Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(wmg): Filter Analytics #5106

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

ashin-czi
Copy link
Contributor

Reason for Change

Changes

  • add
  • remove
  • modify

Testing steps

  • Either list QA steps or reasoning you feel QA is unnecessary
  • Describe how you made sure to know that your changes worked. Should allow someone else to go verify your code without in depth knowledge.
  • "Unit tested only", "tested in rdev by a, b, c, verifying feature worked by... ", "manually ran pipeline locally with these results: ..."

Notes for Reviewer

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 27, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #5106 (fc0c009) into main (e21ca46) will increase coverage by 0.10%.
The diff coverage is 89.57%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5106      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.73%   86.84%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         186      189       +3     
  Lines       13965    14280     +315     
==========================================
+ Hits        12113    12401     +288     
- Misses       1852     1879      +27     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 86.84% <89.57%> (+0.10%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
backend/layers/processing/process.py 52.52% <0.00%> (ø)
...ackend/wmg/data/schemas/marker_gene_cube_schema.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
backend/wmg/pipeline/integrated_corpus/job.py 29.03% <0.00%> (-2.01%) ⬇️
...nd/wmg/pipeline/summary_cubes/calculate_markers.py 91.34% <ø> (-0.08%) ⬇️
backend/wmg/pipeline/summary_cubes/marker_genes.py 30.35% <0.00%> (+1.54%) ⬆️
...s/unit/backend/wmg/test_marker_gene_calculation.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
backend/layers/thirdparty/s3_provider.py 58.00% <40.00%> (-2.87%) ⬇️
backend/wmg/data/query.py 99.03% <50.00%> (-0.97%) ⬇️
backend/layers/business/business_interface.py 53.33% <66.66%> (-0.38%) ⬇️
backend/layers/thirdparty/s3_provider_interface.py 75.00% <66.66%> (-3.58%) ⬇️
... and 22 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@ashin-czi ashin-czi marked this pull request as draft June 28, 2023 15:49
@tihuan
Copy link
Contributor

tihuan commented Jun 28, 2023

@ashin-czi is this ready for review or still a draft 😄 ? Thank you!

@ashin-czi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ashin-czi is this ready for review or still a draft 😄 ? Thank you!

Still working on this! Got sidetracked for some cell cards stuff but back to it now, might need to pick your brain for this ticket at some point though!

@@ -156,6 +154,8 @@ export const loadStateFromQueryParams = (
})
);

removeParams(paramsToRemove);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removing params at the end of function

[key: string]: string[];
}>({});

const filterIsSelected = useMemo(() => {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

boolean if any filter is selected

return false;
}, [currentOptions]);

const [filterBeforeAfterEventSent, setFilterBeforeAfterEventSent] =
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

used to make sure before and after events aren't being sent together

@maniarathi
Copy link
Contributor

@ashin-czi just wanted to check the status on this PR given that it hasn't seen any movement for a few weeks. Thanks!

@tihuan
Copy link
Contributor

tihuan commented Sep 20, 2023

#4534 (comment) closing for now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants