Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix for LS range in case LS is there but no event processed #11557

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2015
Merged

fix for LS range in case LS is there but no event processed #11557

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2015

Conversation

sushilchauhan
Copy link
Contributor

same changes as in PR 11543(for 74X). LS stamp range for fit is fixed in case no event are processed in a LS.

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_7_6_X milestone Sep 29, 2015
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @sushilchauhan for CMSSW_7_6_X.

fix for LS range in case LS is there but no event processed

It involves the following packages:

DQM/BeamMonitor

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @vanbesien, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Sep 29, 2015

please test

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Sep 29, 2015

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 8d04de2
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11557/8489/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11557/8489/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2015
@cmsbuild
Merge pull request #11557 from sushilchauhan/beammonitor_LSfix_760pre5
83bb33e 
fix for LS range in case LS is there but no event processed
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 83bb33e into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_6_X Sep 30, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
comparison-available dqm-approved fully-signed tests-approved
Projects
None yet
Milestone
CMSSW_7_6_X
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@sushilchauhan @cmsbuild @deguio @davidlange6