chore: added k8s validation on user inputs #536
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update significantly enhances the robustness of Kubernetes operations by integrating comprehensive validation checks across various functions, including the creation of ConfigMaps, custom resources, and services. The introduction of dedicated validation functions ensures that inputs conform to specific criteria, helping to prevent runtime errors and improving overall error handling. Additionally, new error variables have been defined to capture specific validation failures, streamlining troubleshooting efforts. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ConfigMapValidator
participant ResourceHandler
Client->>ConfigMapValidator: validateConfigMap(name, labels, data)
alt Validation Passes
ConfigMapValidator-->>Client: success
Client->>ResourceHandler: CreateConfigMap(...)
ResourceHandler-->>Client: ConfigMap Created
else Validation Fails
ConfigMapValidator-->>Client: error
end
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
pkg/k8s/service.go (1)
60-71: Missing test cases for validation functions.The validation functions
validateServiceName,validateLabels,validateSelectorMap, andvalidatePortsare correctly implemented inpkg/k8s/validate.go. However, there are no test cases found for these functions. It is essential to add test cases to ensure their correctness and robustness.
- Add test cases for
validateServiceName.- Add test cases for
validateLabels.- Add test cases for
validateSelectorMap.- Add test cases for
validatePorts.Analysis chain
Validation checks added to
PatchService.The added validation checks ensure the integrity of the service name, labels, selector map, and ports before proceeding with patching. This enhances robustness by preventing invalid inputs from being processed.
Ensure that the validation functions
validateServiceName,validateLabels,validateSelectorMap, andvalidatePortsare correctly implemented and tested.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and correctness of the validation functions. # Test: Search for the validation functions. Expect: Functions are correctly implemented. rg --type go 'func validateServiceName|func validateLabels|func validateSelectorMap|func validatePorts'Length of output: 389
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the implementation of the validation functions and check for their test cases. # Step 1: Display the implementation of the validation functions. echo "Implementations of the validation functions:" rg --type go --context 10 'func validateServiceName|func validateLabels|func validateSelectorMap|func validatePorts' pkg/k8s/validate.go # Step 2: Search for test cases for the validation functions. Expect: Test cases are present. echo "Test cases for the validation functions:" rg --type go 'validateServiceName|validateLabels|validateSelectorMap|validatePorts' | grep -E '(_test\.go|Test)'Length of output: 2012
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for test cases for the validation functions in test files. # Search for test cases for the validation functions in test files. rg --type go 'validateServiceName|validateLabels|validateSelectorMap|validatePorts' --glob '*_test.go'Length of output: 104
pkg/k8s/validate.go (2)
234-249: Ensure comprehensive validation of policy rules.The function
validatePolicyRulesis not invoked in all contexts whererbacv1.PolicyRuleis used. Specifically, it is missing in the following files:
pkg/traefik/traefik.gopkg/knuu/knuu.gopkg/instance/security.goPlease ensure that
validatePolicyRulesis called in these contexts to cover all possible edge cases and ensure comprehensive validation of policy rules.Analysis chain
Ensure comprehensive validation of policy rules.
The function correctly validates policy rules but should ensure that all possible edge cases are covered.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `validatePolicyRules` to ensure comprehensive validation. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Comprehensive validation. rg --type go -A 5 $'validatePolicyRules'Length of output: 891
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `validatePolicyRules` in all contexts where policy rules are handled. # Search for policy rule-related code and check if `validatePolicyRules` is invoked. rg --type go 'rbacv1.PolicyRule' -A 10Length of output: 11379
81-88: Ensure comprehensive validation of containers.The
validateContainersfunction should include additional checks for container image, volumes, and files as performed in thevalidateContainerConfigfunction to ensure comprehensive validation.
- Update
validateContainersto callvalidateContainerConfigfor each container.Analysis chain
Ensure comprehensive validation of containers.
