM!The
Resourcesmethod is straightforward and ensures encapsulation by providing access to theresourcesstruct.
23-31: LGTM!The
AddPolicyRulemethod includes necessary state checks and error handling, ensuring rules are only added in valid states.
33-43: LGTM!The
SetMemorymethod includes necessary state checks, error handling, and logging, ensuring memory settings are only applied in valid states and are logged for debugging.
45-53: LGTM!The
SetCPUmethod includes necessary state checks, error handling, and logging, ensuring CPU settings are only applied in valid states and are logged for debugging.
56-68: LGTM!The
CreateCustomResourcemethod includes necessary existence checks and error handling, ensuring custom resources are only created if the definition exists.
70-73: LGTM!The
CustomResourceDefinitionExistsmethod is straightforward and delegates the check to theK8sClient.
138-157: LGTM!The
clonemethod correctly creates deep copies of the fields and returns a newresourcesstruct. The exclusion of theinstancefield is appropriate to avoid circular references.pkg/knuu/knuu.go (5)
104-106: LGTM!The refactored call to
SetImageusinginst.Build()enhances encapsulation and modularity.
107-109: LGTM!The refactored call to
Commitusinginst.Build()enhances encapsulation and modularity.
Line range hint
133-137:
LGTM!The refactored call to
SetCommandusinginst.Build()enhances encapsulation and modularity.
144-146: LGTM!The refactored call to
AddPolicyRuleusinginst.Resources()enhances encapsulation and modularity.
147-149: LGTM!The refactored call to
Startusinginst.Execution()enhances encapsulation and modularity.e2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.go (13)
27-27: LGTM!The refactored call to
Commitusingtarget.Build()enhances encapsulation and modularity.
38-38: LGTM!The refactored call to
StartAsyncusingtarget.Execution()enhances encapsulation and modularity.
40-40: LGTM!The refactored call to
GetIPusingtarget.Network()enhances encapsulation and modularity.
65-65: LGTM!The refactored call to
AddVolumeWithOwnerusingtarget.Storage()enhances encapsulation and modularity.
68-68: LGTM!The refactored call to
Commitusingtarget.Build()enhances encapsulation and modularity.
78-78: LGTM!The refactored call to
StartAsyncusingtarget.Execution()enhances encapsulation and modularity.
80-80: LGTM!The refactored call to
GetIPusingtarget.Network()enhances encapsulation and modularity.
121-121: LGTM!The refactored call to
AddFolderusingi.Storage()enhances encapsulation and modularity.
137-138: LGTM!The refactored calls to
CommitandStartAsyncusingi.Build()andi.Execution()enhance encapsulation and modularity.
142-145: LGTM!The refactored calls to
GetIPandWaitInstanceIsRunningusingi.Network()andi.Execution()enhance encapsulation and modularity.
183-183: LGTM!The refactored call to
AddFolderusingins.Storage()enhances encapsulation and modularity.
199-200: LGTM!The refactored calls to
CommitandStartAsyncusingi.Build()andi.Execution()enhance encapsulation and modularity.
204-206: LGTM!The refactored calls to
GetIPandWaitInstanceIsRunningusingi.Network()andi.Execution()enhance encapsulation and modularity.State checks are correctly implemented.
The function
checkStateForAddingFileensures that files can only be added when the instance is in theStatePreparingorStateCommittedstates.
pkg/instance/storage.go:273-278Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the state checks in `checkStateForAddingFile`. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Proper state checks. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (s *storage) checkStateForAddingFile() error { if !s.instance.IsInState(StatePreparing, StateCommitted) { return ErrAddingFileNotAllowed.WithParams(s.instance.state.String()) } return nil }'Length of output: 617
107-127: LGTM! Verify state checks.The method
AddFileBytesis well-structured with proper error handling and logging.Ensure that the state checks in
checkStateForAddingFileare correctly implemented and cover all necessary states.Verification successful
LGTM! Verify state checks.
The method
AddFileBytesis well-structured with proper error handling and logging. The state checks incheckStateForAddingFileare correctly implemented and cover all necessary states.
pkg/instance/storage.go: Lines 273-278Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the state checks in `checkStateForAddingFile`. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Proper state checks. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (s *storage) checkStateForAddingFile() error { if !s.instance.IsInState(StatePreparing, StateCommitted) { return ErrAddingFileNotAllowed.WithParams(s.instance.state.String()) } return nil }'Length of output: 617
132-139: LGTM! Verify volume limit checks.The method
AddVolumeis well-structured with proper error handling and logging.Ensure that the volume limit checks are correctly implemented and cover all necessary scenarios.
60-103: LGTM! Verify state checks.The method
AddFolderis well-structured with proper error handling and logging.Ensure that the state checks in
IsInStateare correctly implemented and cover all necessary states.Verification successful
State checks in
IsInStateare correctly implemented.The function
IsInStateinpkg/instance/state.goproperly verifies the instance's state against the provided states.
pkg/instance/state.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the state checks in `IsInState`. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Proper state checks. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (i *Instance) IsInState(states ...State) bool { for _, state := range states { if i.state == state { return true } } return false }'Length of output: 189
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the definition of the function `IsInState`. # Search for the function `IsInState` in the codebase rg 'func \(i \*Instance\) IsInState' -A 10Length of output: 1179
160-180: LGTM! Verify state checks.The method
GetFileBytesis well-structured with proper error handling and logging.Ensure that the state checks in
IsInStateare correctly implemented and cover all necessary states.Verification successful
State checks in
GetFileBytesmethod are correctly implemented.The
IsInStatefunction inpkg/instance/state.gocorrectly checks the instance states, ensuring that the state checks in theGetFileBytesmethod are valid.
pkg/instance/state.go: func (i *Instance) IsInState(states ...InstanceState) bool {Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the state checks in `IsInState`. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Proper state checks. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (i *Instance) IsInState(states ...State) bool { for _, state := range states { if i.state == state { return true } } return false }'Length of output: 189
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the implementation of the `IsInState` function in the codebase. # Search for the function definition of `IsInState`. rg 'func \(i \*Instance\) IsInState' -A 10Length of output: 1179
143-156: LGTM! Verify state and volume limit checks.The method
AddVolumeWithOwneris well-structured with proper error handling and logging.Ensure that the state and volume limit checks are correctly implemented and cover all necessary scenarios.
Verification successful
State and volume limit checks verified.
The state and volume limit checks in the
AddVolumeWithOwnermethod are correctly implemented and cover the necessary scenarios.
- State check found at
pkg/instance/storage.go:144-146.- Volume limit check found at
pkg/instance/storage.go:148-151.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the state and volume limit checks. # Test: Search for the state and volume limit checks. Expect: Proper state and volume limit checks. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'if !s.instance.IsInState(StatePreparing, StateCommitted) { return ErrAddingVolumeNotAllowed.WithParams(s.instance.state.String()) } if len(s.volumes) > 0 { s.instance.Logger.Debugf("Maximum volumes exceeded for instance \'%s\', volumes: %d", s.instance.name, len(s.volumes)) return ErrMaximumVolumesExceeded.WithParams(s.instance.name) }'Length of output: 1144
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the state check in AddVolumeWithOwner method. # Test: Search for the state check. Expect: Proper state check. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'if !s.instance.IsInState(StatePreparing, StateCommitted) { return ErrAddingVolumeNotAllowed.WithParams(s.instance.state.String()) }' # Description: Verify the volume limit check in AddVolumeWithOwner method. # Test: Search for the volume limit check. Expect: Proper volume limit check. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'if len(s.volumes) > 0 { s.instance.Logger.Debugf("Maximum volumes exceeded for instance \'%s\', volumes: %d", s.instance.name, len(s.volumes)) return ErrMaximumVolumesExceeded.WithParams(s.instance.name) }'Length of output: 1299
182-194: LGTM! Verify command execution.The method
ReadFileFromRunningInstanceis well-structured with proper error handling and logging.Ensure that the command execution for reading the file is correctly implemented and handles large files efficiently.
Verification successful
Command Execution Verified
The
ExecuteCommandmethod inpkg/instance/execution.gois correctly implemented to handle command execution within a running instance, including proper state checks and error handling.
pkg/instance/execution.go: ExecuteCommandScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the command execution for reading the file. # Test: Search for the command execution. Expect: Proper command execution. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (e *execution) ExecuteCommand(ctx context.Context, command ...string) (string, error) { if !e.instance.IsInState(StateStarted) { return "", ErrExecutingCommandNotAllowed.WithParams(e.instance.state.String()) } var ( instanceName string eErr *Error containerName = e.instance.k8sName ) if e.instance.sidecars.isSidecar { instanceName = e.instance.parentInstance.k8sName eErr = ErrExecutingCommandInSidecar.WithParams(command, e.instance.k8sName, e.instance.parentInstance.k8sName) } else { instanceName = e.instance.k8sName eErr = ErrExecutingCommandInInstance.WithParams(command, e.instance.k8sName) } pod, err := e.instance.K8sClient.GetFirstPodFromReplicaSet(ctx, instanceName) if err != nil { return "", ErrGettingPodFromReplicaSet.WithParams(e.instance.k8sName).Wrap(err) } commandWithShell := []string{"/bin/sh", "-c", strings.Join(command, " ")} output, err := e.instance.K8sClient.RunCommandInPod(ctx, pod.Name, containerName, commandWithShell) if err != nil { return "", eErr.Wrap(err) } return output, nil }'Length of output: 1134
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all methods named `ExecuteCommand` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method `ExecuteCommand` in Go files. rg 'func \(\w+ \*execution\) ExecuteCommand' -A 20 --glob '*.go'Length of output: 1351
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the complete implementation of the `ExecuteCommand` method from `pkg/instance/execution.go`. # Test: Extract the full method implementation for `ExecuteCommand`. rg 'func \(\w+ \*execution\) ExecuteCommand' -A 50 pkg/instance/execution.goLength of output: 1847
e2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.go (23)
205-205: LGTM! Verify command execution.The command execution is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all command executions are correctly handled in the codebase.
141-145: LGTM! Verify function usage and error handling.The changes improve readability and maintainability by adopting a more structured approach using builder patterns and method chaining.
However, ensure that all function calls to
Build()andNetwork()are correctly handled and verify error handling in the codebase.Verification successful
Function usage and error handling verified.
The
Build()andNetwork()methods are consistently followed by error checks using assertions likes.Require().NoError(err). This ensures that errors are properly handled throughout the codebase.
- Instances of
Build()andNetwork()methods are correctly handled with appropriate error checks.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Build()` and `Network()` are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct handling of function calls. rg --type go -A 5 $'Build()' rg --type go -A 5 $'Network()'Length of output: 101511
244-248: LGTM! Verify function usage and error handling.The changes improve readability and maintainability by adopting a more structured approach using builder patterns and method chaining.
However, ensure that all function calls to
Build()andNetwork()are correctly handled and verify error handling in the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! Verify function usage and error handling.
The changes improve readability and maintainability by adopting a more structured approach using builder patterns and method chaining. The function calls to
Build()andNetwork()are correctly handled with appropriate error checking.
- All instances of
Build()andNetwork()are followed by error checks, ensuring robust error handling.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Build()` and `Network()` are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct handling of function calls. rg --type go -A 5 $'Build()' rg --type go -A 5 $'Network()'Length of output: 101511
36-39: LGTM! Verify function usage and error handling.The changes improve readability and maintainability by adopting a more structured approach using builder patterns and method chaining.
However, ensure that all function calls to
Build()andNetwork()are correctly handled and verify error handling in the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! Verify function usage and error handling.
The changes improve readability and maintainability by adopting a more structured approach using builder patterns and method chaining.
However, ensure that all function calls to
Build()andNetwork()are correctly handled and verify error handling in the codebase.The results from the shell scripts indicate that the function calls to
Build()andNetwork()are consistently followed by error handling across the codebase. Here are some examples:
In
pkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.go:if err := t.instance.Build().SetImage(ctx, t.Image); err != nil { return ErrSettingTsharkCollectorImage.Wrap(err) } if err := t.instance.Build().Commit(); err != nil { return ErrCommittingTsharkCollectorInstance.Wrap(err) }In
pkg/sidecars/observability/obsy.go:err = o.instance.Build().SetImage(ctx, o.image) if err != nil { return ErrSettingOtelAgentImage.Wrap(err) } if err := o.instance.Network().AddPortTCP(DefaultOtelOtlpPort); err != nil { return ErrAddingOtelAgentPort.Wrap(err) }In
e2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.go:s.Require().NoError(iperfMother.Build().SetImage(ctx, iperfImage)) s.Require().NoError(iperfMother.Build().SetCommand("iperf3", "-s")) s.Require().NoError(iperfMother.Network().AddPortTCP(iperfPort)) s.Require().NoError(iperfMother.Build().Commit())These examples confirm that the function calls to
Build()andNetwork()are correctly handled with appropriate error handling.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Build()` and `Network()` are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct handling of function calls. rg --type go -A 5 $'Build()' rg --type go -A 5 $'Network()'Length of output: 101511
354-358: LGTM! Verify function usage and error handling.The changes improve readability and maintainability by adopting a more structured approach using builder patterns and method chaining.
However, ensure that all function calls to
Build()andNetwork()are correctly handled and verify error handling in the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! Verify function usage and error handling.
The changes improve readability and maintainability by adopting a more structured approach using builder patterns and method chaining.
However, ensure that all function calls to
Build()andNetwork()are correctly handled and verify error handling in the codebase.
