-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move llvm to 8.0.1 as llvm-lite was updated to 0.29 #5146
Move llvm to 8.0.1 as llvm-lite was updated to 0.29 #5146
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for branch IB/CMSSW_11_0_X/gcc700. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @gudrutis, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
|
please test with cms-sw/cmssw#27663 for CMSSW_11_0_CLANG_X |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: 6693a07 You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: UnitTests
I found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test_MpsWorkFlow had ERRORS |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
the differences are in log errors for one workflow
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/baseLineComparisons/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-08-26-1100+b8a5cb/33241/validateJR/all_OldVSNew_TTbar13TeVPU2017wf10224p0/
14 fileAction -s MixingModule:mix 3 3
15 fileAction -s MixingModule:mix 2 2
16 fileAction -s MixingModule:mix 1 1
vs
14 fileAction -s MixingModule:mix 2 2
15 fileAction -s MixingModule:mix 1 1
(which I don't see in the log itself...)
do we understand this btw
26-Aug-2019 13:01:22 CEST Successfully opened file root://eoscms.cern.ch//eos/cms/store/user/cmsbuild/store/relval/CMSSW_10_6_0/RelValMinBias_13/GEN-SIM/106X_mc2017_realistic_v3-v1/10000/5F6D4D28-A5D2-6A48-B327-5C827D7F53FB.root
[13:01:28] /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/build-any-ib/w/BUILD/slc7_amd64_gcc700/external/mxnet-predict/1.5.0/mxnet-predict-1.5.0/src/nnvm/legacy_json_util.cc:209: Loading symbol saved by previous version v1.2.1. Attempting to upgrade...
[13:01:28] /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/build-any-ib/w/BUILD/slc7_amd64_gcc700/external/mxnet-predict/1.5.0/mxnet-predict-1.5.0/src/nnvm/legacy_json_util.cc:217: Symbol successfully upgraded!
[13:01:29] /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/build-any-ib/w/BUILD/slc7_amd64_gcc700/external/mxnet-predict/1.5.0/mxnet-predict-1.5.0/src/nnvm/legacy_json_util.cc:209: Loading symbol saved by previous version v1.2.1. Attempting to upgrade...
[13:01:29] /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/build-any-ib/w/BUILD/slc7_amd64_gcc700/external/mxnet-predict/1.5.0/mxnet-predict-1.5.0/src/nnvm/legacy_json_util.cc:217: Symbol successfully upgraded!
… On Aug 27, 2019, at 9:11 AM, Malik Shahzad Muzaffar ***@***.***> wrote:
+externals
@slava77 , can you please check the reco comparison results here? Do they look real to you?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
@davidlange6, looks like this is due to file /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/nweek-02591/slc7_amd64_gcc700/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-08-26-2300/external/slc7_amd64_gcc700/data/RecoBTag/Combined/data/DeepBoostedJet/V02/full/resnet-symbol.json which was created with |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: |
Comparison job queued. |
can we get rid of the warnings somehow?
… On Aug 27, 2019, at 11:20 AM, Malik Shahzad Muzaffar ***@***.***> wrote:
@davidlange6, looks like this is due to file /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/nweek-02591/slc7_amd64_gcc700/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-08-26-2300/external/slc7_amd64_gcc700/data/RecoBTag/Combined/data/DeepBoostedJet/V02/full/resnet-symbol.json which was created with "mxnet_version": ["int", 10201] and now we have mxnet verison 1.5.0.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
FYI @fabiocos , @davidlange6 , @kpedro88 and @Dr15Jones
I would suggest to go ahead with llvm 8.0.1 integration in master branch. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_11_0_X/gcc700 IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
backport of #5114