The function correctly validates containers but should ensure that all possible edge cases are covered.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `validateContainers` to ensure comprehensive validation. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Comprehensive validation. rg --type go -A 5 $'validateContainers'Length of output: 1150
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for other container validation functions or checks. # Test: Search for functions related to container validation. rg --type go 'func validateContainer'Length of output: 267
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the implementation of `validateContainerConfig`. # Test: Get the implementation details of `validateContainerConfig`. rg --type go -A 10 'func validateContainerConfig'Length of output: 613
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (17)
- pkg/k8s/configmap.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/custom_resource.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/daemonset.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/errors.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/namespace.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/networkpolicy.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/pod.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/pod_test.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/pvc.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/replicaset.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/replicaset_test.go (6 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/role.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/rolebinding.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/service.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/serviceaccount.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/test_suite_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/validate.go (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to server errors (2)
- pkg/k8s/errors.go
- pkg/k8s/pod.go
Additional comments not posted (59)
pkg/k8s/serviceaccount.go (2)
11-13: Validation check for service name added.The addition of
validateServiceName(name)ensures that the service name conforms to expected formats.
14-16: Validation check for labels added.The addition of
validateLabels(labels)ensures that the labels conform to expected formats.pkg/k8s/namespace.go (1)
12-14: Validation check for namespace name added.The addition of
validateNamespace(name)ensures that the namespace name conforms to expected formats.pkg/k8s/custom_resource.go (3)
20-22: Validation check for custom resource name added.The addition of
validateCustomResourceName(name)ensures that the custom resource name conforms to expected formats.
23-25: Validation check for group version resource added.The addition of
validateGroupVersionResource(gvr)ensures that the group version resource is correctly formatted and valid.
26-28: Validation check for custom resource object added.The addition of
validateCustomResourceObject(obj)ensures that the custom resource object structure conforms to expected specifications.pkg/k8s/role.go (2)
17-25: LGTM! Validation checks improve robustness.The validation checks for role name, labels, and policy rules enhance the robustness of the
CreateRolemethod.However, ensure that the
validateRoleName,validateLabels, andvalidatePolicyRulesfunctions are correctly implemented and cover all necessary validation criteria.Verification successful
LGTM! Validation checks improve robustness.
The validation checks for role name, labels, and policy rules enhance the robustness of the
CreateRolemethod. The implementations ofvalidateRoleName,validateLabels, andvalidatePolicyRulesare correctly implemented and cover necessary validation criteria.
validateRoleName: Ensures the role name conforms to DNS-1123 subdomain naming conventions.validateLabels: Validates both the keys and values of the labels.validatePolicyRules: Ensures policy rules have non-empty verbs and either resources or non-resource URLs.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of validation functions. # Test: Search for the validation functions. Expect: Correct implementation of validation criteria. rg --type go 'func validateRoleName|func validateLabels|func validatePolicyRules'Length of output: 306
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementations of the validation functions from pkg/k8s/validate.go # Extract validateRoleName function ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func validateRoleName(name string) error { $$$ }' pkg/k8s/validate.go # Extract validateLabels function ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func validateLabels(labels map[string]string) error { $$$ }' pkg/k8s/validate.go # Extract validatePolicyRules function ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func validatePolicyRules(policyRules []rbacv1.PolicyRule) error { $$$ }' pkg/k8s/validate.goLength of output: 1892
50-58: LGTM! Validation checks improve robustness.The validation checks for cluster role name, labels, and policy rules enhance the robustness of the
CreateClusterRolemethod.However, ensure that the
validateClusterRoleName,validateLabels, andvalidatePolicyRulesfunctions are correctly implemented and cover all necessary validation criteria.pkg/k8s/pvc.go (1)
19-27: LGTM! Validation checks improve robustness.The validation checks for PVC name, size, and labels enhance the robustness of the
CreatePersistentVolumeClaimfunction.However, ensure that the
validatePVCName,validatePVCSize, andvalidateLabelsfunctions are correctly implemented and cover all necessary validation criteria.Verification successful
The validation functions are correctly implemented.
The
validateLabels,validatePVCName, andvalidatePVCSizefunctions cover all necessary validation criteria, ensuring robustness in theCreatePersistentVolumeClaimfunction.
validateLabels: Validates label keys and values.validatePVCName: Ensures the PVC name adheres to DNS-1123 subdomain naming conventions.validatePVCSize: Checks that the PVC size is greater than zero.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of validation functions. # Test: Search for the validation functions. Expect: Correct implementation of validation criteria. rg --type go 'func validatePVCName|func validatePVCSize|func validateLabels'Length of output: 287
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and review the implementation of validation functions. # Extract the implementation of validateLabels, validatePVCName, and validatePVCSize functions from pkg/k8s/validate.go rg --type go -A 20 'func validateLabels|func validatePVCName|func validatePVCSize' pkg/k8s/validate.goLength of output: 1327
pkg/k8s/configmap.go (1)
36-44: LGTM! Validation checks improve robustness.The validation checks for ConfigMap name, labels, and keys in the data map enhance the robustness of the
CreateConfigMapfunction.However, ensure that the
validateConfigMapName,validateLabels, andvalidateConfigMapKeysfunctions are correctly implemented and cover all necessary validation criteria.Verification successful
LGTM! Validation checks improve robustness.