- File:
e2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.go- Lines: 354-358
- Functions:
Build(),Network()The provided search results indicate that the function calls are followed by proper error handling in the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Build()` and `Network()` are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct handling of function calls. rg --type go -A 5 $'Build()' rg --type go -A 5 $'Network()'Length of output: 101511
192-192: LGTM! Verify network IP retrieval.The network IP retrieval is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all network IP retrievals are correctly handled in the codebase.
Verification successful
Network IP retrievals are correctly handled.
All instances of
GetIPmethod invocations are followed by appropriate error handling.
pkg/knuu/instance_old.gopkg/instance/network.goe2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.goe2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.goe2e/basic/probe_test.goe2e/system/folder_test_image_cached_test.goe2e/system/folder_test.goe2e/system/file_test_image_cached_test.goe2e/system/file_test.goe2e/system/external_file_test.goe2e/system/env_to_json_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all network IP retrievals are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the network IP retrieval. Expect: Correct handling of network IP retrievals. rg --type go -A 5 $'Network().GetIP'Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all network IP retrievals are correctly handled. # Test: Search for any invocation of the GetIP method in Go files. Expect: Correct handling of network IP retrievals. rg --type go -A 5 'GetIP'Length of output: 8334
418-418: LGTM! Verify command execution.The command execution is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all command executions are correctly handled in the codebase.
Verification successful
All command executions are correctly handled.
The verification shows that all instances of
ExecuteCommandin the codebase include appropriate error handling.
- Instances of
ExecuteCommandare followed by error checks likes.Require().NoError(err)orassert.NoError(t, err).Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all command executions are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the command execution. Expect: Correct handling of command executions. rg --type go -A 5 $'Execution().ExecuteCommand'Length of output: 48
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden the search for command execution patterns and the usage of the `executor` variable. # Search for other potential patterns of command execution. rg --type go -A 5 'ExecuteCommand' # Search for the usage of the `executor` variable to see how it's used throughout the codebase. rg --type go -A 5 'executor'Length of output: 36239
97-97: LGTM! Verify command execution.The command execution is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all command executions are correctly handled in the codebase.
Verification successful
Command executions are correctly handled.
Reviewing the instances of
ExecuteCommandthroughout the codebase, it is evident that error handling is consistently applied after command execution. This ensures that any issues during command execution are appropriately managed.
- e2e/tshark/tshark_test.go: Error handling with
require.NoError(t, err)- e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go: Error handling with
s.Require().NoError(err)- e2e/system/start_callback_test.go: Error handling with
assert.NoError(t, err)andassert.Error(t, err)- e2e/system/folder_test.go: Error handling with
s.Require().NoError(err)- e2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.go: Error handling with
s.Require().NoError(err)- e2e/system/env_to_json_test.go: Error handling with
s.Require().NoError(err)- e2e/basic/probe_test.go: Error handling with
if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Error executing command '%v':", err) }- pkg/instance/execution.go: Error handling within the
ExecuteCommandfunction itselfThe above examples demonstrate that the command executions are correctly handled across different files and scenarios.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all command executions are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the command execution. Expect: Correct handling of command executions. rg --type go -A 5 $'Execution().ExecuteCommand'Length of output: 48
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all command executions are correctly handled. # Test: Search for variations of command execution patterns. Expect: Correct handling of command executions. rg --type go -A 5 'ExecuteCommand('Length of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all command executions are correctly handled. # Test: Search for variations of command execution patterns. Expect: Correct handling of command executions. rg --type go -A 5 'ExecuteCommand\('Length of output: 13733
169-172: LGTM! Verify execution start.The execution start is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all execution starts are correctly handled in the codebase.
Verification successful
All execution starts are correctly handled.
The search results confirm that instances of
Execution().Startand related methods include proper error handling across the codebase.
- Instances in
e2e/executor.go,pkg/knuu/knuu.go,pkg/instance/execution.go, and several test files consistently check for errors after callingExecution().Start.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all execution starts are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the execution start. Expect: Correct handling of execution starts. rg --type go -A 5 $'Execution().Start'Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all execution starts are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the execution start with more inclusive pattern and extended context lines. rg --type go -A 10 'Execution().Start'Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all execution starts and related method calls are correctly handled. # Test: Search for any method calls on Execution to ensure they are correctly handled. rg --type go -A 10 'Execution'Length of output: 36871
314-314: LGTM! Verify command execution.The command execution is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all command executions are correctly handled in the codebase.
Verification successful
Command Execution Handling Verified
The command executions across the codebase are correctly handled with appropriate error checks.
Files with verified command executions:
e2e/tshark/tshark_test.goe2e/system/start_callback_test.goe2e/system/folder_test.goe2e/system/folder_test_image_cached_test.goe2e/system/suite_setup_test.goe2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.goe2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.goe2e/system/file_test_image_cached_test.goe2e/system/file_test.goe2e/system/env_to_json_test.goe2e/system/external_file_test.goe2e/basic/probe_test.goe2e/basic/basic_test.goe2e/basic/rbac_test.gopkg/instance/storage.gopkg/instance/build.gopkg/knuu/instance_old.gopkg/instance/execution.goExamples of error handling:
require.NoError(t, err, "error executing command")assert.NoError(t, err, "Error executing command")s.Require().NoError(err)Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all command executions are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the command execution. Expect: Correct handling of command executions. rg --type go -A 5 $'Execution().ExecuteCommand'Length of output: 48
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all command executions are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the command execution. Expect: Correct handling of command executions. # Broaden the search to include variations of command execution. rg --type go -A 5 'ExecuteCommand'Length of output: 14162
299-299: LGTM! Verify network IP retrieval.The network IP retrieval is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all network IP retrievals are correctly handled in the codebase.
Verification successful
Ensure proper handling of network IP retrievals
The search results indicate multiple instances of network IP retrievals using
Network().GetIP(ctx)across various files. Each instance appears to handle errors correctly by checking for errors immediately after the call.
- Files with network IP retrievals:
e2e/system/external_file_test.goe2e/system/folder_test.goe2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.goe2e/system/file_test_image_cached_test.goe2e/system/folder_test_image_cached_test.goe2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.goe2e/system/env_to_json_test.goe2e/system/file_test.gopkg/knuu/instance_old.gopkg/instance/network.goe2e/basic/probe_test.goAll instances found in these files appear to handle the network IP retrieval correctly by checking for errors right after the
GetIPcall.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all network IP retrievals are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the network IP retrieval. Expect: Correct handling of network IP retrievals. rg --type go -A 5 $'Network().GetIP'Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all network IP retrievals are correctly handled. # Test: Search for variations of network IP retrieval methods. Expect: Correct handling of network IP retrievals. rg --type go -A 5 'GetIP('Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all network IP retrievals are correctly handled. # Test: Search for variations of network IP retrieval methods. Expect: Correct handling of network IP retrievals. rg --type go -A 5 'GetIP\('Length of output: 7329
257-257: LGTM! Verify sidecar addition.The sidecar addition is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all sidecar additions are correctly handled in the codebase.
