Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

doc: incorporating the description of partial absence proof in the NMT specs #205

Closed
staheri14 opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #209
Closed

doc: incorporating the description of partial absence proof in the NMT specs #205

staheri14 opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #209
Assignees
@staheri14

Comments

@staheri14
Copy link
Collaborator

Based on the outcome of #118, we can consider incorporating the description of partial absence proof into the NMT specifications. This issue primarily aims to reach a consensus on this decision. If it is determined that including the partial absence proof description is valuable, it should be added to the specifications accordingly.
@staheri14 staheri14 self-assigned this Jun 7, 2023
@staheri14 staheri14 mentioned this issue Jun 7, 2023
Closed
@staheri14 staheri14 changed the title chore: incorporating the description of partial absence proof in the NMT specs doc: incorporating the description of partial absence proof in the NMT specs Jun 23, 2023
@staheri14 staheri14 mentioned this issue Jun 23, 2023
Merged
5 tasks
staheri14 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2023
@staheri14
doc: introduces short namespace absence proof in the NMT specs (#209)
9f0f36e 
## Overview

Closes #205 
Additionally, in line with
[this](#206), to ensure
consistency with how **namespace ID** and **namespace** (i.e., a
combination of namespace ID and version) are utilized in the core-app, I
have replaced all instances of words that refer to or imply **namespace
ID** with the more accurate term "**namespace**".

## Checklist

- [x] New and updated code has appropriate documentation
- [x] New and updated code has new and/or updated testing
- [x] Required CI checks are passing
- [x] Visual proof for any user facing features like CLI or
documentation updates
- [x] Linked issues closed with keywords
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@staheri14 staheri14

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

doc: introduces short namespace absence proof in the NMT specs celestiaorg/nmt
1 participant
@staheri14