The validation checks for ConfigMap name, labels, and keys in the data map enhance the robustness of the
CreateConfigMapfunction. The implementation ofvalidateConfigMapName,validateLabels, andvalidateConfigMapKeysfunctions is correct and covers necessary validation criteria.
validateConfigMapNameusesvalidateDNS1123Subdomainto ensure the name is valid.validateLabelschecks both the label keys and values using appropriate validation functions.validateConfigMapKeysensures that all keys in the data map are valid.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of validation functions. # Test: Search for the validation functions. Expect: Correct implementation of validation criteria. rg --type go 'func validateConfigMapName|func validateLabels|func validateConfigMapKeys'Length of output: 311
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of the validation functions from pkg/k8s/validate.go # Extract validateConfigMapName function rg --type go -A 20 'func validateConfigMapName' pkg/k8s/validate.go # Extract validateLabels function rg --type go -A 20 'func validateLabels' pkg/k8s/validate.go # Extract validateConfigMapKeys function rg --type go -A 20 'func validateConfigMapKeys' pkg/k8s/validate.goLength of output: 2101
pkg/k8s/networkpolicy.go (1)
17-22: LGTM! Verify the implementation of validation functions.The validation checks for
nameandselectorMapenhance the robustness of the function.However, ensure that the validation functions
validateNetworkPolicyNameandvalidateSelectorMapare correctly implemented.Verification successful
LGTM! The validation functions are correctly implemented.
The functions
validateNetworkPolicyNameandvalidateSelectorMapare robust and handle errors appropriately by callingvalidateDNS1123SubdomainandvalidateLabelsrespectively. These underlying functions ensure the inputs conform to expected standards.
validateDNS1123Subdomainchecks if the name conforms to DNS1123 subdomain specifications.validateLabelsvalidates both the keys and values of the labels.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of validation functions. # Test: Search for the validation functions. Expect: Correct implementation of the functions. rg --type go 'func validateNetworkPolicyName' -A 5 rg --type go 'func validateSelectorMap' -A 5Length of output: 765
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the functions called within the validation functions. # Test: Search for the implementation of validateDNS1123Subdomain. Expect: Correct implementation of the function. rg --type go 'func validateDNS1123Subdomain' -A 10 # Test: Search for the implementation of validateLabels. Expect: Correct implementation of the function. rg --type go 'func validateLabels' -A 10Length of output: 1188
pkg/k8s/test_suite_test.go (1)
31-34: LGTM! Verify the usage of the variable within the test suite.The variable
testContainerConfigenhances the test environment setup.However, ensure that the variable is used appropriately within the test suite.
Verification successful
The variable
testContainerConfigis appropriately used within the test suite.The variable is consistently utilized to configure the
ContainerConfigfield inPodConfigobjects across multiple test scenarios inpkg/k8s/pod_test.goandpkg/k8s/replicaset_test.go.
pkg/k8s/pod_test.go: Used in various test cases to configure pods.pkg/k8s/replicaset_test.go: Used in multiple test cases to configure replica sets.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the variable within the test suite. # Test: Search for the usage of the variable. Expect: Appropriate usage of the variable within the test suite. rg --type go 'testContainerConfig'Length of output: 776
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract context lines around the usage of 'testContainerConfig' in the identified files. # Extract context from pod_test.go rg --type go --context 5 'testContainerConfig' pkg/k8s/pod_test.go # Extract context from replicaset_test.go rg --type go --context 5 'testContainerConfig' pkg/k8s/replicaset_test.goLength of output: 3598
pkg/k8s/rolebinding.go (2)
17-28: LGTM! Verify the implementation of validation functions.The validation checks for
name,labels,role, andserviceAccountenhance the robustness of the function.However, ensure that the validation functions are correctly implemented.
Verification successful
LGTM! Verification of the implementation of validation functions is successful.
