Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve SyncReadMem.read, .readWrite (backport #3221) #3233

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 2, 2023

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented May 2, 2023

This is an automatic backport of pull request #3221 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com


Original PR Body

Fixes some additional nits and improves code quality in various places which was prompted by #3213, but weren't addressed due to auto-merge. This PR is meant to be an additional part of that PR.

Contributor Checklist

  • Did you add Scaladoc to every public function/method?
  • Did you add at least one test demonstrating the PR?
  • Did you delete any extraneous printlns/debugging code?
  • Did you specify the type of improvement?
  • Did you add appropriate documentation in docs/src?
  • Did you request a desired merge strategy?
  • Did you add text to be included in the Release Notes for this change?

Type of Improvement

Desired Merge Strategy

Release Notes

Reviewer Checklist (only modified by reviewer)

  • Did you add the appropriate labels? (Select the most appropriate one based on the "Type of Improvement")
  • Did you mark the proper milestone (Bug fix: 3.5.x or 3.6.x depending on impact, API modification or big change: 5.0.0)?
  • Did you review?
  • Did you check whether all relevant Contributor checkboxes have been checked?
  • Did you do one of the following when ready to merge:
    • Squash: You/ the contributor Enable auto-merge (squash), clean up the commit message, and label with Please Merge.
    • Merge: Ensure that contributor has cleaned up their commit history, then merge with Create a merge commit.

* Mark generated wires for read and readWrite as temporary
* Remove semicolons
* Remove intermediate wire for read/readWrite port address
* Convert usages of UnlocatableSourceInfo into macro applications

(cherry picked from commit e078c0f)
@mergify mergify bot added the Backport Automated backport, please consider for minor release label May 2, 2023
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 8d0935f into 5.x May 2, 2023
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/5.x/pr-3221 branch May 2, 2023 22:36
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Internal Internal change, does not affect users, will be included in release notes label May 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Backport Automated backport, please consider for minor release Internal Internal change, does not affect users, will be included in release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant