-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use std:: functions instead of TMath:: functions in RecoEgamma #34325
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34325/23674
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
Any idea why the code checks didn't get triggered again? |
code-checks no idea, may be you pushed a commit with timestamp in past? |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34325/23679
|
A new Pull Request was created by @guitargeek (Jonas Rembser) for master. It involves the following packages: RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronAlgos @perrotta, @jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-799f36/16452/summary.html CMS StaticAnalyzer warnings: There are 6 EventSetupRecord::get warnings. See https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-799f36/16452/llvm-analysis/esrget-sa.txt for details. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
maybe also |
@guitargeek |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34325/23697
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34325/23702
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-799f36/16487/summary.html CMS StaticAnalyzer warnings: There are 6 EventSetupRecord::get warnings. See https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-799f36/16487/llvm-analysis/esrget-sa.txt for details. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
I think the standard library math functions should be used unless there is a specific reason to use something else.
RecoEgamma already uses the standard library functions for the most part, this PR is replacing the remaining TMath functions.
PR validation:
CMSSW compiles.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
No backport indended.