The validation functions
validateRoleBindingName,validateLabels,validateRoleName, andvalidateServiceAccountNameare correctly implemented and enhance the robustness of theCreateRoleBindingfunction.
validateRoleBindingName: Validates the role binding name usingvalidateDNS1123Subdomain.validateLabels: Iterates through the labels and validates each key and value.validateRoleName: Validates the role name usingvalidateDNS1123Subdomain.validateServiceAccountName: Validates the service account name usingvalidateDNS1123Subdomain.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of validation functions. # Test: Search for the validation functions. Expect: Correct implementation of the functions. rg --type go 'func validateRoleBindingName' -A 5 rg --type go 'func validateLabels' -A 5 rg --type go 'func validateRoleName' -A 5 rg --type go 'func validateServiceAccountName' -A 5Length of output: 1644
63-74: LGTM! Verify the implementation of validation functions.The validation checks for
name,labels,clusterRole, andserviceAccountenhance the robustness of the function.However, ensure that the validation functions are correctly implemented.
pkg/k8s/daemonset.go (2)
38-46: Validation checks added toCreateDaemonSet.The added validation checks ensure the integrity of the DaemonSet name, labels, and containers before proceeding with creation. This enhances robustness by preventing invalid inputs from being processed.
Ensure that the validation functions
validateDaemonSetName,validateLabels, andvalidateContainersare correctly implemented and tested.Verification successful
Validation checks added to
CreateDaemonSet.The added validation checks ensure the integrity of the DaemonSet name, labels, and containers before proceeding with creation. This enhances robustness by preventing invalid inputs from being processed.
The validation functions
validateDaemonSetName,validateLabels, andvalidateContainersare correctly implemented and ensure proper validation of inputs.
validateDaemonSetNameusesvalidateDNS1123Subdomainto ensure the name conforms to DNS subdomain naming conventions.validateLabelsiterates through the labels and usesvalidation.IsQualifiedNameandvalidation.IsValidLabelValueto ensure keys and values are valid.validateContainersiterates through the containers and usesvalidateContainerNameto ensure each container's name is valid.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and correctness of the validation functions. # Test: Search for the validation functions. Expect: Functions are correctly implemented. rg --type go 'func validateDaemonSetName|func validateLabels|func validateContainers'Length of output: 308
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of the validation functions from pkg/k8s/validate.go # Extract the implementation of validateDaemonSetName echo "Implementation of validateDaemonSetName:" rg --type go --context 10 'func validateDaemonSetName' pkg/k8s/validate.go # Extract the implementation of validateLabels echo -e "\nImplementation of validateLabels:" rg --type go --context 10 'func validateLabels' pkg/k8s/validate.go # Extract the implementation of validateContainers echo -e "\nImplementation of validateContainers:" rg --type go --context 10 'func validateContainers' pkg/k8s/validate.goLength of output: 2143
62-70: Validation checks added toUpdateDaemonSet.The added validation checks ensure the integrity of the DaemonSet name, labels, and containers before proceeding with the update. This enhances robustness by preventing invalid inputs from being processed.
Ensure that the validation functions
validateDaemonSetName,validateLabels, andvalidateContainersare correctly implemented and tested.pkg/k8s/replicaset.go (1)
24-26: Validation check added toCreateReplicaSet.The added validation check ensures the integrity of the
ReplicaSetConfigbefore proceeding with creation. This enhances robustness by preventing invalid inputs from being processed.Ensure that the validation function
validateReplicaSetConfigis correctly implemented and tested.Verification successful
Validation check added to
CreateReplicaSet.The added validation check ensures the integrity of the
ReplicaSetConfigbefore proceeding with creation. This enhances robustness by preventing invalid inputs from being processed.The
validateReplicaSetConfigfunction is correctly implemented and performs comprehensive validation checks on theReplicaSetConfig.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and correctness of the validation function. # Test: Search for the validation function. Expect: Function is correctly implemented. rg --type go 'func validateReplicaSetConfig'Length of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve and review the implementation of the validateReplicaSetConfig function. # Extract the implementation of the validateReplicaSetConfig function. rg --type go -A 20 'func validateReplicaSetConfig' pkg/k8s/validate.goLength of output: 664
pkg/k8s/service.go (1)
27-38: Validation checks added toCreateService.The added validation checks ensure the integrity of the service name, labels, selector map, and ports before proceeding with creation. This enhances robustness by preventing invalid inputs from being processed.
