Backport of PR #11213 (making space for storing "method 3" energy in HBHERecHit)

[igv4321]

Backport of PR #11213 to 7_5_X

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @igv4321 (Igor Volobouev) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Backport of PR #11213

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/HcalRecHit
RecoLocalCalo/HcalRecAlgos

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[slava77]

@igv4321 please use a more verbose subject for the PR (e.g. "Preparing to include Method 3 result into HBHERecHit (backport of #11213)"

[cvuosalo]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 9cae790
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11214/7987/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11214/7987/summary.html

[slava77]

#11214 (comment)
""
@igv4321 please use a more verbose subject for the PR (e.g. "Preparing to include Method 3 result into HBHERecHit (backport of #11213)"
""
Thank you.

[slava77]

+1

for #11214 9cae790

• the same changes were applied here as in 76X PR
• new code is not used anywhere yet; the change in the HCAL hit data format should be transparent in 75X with respect to other already generated samples (addition of a member)
• jenkins tests pass and comparisons with baseline show no differences, as expected

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[abdoulline]

May we get it merged for Igor to proceed with making Method 3 permanently running (as Method 0 does) ?

[davidlange6]

@igv4321 @abdoulline - please add a description in the PR name for the release notes. Thanks

[igv4321]

Done

[davidlange6]

Hi - I'm cleaning up the 75x CMSSW release queue, so closing issues not directly related to analysis or finalizing the HI MC production. Please make sure these requests are included in the 80x release already. Thanks!