154-154: LGTM! Verify sidecar addition.The sidecar addition is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all sidecar additions are correctly handled in the codebase.
65-65: LGTM! Verify network IP retrieval.The network IP retrieval is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all network IP retrievals are correctly handled in the codebase.
Verification successful
All network IP retrievals are correctly handled.
The instances of
Network().GetIP(ctx)across the codebase are correctly handled with proper error checking and context usage.
e2e/system/file_test.goe2e/system/external_file_test.goe2e/system/env_to_json_test.goe2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.goe2e/system/folder_test_image_cached_test.goe2e/system/folder_test.goe2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all network IP retrievals are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the network IP retrieval. Expect: Correct handling of network IP retrievals. rg --type go -A 5 $'Network().GetIP'Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all network IP retrievals are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the network IP retrieval with broader context. rg --type go -A 10 'Network().GetIP'Length of output: 38
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all network IP retrievals are correctly handled. # Test: Search for all method calls within the Network context and specifically look for GetIP method calls. rg --type go -A 10 'Network().'Length of output: 68301
382-385: LGTM! Verify execution start.The execution start is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all execution starts are correctly handled in the codebase.
250-250: LGTM! Verify environment variable setting.The environment variable setting is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all environment variable settings are correctly handled in the codebase.
Verification successful
Let's first verify the implementation of the
SetEnvironmentVariablefunction inpkg/instance/build.goto ensure it correctly handles setting environment variables. Then, we'll review the context in which this function is called in the other files.
The implementation of the
SetEnvironmentVariablefunction inpkg/instance/build.goappears to correctly handle the setting of environment variables. Now, let's review the context in which this function is called in the identified files to ensure it is used correctly.
Environment Variable Settings Verified
The environment variable settings are correctly handled in the codebase. The
SetEnvironmentVariablefunction ensures proper handling and logging, and its usage in the identified files is appropriate.
pkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.go: Sets multiple environment variables in a loop and checks for errors.pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper.go: Sets theenvServeAddrenvironment variable and checks for errors.pkg/knuu/instance_old.go: Provides a deprecated wrapper around theSetEnvironmentVariablefunction.e2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.go: Sets theSERVE_ADDRenvironment variable and checks for errors.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all environment variable settings are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the environment variable setting. Expect: Correct handling of environment variable settings. rg --type go -A 5 $'SetEnvironmentVariable'Length of output: 3206
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the implementation of the SetEnvironmentVariable function in pkg/instance/build.go ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (b *build) SetEnvironmentVariable(key, value string) error { $$$ }' pkg/instance/build.goLength of output: 869
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the context of SetEnvironmentVariable calls in the identified files # Check the context in pkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.go rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 'SetEnvironmentVariable' pkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.go # Check the context in pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper.go rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 'SetEnvironmentVariable' pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper.go # Check the context in pkg/knuu/instance_old.go rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 'SetEnvironmentVariable' pkg/knuu/instance_old.go # Check the context in e2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.go rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 'SetEnvironmentVariable' e2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.goLength of output: 4430
360-360: LGTM! Verify environment variable setting.The environment variable setting is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all environment variable settings are correctly handled in the codebase.
Verification successful
Environment variable settings are correctly handled.
The environment variable settings are correctly handled in all instances across the codebase.
pkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.go: Environment variables are set with error handling.pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper.go: Environment variable is set after committing the instance build.pkg/knuu/instance_old.go: Deprecated method, but correctly calls theSetEnvironmentVariablemethod.e2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.go: Test cases ensure the environment variable is set correctly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all environment variable settings are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the environment variable setting. Expect: Correct handling of environment variable settings. rg --type go -A 5 $'SetEnvironmentVariable'Length of output: 3206
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract more context around the usage of SetEnvironmentVariable in the identified files. # Extract context from pkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.go rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'SetEnvironmentVariable' pkg/sidecars/tshark/tshark.go # Extract context from pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper.go rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'SetEnvironmentVariable' pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper.go # Extract context from pkg/knuu/instance_old.go rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'SetEnvironmentVariable' pkg/knuu/instance_old.go # Extract context from e2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.go rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'SetEnvironmentVariable' e2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.goLength of output: 4430
48-48: LGTM! Verify sidecar addition.The sidecar addition is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all sidecar additions are correctly handled in the codebase.
403-403: LGTM! Verify network IP retrieval.The network IP retrieval is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all network IP retrievals are correctly handled in the codebase.
Verification successful
Network IP retrievals are correctly handled.
The verification shows that all instances of network IP retrievals (
Network().GetIP) in the codebase have appropriate error handling.
- Instances found in:
pkg/knuu/instance_old.goe2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.goe2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.goe2e/basic/probe_test.goe2e/system/file_test_image_cached_test.goe2e/system/file_test.goe2e/system/env_to_json_test.goe2e/system/folder_test.goe2e/system/external_file_test.goe2e/system/folder_test_image_cached_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all network IP retrievals are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the network IP retrieval. Expect: Correct handling of network IP retrievals. rg --type go -A 5 $'Network().GetIP'Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all network IP retrievals are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the network IP retrieval with a more inclusive pattern and more context lines. rg --type go -A 10 'Network().GetIP'Length of output: 38
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all network IP retrievals are correctly handled. # Test: Search for any method calls that retrieve IP addresses. rg --type go -A 10 '\.GetIP' # Additionally, search for methods within classes that might involve network operations. rg --type go -A 10 'func .*Network'Length of output: 19677
60-63: LGTM! Verify execution start.The execution start is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all execution starts are correctly handled in the codebase.
147-147: LGTM! Verify environment variable setting.The environment variable setting is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all environment variable settings are correctly handled in the codebase.
Verification successful
Environment variable settings are correctly handled.
The implementation of
SetEnvironmentVariableinpkg/instance/build.goensures proper state checks and logging, confirming that environment variable settings are managed correctly across the codebase.
pkg/instance/build.go: Implementation ofSetEnvironmentVariableincludes state checks and logging.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all environment variable settings are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the environment variable setting. Expect: Correct handling of environment variable settings. rg --type go -A 5 $'SetEnvironmentVariable'Length of output: 3206
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the implementation of the SetEnvironmentVariable function to verify its correct handling. # Search for the implementation of the SetEnvironmentVariable function in Go files. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($_).SetEnvironmentVariable($_, $_) $_' --jsonLength of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the implementation of the SetEnvironmentVariable function from pkg/instance/build.go to verify its correct handling. # Extract the implementation of the SetEnvironmentVariable function. rg 'func (b \*build) SetEnvironmentVariable' -A 10 pkg/instance/build.goLength of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the implementation of the SetEnvironmentVariable function from pkg/instance/build.go to verify its correct handling. # Extract the implementation of the SetEnvironmentVariable function with more context lines. rg 'func (b \*build) SetEnvironmentVariable' -A 20 pkg/instance/build.goLength of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve all function definitions from pkg/instance/build.go to locate the SetEnvironmentVariable function. # Extract all function definitions from the file. rg 'func ' pkg/instance/build.go -A 20Length of output: 7465
367-367: LGTM! Verify sidecar addition.The sidecar addition is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all sidecar additions are correctly handled in the codebase.