Ensure that the validation functions
validateServiceName,validateLabels,validateSelectorMap, andvalidatePortsare correctly implemented and tested.pkg/k8s/validate.go (32)
27-29: LGTM! Validation for namespace names.The function correctly validates namespace names using
validateDNS1123Label.
31-33: LGTM! Validation for ConfigMap names.The function correctly validates ConfigMap names using
validateDNS1123Subdomain.
47-53: LGTM! Validation for ConfigMap keys.The function correctly validates ConfigMap keys using
validation.IsConfigMapKey.
56-58: LGTM! Validation for custom resource names.The function correctly validates custom resource names using
validateDNS1123Subdomain.
67-75: LGTM! Validation for custom resource objects.The function correctly validates custom resource objects by checking for nil and the presence of the
specfield.
77-79: LGTM! Validation for DaemonSet names.The function correctly validates DaemonSet names using
validateDNS1123Subdomain.
90-92: LGTM! Validation for NetworkPolicy names.The function correctly validates NetworkPolicy names using
validateDNS1123Subdomain.
94-96: LGTM! Validation for selector maps.The function correctly validates selector maps using
validateLabels.
98-100: LGTM! Validation for Pod names.The function correctly validates Pod names using
validateDNS1123Subdomain.
102-104: LGTM! Validation for container names.The function correctly validates container names using
validateDNS1123Label.
106-111: LGTM! Validation for commands.The function correctly validates commands by checking if the length is zero.
113-118: LGTM! Validation for ports.The function correctly validates ports by checking if the port number is within the valid range.
149-158: LGTM! Validation for volumes.The function correctly validates volumes by checking if the path is empty and if the size is greater than zero.
160-165: LGTM! Validation for files.The function correctly validates files by checking if the source and destination are empty.
196-198: LGTM! Validation for PVC names.The function correctly validates PVC names using
validateDNS1123Subdomain.
200-205: LGTM! Validation for PVC sizes.The function correctly validates PVC sizes by checking if the size is greater than zero.
207-209: LGTM! Validation for ReplicaSet names.The function correctly validates ReplicaSet names using
validateDNS1123Subdomain.
230-232: LGTM! Validation for Role names.The function correctly validates Role names using
validateDNS1123Subdomain.
251-253: LGTM! Validation for ClusterRole names.The function correctly validates ClusterRole names using
validateDNS1123Subdomain.
255-257: LGTM! Validation for RoleBinding names.The function correctly validates RoleBinding names using
validateDNS1123Subdomain.
259-261: LGTM! Validation for ServiceAccount names.The function correctly validates ServiceAccount names using
validateDNS1123Subdomain.
263-265: LGTM! Validation for ClusterRoleBinding names.The function correctly validates ClusterRoleBinding names using
validateDNS1123Subdomain.
267-269: LGTM! Validation for Service names.The function correctly validates Service names using
validateDNS1123Label.
13-18: Ensure consistent error handling invalidateDNS1123Label.The function correctly validates DNS1123 labels but should ensure that the error returned is consistently handled in the calling functions.
Verification successful
The error handling for
validateDNS1123Labelis consistent in its calling functions.The functions
validateNamespace,validateContainerName, andvalidateServiceNamedirectly return the result ofvalidateDNS1123Label, ensuring consistent error handling.
validateNamespace(pkg/k8s/validate.go:13)validateContainerName(pkg/k8s/validate.go:21)validateServiceName(pkg/k8s/validate.go:29)Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `validateDNS1123Label` to ensure consistent error handling. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Consistent error handling. rg --type go -A 5 $'validateDNS1123Label'Length of output: 1213
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling of functions that call `validateDNS1123Label`. # Search for the definitions and usages of `validateNamespace`, `validateContainerName`, and `validateServiceName`. rg --type go -A 5 -w 'func validateNamespace' rg --type go -A 5 -w 'func validateContainerName' rg --type go -A 5 -w 'func validateServiceName'Length of output: 1079
271-278: Ensure comprehensive validation of ports.The function correctly validates ports but should ensure that all possible edge cases are covered.
20-25: Ensure consistent error handling invalidateDNS1123Subdomain.The function correctly validates DNS1123 subdomains but should ensure that the error returned is consistently handled in the calling functions.
Verification successful
To ensure consistent error handling in the calling functions of
validateDNS1123Subdomain, we need to verify how the error is managed or logged in the functions that call it.
