Remove redundant locks and transactions #2967
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- When locking an instance, there is no need to explicitly lock its corresponding operation (dependent 1:1 association). - As 'save_with_new_operation' (ServiceInstance) now locks the instance and updates itself and the associated operation in a transaction (see [1]), there is no need to wrap it into another transaction in the calling code. [1] cloudfoundry#2916
svkrieger
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
save_with_new_operation(ServiceInstance) now locks the instance and updates itself and the associated operation in a transaction (see [1]), there is no need to wrap it into another transaction in the calling code.[1] #2916
I have reviewed the contributing guide
I have viewed, signed, and submitted the Contributor License Agreement
I have made this pull request to the
mainbranchI have run all the unit tests using
bundle exec rakeI have run CF Acceptance Tests