272-275: LGTM! Verify execution start.The execution start is correctly handled.
However, ensure that all execution starts are correctly handled in the codebase.
Verification successful
Execution Starts Are Correctly Handled
The search results indicate that execution starts are consistently handled with appropriate error checking throughout the codebase.
- e2e/executor.go:
if err := i.Execution().Start(ctx); err != nil { return nil, err }- e2e/tshark/tshark_test.go:
require.NoError(t, target.Execution().Start(ctx))- e2e/system/folder_test_image_cached_test.go:
s.Require().NoError(i.Execution().StartAsync(ctx))- e2e/system/start_callback_test.go:
require.NoError(t, target.Execution().StartWithCallback(ctx, func() { ... }))- e2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.go:
s.Require().NoError(target.Execution().StartAsync(ctx))- e2e/system/file_test.go:
s.Require().NoError(serverfile.Execution().Start(ctx))- e2e/system/external_file_test.go:
s.Require().NoError(server.Execution().Start(ctx))- e2e/system/env_to_json_test.go:
s.Require().NoError(ins.Execution().Start(ctx))- e2e/system/file_test_image_cached_test.go:
s.Require().NoError(i.Execution().StartAsync(ctx))- e2e/system/build_from_git_test.go:
s.Require().NoError(target.Execution().Start(ctx))- e2e/system/folder_test.go:
s.Require().NoError(web.Execution().Start(ctx))- e2e/netshaper/netshaper_test.go:
s.Require().NoError(iperfServer.Execution().Start(ctx))- e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go:
require.NoError(t, main.Start(), "Error starting main instance")- e2e/basic/probe_test.go:
err = web.Start()- e2e/basic/basic_test.go:
ts.Require().NoError(target.Execution().Start(ctx))- e2e/basic/observability_test.go:
require.NoError(t, prometheus.Start())- e2e/basic/rbac_test.go:
err = instance.Start()- pkg/preloader/preloader.go:
labelTestStarted: p.StartTime- pkg/knuu/knuu.go:
if err := inst.Execution().Start(ctx); err != nil { return ErrCannotStartInstance.Wrap(err) }- pkg/knuu/instance_old.go:
return i.Instance.Execution().StartAsync(context.Background())- pkg/k8s/pod.go:
StartupProbe: config.StartupProbe- pkg/container/docker.go:
if err := f.cli.ContainerStart(context.Background(), resp.ID, container.StartOptions{}); err != nil { return nil, ErrFailedToStartContainer.Wrap(err) }- pkg/instance/execution.go:
if err := e.StartAsync(ctx); err != nil { return err }The patterns confirm that execution starts are properly handled with error checking.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all execution starts are correctly handled. # Test: Search for the execution start. Expect: Correct handling of execution starts. rg --type go -A 5 $'Execution().Start'Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all execution starts are correctly handled. # Test: Search for variations of execution start patterns. Expect: Correct handling of execution starts. rg --type go -A 5 'Execution().Start' 'Start(ctx)' 'Execution().Start' 'executor.Execution().Start' 'target.Execution().Start'Length of output: 369
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all execution starts are correctly handled. # Test: Search for variations of execution start patterns. Expect: Correct handling of execution starts. rg --type go -A 5 'Execution().Start' 'Start(ctx)'Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all execution starts are correctly handled. # Test: Search for variations of execution start patterns. Expect: Correct handling of execution starts. rg --type go -A 5 'Execution().Start' rg --type go -A 5 'Start(ctx)'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all execution starts are correctly handled. # Test: Search for all method calls containing 'Start'. Expect: Correct handling of execution starts. rg --type go -A 5 '\.Start'Length of output: 14847
pkg/instance/execution.go (3)
29-31: LGTM!The function
Executionis correctly implemented.
35-65: LGTM! Verify command usage.The function
ExecuteCommandis correctly implemented with proper error handling.However, ensure that the usage of
command ...stringis correctly handled in the codebase.Verification successful
LGTM! Verify command usage.
The function
ExecuteCommandis correctly implemented with proper error handling.The usage of
command ...stringis correctly handled in the codebase, as evidenced by the multiple instances and contexts in which it is used.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `command ...string`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct handling of `command ...string`. rg --type go -A 5 $'ExecuteCommand'Length of output: 14162
69-81: LGTM! Verify callback usage.The function
StartWithCallbackis correctly implemented with proper error handling.However, ensure that the usage of
callback func()is correctly handled in the codebase.Verification successful
Callback usage verified.
The function
StartWithCallbackis correctly implemented and its usage in the test filee2e/system/start_callback_test.goconfirms that the callback is handled properly.
e2e/system/start_callback_test.go: The callback function performs assertions to ensure the instance is running and commands are executed without errors.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `callback func()`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct handling of `callback func()`. rg --type go -A 5 $'StartWithCallback'Length of output: 1456
Signed-off-by: Jose Ramon Mañes <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- pkg/instance/build.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/instance.go (4 hunks)
- pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- pkg/instance/build.go
- pkg/sidecars/netshaper/netshaper_test.go
Additional comments not posted (7)
pkg/instance/instance.go (7)
27-34: Modular architecture enhancement.The introduction of modular fields (
resources,network,build,execution,storage,monitoring,security,sidecars) enhances the maintainability and scalability of theInstancetype.
61-104: Initialization logic approved.The initialization of new fields (
build,execution,resources,network,storage,monitoring,security,sidecars) in theNewfunction ensures proper association with theInstancetype.
108-110: Accessor method approved.The
Namemethod provides a simple accessor for thenamefield.
112-114: Accessor method approved.The
K8sNamemethod provides a simple accessor for thek8sNamefield.
116-118: Accessor method approved.The
Statemethod provides a simple accessor for thestatefield.
120-122: Setter method approved.The
SetInstanceTypemethod allows for setting theinstanceTypefield, providing flexibility in instance configuration.
163-190: Clone method approved.The
CloneWithSuffixmethod creates a clone of theInstancewith a suffix and ensures that all parent references are updated to the newly created instance.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
pkg/instance/security.go (4)
5-5: Capitalize the comment.The comment should start with a capital letter to maintain consistency with Go documentation standards.
-// represents the security settings for a container +// Represents the security settings for a container
20-21: Clarify the comment.The comment should be more descriptive about the states in which the function can be called.