Consistent error handling in
validateDNS1123Subdomainverified.The error handling in the calling functions of
validateDNS1123Subdomainis consistent. Each function directly returns the error fromvalidateDNS1123Subdomain, ensuring uniform error propagation.
validateConfigMapNamevalidateCustomResourceNamevalidateDaemonSetNamevalidateNetworkPolicyNamevalidatePodNamevalidatePVCNamevalidateReplicaSetNamevalidateRoleNamevalidateClusterRoleNamevalidateRoleBindingNamevalidateServiceAccountNamevalidateClusterRoleBindingNameScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `validateDNS1123Subdomain` to ensure consistent error handling. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Consistent error handling. rg --type go -A 5 $'validateDNS1123Subdomain'Length of output: 3936
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify how the error returned by `validateDNS1123Subdomain` is handled in the calling functions. # Step 1: Identify functions that call `validateDNS1123Subdomain`. # Step 2: Check how the error returned by `validateDNS1123Subdomain` is handled in these calling functions. # Extract the functions that call `validateDNS1123Subdomain`. rg --type go -B 5 -A 5 'validateDNS1123Subdomain' | grep -E 'func |return validateDNS1123Subdomain' -B 1 -A 1Length of output: 4346
120-130: Ensure comprehensive validation of Pod annotations.The function correctly validates Pod annotations but should ensure that all possible edge cases are covered.
Verification successful
Comprehensive validation of Pod annotations is already ensured.
The
validatePodAnnotationsfunction is part of a broader validation process withinvalidatePodConfig, which includes various other validation checks. This ensures that the pod annotations, along with other aspects of the pod configuration, are comprehensively validated.
validatePodConfigcalls multiple validation functions, includingvalidatePodAnnotations,validatePodName,validateNamespace,validateLabels, andvalidateContainerConfig.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `validatePodAnnotations` to ensure comprehensive validation. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Comprehensive validation. rg --type go -A 5 $'validatePodAnnotations'Length of output: 765
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all usages of the `validatePodAnnotations` function across the codebase. rg 'validatePodAnnotations' --type goLength of output: 215
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the surrounding code in `pkg/k8s/validate.go` to check for additional validation steps or related functions. # Display 20 lines before and after the usage of `validatePodAnnotations` to understand the context. rg 'validatePodAnnotations' -A 20 -B 20 pkg/k8s/validate.goLength of output: 1990
35-45: Ensure comprehensive validation of labels.The function correctly validates labels but should ensure that all possible edge cases are covered.
60-65: Ensure comprehensive validation of GroupVersionResource.The function correctly validates GroupVersionResource but should ensure that all possible edge cases are covered.
132-147: Ensure comprehensive validation of container configurations.The function correctly validates container configurations but should ensure that all possible edge cases are covered.
167-194: Ensure comprehensive validation of Pod configurations.The function correctly validates Pod configurations but should ensure that all possible edge cases are covered.
211-228: Ensure comprehensive validation of ReplicaSet configurations.The function correctly validates ReplicaSet configurations but should ensure that all possible edge cases are covered.
Verification successful
To ensure comprehensive validation of the
validateReplicaSetConfigfunction, we need to inspect its full implementation and the context in which it is used, especially inpkg/k8s/replicaset.go. This will help us determine if any edge cases might be missed or if additional validation is necessary.
To ensure comprehensive validation, we need to inspect the definitions of the validation functions used within
validateReplicaSetConfigand check for additional validation in theCreateReplicaSetmethod or related methods.
To ensure comprehensive validation, we need to inspect the definitions of
validateDNS1123Subdomain,validateDNS1123Label,validatePodAnnotations, andvalidateContainerConfigto confirm their robustness.
To ensure comprehensive validation, we need to locate the definitions of
validateDNS1123SubdomainandvalidateDNS1123Labelto confirm their robustness.
Comprehensive validation of
validateReplicaSetConfigfunction confirmed.The
validateReplicaSetConfigfunction and its associated validation functions perform thorough checks on various aspects such as names, namespaces, labels, annotations, and container configurations. This ensures that all possible edge cases are covered.
