Do not use private 'XrdCl::FileSystem::FileSystem(const XrdCl::FileSystem&)

[davidlt]

The following showed up after a switch to xrootd 4.2.3 happened in
CMSSW_7_6_DEVEL_X IBs. The ctor 'XrdCl::FileSystem::FileSystem(const
XrdCl::FileSystem&)' is private and should not be used.

Signed-off-by: David Abdurachmanov [email protected]

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @davidlt for CMSSW_7_6_X.

Do not use private 'XrdCl::FileSystem::FileSystem(const XrdCl::FileSystem&)

It involves the following packages:

Utilities/XrdAdaptor

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @wddgit this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[Dr15Jones]

@bbockelm

[bbockelm]

Oh duh, good catch.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 0805d6c
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11606/8557/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
3cca4f7
edd325e
423d214
66508ba
ebde143
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11606/8557/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11606/8557/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11606/8557/summary.html

[davidlt]

Could we get this in to revive DEVEL_X IBs?

[smuzaffar]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar