CMSSW_7_5_X DQM updates for AlphaT HLT paths (v2)

[MarkBaber]

Addition of DQM monitoring to new AlphaT path, supersedes #10704

Addition of DQM monitoring for the following HLT paths:

• HLT_PFHT200_PFAlphaT0p51_v
• HLT_PFHT200_DiPFJetAve90_PFAlphaT0p57_v
• HLT_PFHT250_DiPFJetAve90_PFAlphaT0p55_v
• HLT_PFHT300_DiPFJetAve90_PFAlphaT0p53_v
• HLT_PFHT350_DiPFJetAve90_PFAlphaT0p52_v
• HLT_PFHT400_DiPFJetAve90_PFAlphaT0p51_v

Remove number of monitoring histograms

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @MarkBaber (Mark Baber) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

CMSSW_7_5_X DQM updates for AlphaT HLT paths (v2)

It involves the following packages:

HLTriggerOffline/SUSYBSM

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[danduggan]

please test
@MarkBaber, yes please do close your other PRs and we'll continue with these.

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: c8442ea
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10878/7502/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
b3ec541
f04d61a
cbc9e62
3ec05f1
a5342f3
d1cc514
6ce1f61
90dc231
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10878/7502/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10878/7502/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10878/7502/summary.html

[danduggan]

+1
@MarkBaber, the difference in bins is much more manageable now. for the direct commenting out of code, it's not too pretty and I'd avoid it, but I'll let @davidlange6 comment on integrating as is.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[MarkBaber]

#10877 has been merged, can we also merge this?

[davidlange6]

+1