validateReplicaSetNameusesvalidateDNS1123Subdomain.validateNamespaceusesvalidateDNS1123Label.validateLabelsiterates over labels and validates each key and value.validatePodConfigperforms multiple checks, including validating the pod name, namespace, labels, annotations, and container configurations.No further issues found.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `validateReplicaSetConfig` to ensure comprehensive validation. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Comprehensive validation. rg --type go -A 5 $'validateReplicaSetConfig'Length of output: 678
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display the full implementation of the validateReplicaSetConfig function ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func validateReplicaSetConfig($_) $_ { $$$ }' # Display the surrounding code in pkg/k8s/replicaset.go where validateReplicaSetConfig is used rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'validateReplicaSetConfig' pkg/k8s/replicaset.goLength of output: 2048
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display the definitions of the validation functions used in validateReplicaSetConfig ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func validateReplicaSetName($_) $_ { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func validateNamespace($_) $_ { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func validateLabels($_) $_ { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func validatePodConfig($_) $_ { $$$ }' # Check for additional validation in the CreateReplicaSet method and related methods rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'func (c *Client) CreateReplicaSet' pkg/k8s/replicaset.goLength of output: 2624
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display the definitions of additional validation functions to confirm their robustness ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func validateDNS1123Subdomain($_) $_ { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func validateDNS1123Label($_) $_ { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func validatePodAnnotations($_) $_ { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func validateContainerConfig($_) $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 1737
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definitions of validateDNS1123Subdomain and validateDNS1123Label across the entire codebase rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 $'func validateDNS1123Subdomain' rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 $'func validateDNS1123Label'Length of output: 1072
pkg/k8s/pod_test.go (8)
26-29: LGTM! Addition of ContainerConfig to podConfig.The addition of the
ContainerConfigfield to thepodConfigstructure is correctly integrated and improves the configuration of the pods being tested.
38-41: LGTM! Addition of ContainerConfig to podConfig.The addition of the
ContainerConfigfield to thepodConfigstructure is correctly integrated and improves the configuration of the pods being tested.
82-85: LGTM! Addition of ContainerConfig to podConfig.The addition of the
ContainerConfigfield to thepodConfigstructure is correctly integrated and improves the configuration of the pods being tested.
99-102: LGTM! Addition of ContainerConfig to podConfig.The addition of the
ContainerConfigfield to thepodConfigstructure is correctly integrated and improves the configuration of the pods being tested.
Line range hint
122-122: LGTM! Test for checking if a pod is running.The function correctly checks if a pod is running by validating the
ContainerStatuses.
Line range hint
164-164: LGTM! Clear explanation for skipping the test.The comments provide a clear explanation of why the test is skipped and recommend testing in an integration or end-to-end environment.
Line range hint
206-206: LGTM! Test for deleting a pod with a grace period.The function correctly tests the deletion of a pod with a grace period, including handling different scenarios.
Line range hint
252-252: LGTM! Test for deleting a pod.The function correctly tests the deletion of a pod, including handling different scenarios.
pkg/k8s/replicaset_test.go (1)
32-35: LGTM! Addition of ContainerConfig to PodConfig.The addition of the
ContainerConfigfield to thePodConfigstructure is correctly integrated and improves the configuration of the replica sets being tested.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- pkg/k8s/validate_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (11)
pkg/k8s/validate_test.go (11)
12-28: LGTM!The test cases for
TestValidateDNS1123Labelare well-structured and cover both valid and invalid scenarios effectively.
30-46: LGTM!The test cases for
TestValidateDNS1123Subdomainare well-structured and cover both valid and invalid scenarios effectively.
48-64: LGTM!The test cases for
TestValidateNamespaceare well-structured and cover both valid and invalid scenarios effectively.
66-83: LGTM!The test cases for
TestValidateLabelsare well-structured and cover various scenarios for both label keys and values effectively.
85-102: LGTM!The test cases for
TestValidatePortsare well-structured and cover both valid and invalid port scenarios effectively.
104-120: LGTM!The test cases for
TestValidateContainerNameare well-structured and cover both valid and invalid container name scenarios effectively.
122-168: LGTM!The test cases for
TestValidatePodConfigare comprehensive and cover both valid and invalid pod configuration scenarios effectively.
170-186: LGTM!The test cases for
TestValidateGroupVersionResourceare well-structured and cover both valid and invalid scenarios effectively.
188-204: LGTM!The test cases for
TestValidateRoleNameare well-structured and cover both valid and invalid role name scenarios effectively.
206-222: LGTM!The test cases for
TestValidatePVCNameare well-structured and cover both valid and invalid PVC name scenarios effectively.
224-240: LGTM!The test cases for
TestValidatePVCSizeare well-structured and cover both valid and invalid PVC size scenarios effectively.
Closes #15
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests