-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add model checksums #5
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for branch main. @smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela, @jfernan2, @iarspider, @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
cms-bot internal usage |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25b676/36866/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 please sign so we can move to the next step of the plan in cms-sw/cmssw#43695 |
@kpedro88 , why not run tests with cms-sw/cmssw#43696 to make sure |
@smuzaffar I've run such tests privately. I was hoping to avoid having to list the N-1 related PRs in every PR in this group to run such tests centrally. The changes in the cms-data PRs are harmless taken alone, so it should be fine to just integrate them first. |
+externals |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next main IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
for cms-sw/cmssw#43695