11634.911 from a short matrix is added to the reco comparison workflow map file

[slava77]

this should resolve the missing map entry warnings appearing since Feb 11 after cms-sw/cmssw#32857 was merged

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @slava77 (Slava Krutelyov) for branch master.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
cms-bot commands are listed here

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-197a84/12927/summary.html
COMMIT: b1400db
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-02-16-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cms-bot/1490/12927/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 37
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2750846
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 9
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2750815
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 36 files compared)
• Checked 156 log files, 37 edm output root files, 37 DQM output files

[slava77]

the update worked as expected:

• the warning about a missing map is gone
• the new workflow reco comparison directory is available with sensible content (a log file of a comparison jobe) https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/baseLineComparisons/CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-02-16-1100+197a84/41255/validateJR/all_OldVSNew_TTbar14TeV2021DD4wf11634p911/

I think that this PR is ready to be merged.

[smuzaffar]

+externals

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)