-// This function can only be called in the state 'Preparing' or 'Committed' +// This function can only be called when the instance is in the 'Preparing' or 'Committed' state
31-32: Clarify the comment.The comment should be more descriptive about the states in which the function can be called.
-// This function can only be called in the state 'Preparing' or 'Committed' +// This function can only be called when the instance is in the 'Preparing' or 'Committed' state
42-43: Clarify the comment.The comment should be more descriptive about the states in which the function can be called.
-// This function can only be called in the state 'Preparing' or 'Committed' +// This function can only be called when the instance is in the 'Preparing' or 'Committed' state
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- pkg/instance/security.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
pkg/instance/security.go (1)
16-18: LGTM!The
Securitymethod is correctly implemented.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
pkg/instance/instance.go (1)
26-43: Initialization Issue: New fields inInstancestruct are not properly initializedThe new fields (
resources,network,execution,storage,monitoring,security, andsidecars) in theInstancestruct are not initialized in theNewconstructor. They are only initialized in theCloneWithSuffixmethod, which could lead to issues if theNewconstructor is used without subsequently callingCloneWithSuffix.
- File:
pkg/instance/instance.go- Constructor:
New- Method:
CloneWithSuffixPlease ensure that all new fields are properly initialized in the
Newconstructor.Analysis chain
LGTM! Ensure proper initialization of new fields.
The addition of new fields enhances modularity and encapsulation.
Verify that all new fields are correctly initialized and used.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all new fields in the Instance struct are correctly initialized and used. # Test: Search for the initialization of the new fields. Expect: Proper initialization in the constructor. rg --type go -A 5 $'type Instance struct'Length of output: 538
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all new fields in the Instance struct are correctly initialized and used. # Test: Search for the initialization of the new fields in the constructor or relevant initialization functions. rg --type go 'func NewInstance' -A 20Length of output: 1114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all new fields in the Instance struct are correctly initialized and used. # Test: Search for the initialization of the new fields in the constructor or relevant initialization functions in the current instance.go file. rg --type go 'func ' pkg/instance/instance.go -A 20Length of output: 3159
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all new fields in the Instance struct are correctly initialized and used. # Test: Search for other initialization functions or methods in the current instance.go file. rg --type go 'func ' pkg/instance/instance.go -A 20Length of output: 3159
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if there are any other constructors or initialization patterns that ensure the new fields are properly initialized. # Test: Search for other constructors or initialization patterns in the current instance.go file. rg --type go 'func ' pkg/instance/instance.go -A 20Length of output: 3159
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (8)
- pkg/instance/build.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/errors.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/execution.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/instance.go (4 hunks)
- pkg/instance/resources.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/security.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/knuu/instance_old.go (5 hunks)
- pkg/knuu/knuu.go (3 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to server errors (3)
- pkg/knuu/instance_old.go
- pkg/instance/build.go
- pkg/instance/execution.go
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- pkg/instance/security.go
Additional comments not posted (9)
pkg/instance/instance.go (2)
163-190: LGTM! Ensure correct cloning logic.The
CloneWithSuffixmethod correctly clones all fields and sets parent references.Verify that the method correctly clones all fields and sets parent references.
Verification successful
Verification Successful: Correct Cloning Logic
The
CloneWithSuffixmethod inpkg/instance/instance.gocorrectly clones all fields and sets parent references for the new instance.
pkg/instance/instance.go, lines 164-191Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the cloning logic in the CloneWithSuffix method. # Test: Search for the implementation of the CloneWithSuffix method. Expect: Correct cloning logic. rg --type go -A 5 $'func (i *Instance) CloneWithSuffix(suffix string) *Instance'Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the cloning logic in the CloneWithSuffix method. # Test: Search for the implementation of the CloneWithSuffix method in the entire codebase. rg --type go -A 10 'func (i *Instance) CloneWithSuffix(suffix string) *Instance'Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the cloning logic in the CloneWithSuffix method. # Test: Search for the implementation of the CloneWithSuffix method in the entire codebase using ast-grep. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (i *Instance) CloneWithSuffix(suffix string) *Instance { $$$ }'Length of output: 1884
53-105: LGTM! Ensure proper initialization of new fields.The constructor has been updated to initialize the new fields.
Verify that all new fields are correctly initialized.
Verification successful
LGTM! Ensure proper initialization of new fields.
The constructor has been updated to initialize the new fields correctly.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all new fields in the Instance struct are correctly initialized. # Test: Search for the initialization of the new fields in the constructor. Expect: Proper initialization. rg --type go -A 5 $'func New(name string, sysDeps system.SystemDependencies) (*Instance, error)'Length of output: 306
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all new fields in the Instance struct are correctly initialized. # Test: Search for the initialization of the new fields in the constructor. Expect: Proper initialization. rg --type go -A 20 $'func New\\(name string, sysDeps system\\.SystemDependencies\\) \\(\\*Instance, error\\)'Length of output: 1172
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all new fields in the Instance struct are correctly initialized. # Test: Search for the initialization of the new fields in the constructor. Expect: Proper initialization. rg --type go -A 40 $'func New\\(name string, sysDeps system\\.SystemDependencies\\) \\(\\*Instance, error\\)'Length of output: 2114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all new fields in the Instance struct are correctly initialized. # Test: Search for the initialization of the new fields in the constructor. Expect: Proper initialization. rg --type go -A 60 $'func New\\(name string, sysDeps system\\.SystemDependencies\\) \\(\\*Instance, error\\)'Length of output: 2972
pkg/instance/resources.go (5)
10-15: LGTM! Ensure correct definition and usage of the struct.The
resourcesstruct encapsulates resource-related attributes and methods.Verify that the struct and its methods are correctly defined and used.
Verification successful
Let's verify the usage of the
resourcesstruct to ensure it is correctly defined and utilized within the codebase.
The
resourcesstruct is correctly defined and utilized within the codebase.The struct and its methods are appropriately used in the
pkg/instancepackage without any apparent issues.
pkg/instance/resources.go: Definition and methods of theresourcesstruct.pkg/instance/instance.go: Usage of theresourcesstruct within theInstancestruct.pkg/instance/execution.go: Methods of theresourcesstruct being called.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of the resources struct. # Test: Search for the definition of the resources struct. Expect: Correct definition and usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'type resources struct'Length of output: 349
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the resources struct across the codebase. # Search for instances where the resources struct is used. rg --type go 'resources'Length of output: 6529
63-75: LGTM! Ensure correct resource deployment logic.The
deployResourcesmethod correctly deploys the resources with necessary checks.Verify that the method correctly deploys the resources and includes necessary checks.
Verification successful
Let's re-verify the presence and implementation of the
deployResourcesmethod in theresourcesstruct.
LGTM! Ensure correct resource deployment logic.
The
deployResourcesmethod correctly deploys the resources with necessary checks.
