New analysis module StripClusterMCanalysis

[wmtford]

EDAnalyzer in the test directories of /Validation/TrackerRecHits. Produces a flat ntuple with si strip cluster information including that from matched MC truth. A root macro generates useful plots.
Documentation in https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/SWGuideStripClusterMCtruth#StripClusterMCanalysis_Ntuple_ma

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @wmtford (Bill Ford) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

New analysis module StripClusterMCanalysis

It involves the following packages:

Validation/TrackerRecHits

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @vanbesien, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @VinInn this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[deguio]

please test

[deguio]

this PR adds an entuplizer which is never run in production workflows but it is included for convenience in cmssw.
@davidlange6 is this acceptable?
F.

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: b5c7916
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11499/8427/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11499/8427/summary.html

[deguio]

+1
doesn't hurt in my opinion

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1