-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Upgrade Phase-2 Pixel 3D Digitizer] Fix misevaluation of charge when migrating due to diffusion #33300
Conversation
The rectangle formed by the entry and exit points of the PSimHit has been extended in order to consider all the pixels illuminated due to diffusion (charge sharing)
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33300/21824
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33300/21829
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33300/21830
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d62f29/14232/summary.html CMS Clang-Tidy warnings: There are Clang-Tidy warnings. See https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d62f29/14232/llvm-analysis/cmsclangtidy.txt for details. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
@claralasa The short matrix does not include geometry with 3D pixel. Is T25 (D80) or T26 (D81) OK for the test? I will retrigger the test again. By the way, as warning shown in FYI @mmusich |
Yes, these are OK, but T23 (D79, wf: 35834.0) is even better (it has 3D also in the endcaps).
Well, for the |
Please test workflow 35834.0 |
OK, thanks. Then I will ignore the warning for now, and will follow up with the core team. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d62f29/14299/summary.html CMS Clang-Tidy warnings: There are Clang-Tidy warnings. See https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d62f29/14299/llvm-analysis/cmsclangtidy.txt for details. Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Before this fix, more than half of the carriers were migrated due to diffusion. This made the residuals to change their sign in the region enabled for charge migration. In addition, a factor in the evaluation of migrated charge was missing.
Nevertheless, these fixes are barely noticeable due to the small allowed charge migration region (0.4 um) and so no changes in the plots are expected. In order to visualize the effect, such a region has been tested increasing up to 5 um. Just used for this study, the value in the code stays as 0.4 um. In the plot below, the charge per digi is shown. As can be observed, it does not change after the fix with the baseline of 0.4um.
There are also some changes in the provisional validator used to cross-check the digitizer (which is not included within the validation framework).
This PR only concerns Upgrade (@duartej , @emiglior , @skinnari )
PR validation:
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
No.