fix memory leaks in EcalClusterLazyTools

[jolange]

see #13497

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @jolange (Johannes Lange) for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoEcal/EgammaCoreTools

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @davidlange6, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Sam-Harper, @argiro, @lgray this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/11585/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: b458e2a
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13504/11585/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13504/11585/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #13504 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @davidlange6, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

[cvuosalo]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/11673/console

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #13504 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @davidlange6, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

[cvuosalo]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/11766/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 7ea1052
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13504/11766/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13504/11766/summary.html

[cvuosalo]

+1

For #13504 7ea1052

Fixing a memory leak in EcalClusterLazyToolsBase. There should be no change in monitored quantities. #13497 and #13505 are the 76X and 81X versions of this PR, and the former has already been approved.

The code fix is satisfactory, and Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_8_0_X_2016-03-06-1100 show no significant differences, as expected.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1