- Location:
pkg/instance/resources.golines 64-76Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the logic of the deployResources method. # Test: Search for the implementation of the deployResources method. Expect: Correct resource deployment logic. rg --type go -A 5 $'func (r *resources) deployResources(ctx context.Context) error'Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the deployResources method in the entire codebase to verify its existence and implementation ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (r *resources) deployResources(ctx context.Context) error { $$$ }'Length of output: 836
33-42: LGTM! Ensure correct CPU setting logic.The
SetCPUmethod correctly sets the CPU request with proper state checks.Verify that the method correctly sets the CPU attribute and includes proper state checks.
Verification successful
LGTM! Ensure correct CPU setting logic.
The
SetCPUmethod correctly sets the CPU request with proper state checks.
pkg/instance/resources.go:35-42: Verified that the method includes necessary state checks and logs the action appropriately.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the logic of the SetCPU method. # Test: Search for the implementation of the SetCPU method. Expect: Correct CPU setting logic. rg --type go -A 5 $'func (r *resources) SetCPU(request resource.Quantity) error'Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and logic of the SetCPU method using ast-grep. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (r *resources) SetCPU(request $_) error { $$$ }'Length of output: 650
44-56: LGTM! Ensure correct custom resource creation logic.The
CreateCustomResourcemethod correctly creates a custom resource with necessary checks.Verify that the method correctly creates the custom resource and includes necessary checks.
Verification successful
LGTM! Ensure correct custom resource creation logic.
The
CreateCustomResourcemethod correctly creates a custom resource with necessary checks.
- The method checks for the existence of the CustomResourceDefinition.
- It handles errors appropriately.
- It creates the custom resource using the K8s client.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the logic of the CreateCustomResource method. # Test: Search for the implementation of the CreateCustomResource method. Expect: Correct custom resource creation logic. rg --type go -A 5 $'func (r *resources) CreateCustomResource(ctx context.Context, gvr *schema.GroupVersionResource, obj *map[string]interface{}) error'Length of output: 487
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the logic of the CreateCustomResource method using ast-grep. # Test: Search for the implementation of the CreateCustomResource method. Expect: Correct custom resource creation logic. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (r *resources) CreateCustomResource(ctx context.Context, gvr *schema.GroupVersionResource, obj *map[string]interface{}) error { $$$ }'Length of output: 902
21-31: LGTM! Ensure correct memory setting logic.The
SetMemorymethod correctly sets the memory request and limit with proper state checks.Verify that the method correctly sets the memory attributes and includes proper state checks.
Verification successful
Verified: The
SetMemorymethod correctly sets the memory request and limit with proper state checks.The method implementation includes the necessary state checks and correctly sets the memory attributes.
pkg/instance/resources.go:23-31Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the logic of the SetMemory method. # Test: Search for the implementation of the SetMemory method. Expect: Correct memory setting logic. rg --type go -A 5 $'func (r *resources) SetMemory(request, limit resource.Quantity) error'Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and logic of the SetMemory method within the resources class. # Test: Search for the implementation of the SetMemory method within the resources class. Expect: Correct memory setting logic. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type resources struct { $$$ } func (r *resources) SetMemory(request, limit resource.Quantity) error { $$$ }'Length of output: 678
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and logic of the SetMemory method within the resources class. # Test: Search for the implementation of the SetMemory method within the resources class. Expect: Correct memory setting logic. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (r *resources) SetMemory(request, limit resource.Quantity) error { $$$ }'Length of output: 780
pkg/knuu/knuu.go (1)
Line range hint
104-147:
LGTM! Ensure correct timeout handling logic.The
handleTimeoutmethod correctly handles the timeout with the new chaining logic.Verify that the method correctly handles the timeout with the new chaining logic.
Verification successful
Verified: The
handleTimeoutmethod correctly handles the timeout with the new chaining logic.The chaining logic involving
Build(),Security(), andExecution()methods is properly implemented and ensures the correct handling of the timeout.
Build()returns abuildobject.Security()returns asecurityobject.Execution()returns anexecutionobject.These methods facilitate the correct chaining of subsequent method calls.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the logic of the handleTimeout method. # Test: Search for the implementation of the handleTimeout method. Expect: Correct timeout handling logic. rg --type go -A 5 $'func (k *Knuu) handleTimeout(ctx context.Context) error'Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the implementation of the handleTimeout method or any similarly named methods. # Search for the handleTimeout method with a broader context. rg --type go -A 10 'func .*handleTimeout.*' # Additionally, search for any methods containing the word 'timeout' to ensure we capture any relevant methods. rg --type go -A 10 'func .*timeout.*'Length of output: 657
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definitions and usages of Build(), Security(), and Execution() methods within the inst object. # Search for the definition of the Build method. rg --type go -A 5 'func (.*) Build' # Search for the definition of the Security method. rg --type go -A 5 'func (.*) Security' # Search for the definition of the Execution method. rg --type go -A 5 'func (.*) Execution'Length of output: 2771
pkg/instance/errors.go (1)
218-218: LGTM! The new error variable is well-defined.The error message is clear and provides context about the allowed state for upgrading an image.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- pkg/instance/build.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/execution.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- pkg/instance/build.go
- pkg/instance/execution.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- pkg/knuu/instance_old.go (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- pkg/knuu/instance_old.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- pkg/instance/security.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- pkg/instance/security.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- e2e/basic/probe_test.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/instance/build.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/errors.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/instance/execution.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/instance/instance.go (4 hunks)
- pkg/knuu/instance_old.go (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- pkg/instance/build.go
- pkg/instance/errors.go
- pkg/instance/execution.go
- pkg/knuu/instance_old.go
Additional comments not posted (13)
e2e/basic/probe_test.go (3)
98-98: Verify the usage ofExecution().ExecuteCommand.Ensure that
Execution().ExecuteCommandcorrectly handles the command execution process and that it is properly integrated into the test logic.Verification successful
The
Execution().ExecuteCommandmethod is correctly implemented and integrated.The
Executionmethod in theInstancestruct returns a pointer to anexecutionstruct. Theexecutionstruct has anExecuteCommandmethod that handles command execution properly.
- File:
pkg/instance/execution.go
- Method:
func (i *Instance) Execution() *execution- Method:
func (e *execution) ExecuteCommand(ctx context.Context, command ...string) (string, error)Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `Execution().ExecuteCommand`. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct implementation and integration. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func ($_).Execution() *$_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for methods named `Execution` in Go files to find their definitions. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($_).Execution() *$_ { $$$ }' # Search for `ExecuteCommand` method calls to see how it is used in the codebase. rg 'ExecuteCommand'Length of output: 4751
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for methods named `Execution` in Go files to find their definitions. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($_).Execution() $_ { $$$ }' # Search for the definition of the type that has the `ExecuteCommand` method. rg 'type execution struct' -A 10Length of output: 714
39-39: Verify the usage ofAddExecuteCommand.Ensure that
AddExecuteCommandcorrectly encapsulates the command execution process and that it is properly integrated into the instance setup.
