HLtriggerOffline/Higgs path update (75X)

[jasperlauwers]

Backport of #11206

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @jasperlauwers for CMSSW_7_5_X.

HLtriggerOffline/Higgs path update (75X)

It involves the following packages:

HLTriggerOffline/Higgs

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[deguio]

please test

[deguio]

+1
provided it passes the tests

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 33699c1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11208/8060/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11208/8060/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[jasperlauwers]

This has been merged in 76X 8 days ago and now is holding up other pull requests. Is there a reason why it didn't get merged yet?

[davidlange6]

as commented in this thread, validation in 76x is needed (which can happen once 760pre6 is built and run throw relval cycle)

On Sep 23, 2015, at 3:50 PM, jasperlauwers [email protected] wrote:

This has been merged in 76X 8 days ago and now is holding up other pull requests. Is there a reason why it didn't get merged yet?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[jasperlauwers]

Thanks for the explanation. The reason I am asking is because I was asked in #11342 to make a separate PR for adding a new path.
Do I understand correctly that the procedure to follow is to make a PR for that one commit separately and then rebase this one? And that the reason that #11342 doesn't need validation in 76x is because is doesn't make any changes to the code itself (although in this PR it are only two lines) ?