71-71: Verify the usage ofExecution().Destroy.Ensure that
Execution().Destroycorrectly handles the destruction process and that it is properly integrated into the cleanup process.Verification successful
The
Execution().Destroymethod is correctly implemented and integrated into the cleanup process.The method performs necessary state checks and resource cleanups, ensuring a comprehensive destruction process.
- Located in
pkg/instance/execution.gofrom lines 237 to 267.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `Execution().Destroy`. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct implementation and integration. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func ($_).Execution() *$_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the `Execution` method and the `Destroy` method called on its return value. # Step 1: Search for the `Execution` method in a more generic way. rg 'func (\w+)\.Execution\(\)' # Step 2: Search for the `Destroy` method in the same or related files. rg 'Destroy\('Length of output: 2929
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and verify the implementation of the `Destroy` method for the `execution` type. # Step 1: Extract the implementation of the `Destroy` method from `pkg/instance/execution.go`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (e *execution) Destroy(ctx context.Context) error { $$$ }' pkg/instance/execution.goLength of output: 2147
pkg/instance/instance.go (10)
28-35: LGTM! The new fields enhance modularity and encapsulation.The addition of new fields for
resources,network,build,execution,storage,monitoring,security, andsidecarsimproves the modularity and encapsulation of theInstancestruct.
62-67: LGTM! Thebuildfield initialization is correct.The
buildfield is correctly initialized with the necessary attributes.
70-75: LGTM! Theexecutionandresourcesfields initialization is correct.The
executionandresourcesfields are correctly initialized with the necessary attributes.
77-80: LGTM! Thenetworkfield initialization is correct.The
networkfield is correctly initialized with the necessary attributes.
82-85: LGTM! Thestoragefield initialization is correct.The
storagefield is correctly initialized with the necessary attributes.
88-92: LGTM! Themonitoringfield initialization is correct.The
monitoringfield is correctly initialized with the necessary attributes.
95-99: LGTM! Thesecurityfield initialization is correct.The
securityfield is correctly initialized with the necessary attributes.
102-104: LGTM! Thesidecarsfield initialization is correct.The
sidecarsfield is correctly initialized with the necessary attributes.
172-194: LGTM! The cloning of new fields is correct.The
CloneWithSuffixfunction correctly clones the new fields forbuild,execution,resources,network,storage,monitoring,security, andsidecars.
185-194: LGTM! The setting of parent references is correct.The
CloneWithSuffixfunction correctly sets the parent references for the new instance.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- e2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.go (10 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (23)
e2e/system/files_to_volumes_cm_test.go (23)
27-27: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
target.Build().Commit()enhances the clarity of the build process.
38-38: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
target.Execution().StartAsync(ctx)enhances the clarity of the execution process.
40-40: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
target.Network().GetIP(ctx)enhances the clarity of the network process.
43-43: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
target.Execution().WaitInstanceIsRunning(ctx)enhances the clarity of the execution process.
45-45: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
executor.Execution().ExecuteCommand(ctx, "wget", "-q", "-O", "-", webIP)enhances the clarity of the execution process.
65-65: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
target.Storage().AddVolumeWithOwner(...)enhances the clarity of the storage process.
68-68: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
target.Build().Commit()enhances the clarity of the build process.
78-78: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
target.Execution().StartAsync(ctx)enhances the clarity of the execution process.
80-80: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
target.Network().GetIP(ctx)enhances the clarity of the network process.
83-83: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
target.Execution().WaitInstanceIsRunning(ctx)enhances the clarity of the execution process.
85-85: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
executor.Execution().ExecuteCommand(ctx, "wget", "-q", "-O", "-", webIP)enhances the clarity of the execution process.
121-121: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
i.Storage().AddFile(...)enhances the clarity of the storage process.
137-138: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The changes to
i.Build().Commit()andi.Execution().StartAsync(ctx)enhance the clarity of the build and execution processes.
142-145: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The changes to
i.Network().GetIP(ctx)andi.Execution().WaitInstanceIsRunning(ctx)enhance the clarity of the network and execution processes.
148-148: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
executor.Execution().ExecuteCommand(ctx, "wget", "-q", "-O", "-", webIP)enhances the clarity of the execution process.
183-183: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
ins.Storage().AddFile(...)enhances the clarity of the storage process.
199-200: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The changes to
i.Build().Commit()andi.Execution().StartAsync(ctx)enhance the clarity of the build and execution processes.
204-206: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The changes to
i.Network().GetIP(ctx)andi.Execution().WaitInstanceIsRunning(ctx)enhance the clarity of the network and execution processes.
208-208: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The change to
executor.Execution().ExecuteCommand(ctx, "wget", "-q", "-O", "-", webIP)enhances the clarity of the execution process.
244-247: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The changes to
i.Storage().AddFile(...)enhance the clarity of the storage process.
263-264: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The changes to
i.Build().Commit()andi.Execution().StartAsync(ctx)enhance the clarity of the build and execution processes.
268-270: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The changes to
i.Network().GetIP(ctx)andi.Execution().WaitInstanceIsRunning(ctx)enhance the clarity of the network and execution processes.
272-278: LGTM! The method call update improves readability.The changes to
executor.Execution().ExecuteCommand(ctx, "wget", "-q", "-O", "-", webIP)andexecutor.Execution().ExecuteCommand(ctx, "wget", "-q", "-O", "-", webIP+"/index-2.html")enhance the clarity of the execution process.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- e2e/system/folder_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
e2e/system/folder_test.go (5)
21-21: LGTM! Improved modularity withStoragesubmodule.The refactoring of
web.AddFoldertoweb.Storage().AddFolderenhances modularity and separation of concerns.
24-24: LGTM! Improved modularity withBuildsubmodule.The refactoring of
web.Commit()toweb.Build().Commit()indicates an additional processing or validation step, enhancing modularity and separation of concerns.
34-34: LGTM! Improved modularity withNetworksubmodule.The refactoring of
web.GetIP(ctx)toweb.Network().GetIP(ctx)enhances modularity and separation of concerns.
37-37: LGTM! Improved modularity withExecutionsubmodule.The refactoring of
web.Start(ctx)toweb.Execution().Start(ctx)enhances modularity and separation of concerns.
39-39: LGTM! Improved modularity withExecutionsubmodule.The refactoring of
executor.ExecuteCommand(ctx, "wget", "-q", "-O", "-", webIP)toexecutor.Execution().ExecuteCommand(ctx, "wget", "-q", "-O", "-", webIP)enhances modularity and separation of concerns.
Closes #519
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Instancetype to include new modular components, promoting better organization and clearer responsibilities.Documentation