-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mkFit updates aiming to improve pixelLess iteration and related #39055
Conversation
1. Loop over all available hits, until max-cand output slots are filled. 2. Make sure Kalman update is done on the main selected hit (not overlap). 3. Do not bump candidate chi2 when adding overlap hits.
…o the Kalman update plane in the barrel (can be controlled by KFO_Local_Cov)
type tracking |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39055/31557
|
A new Pull Request was created by @slava77 (Slava Krutelyov) for master. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-edbc39/26807/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cms-sw/tracking-pog-l2 were there any outstanding questions you would like to be addressed from the meeting yesterday? (I did not have that impression, but just to check) |
I don't think there was any specific objection to let this PR be integrated, provided it wasn't reactivating mkFit on the pixelLess iteration by default (that would require more work). Having said that, I haven't yet looked at the code changes if that's a review that is requested. |
Thanks. It was more of a generic question than a request for review (which is of course always welcome). |
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1
|
Motivated by observed inefficiency in the pixelLess iteration track building for low-pt displaced tracks, several features/bugs were fixed and improvements to the algorithm were added:
MTV plots, including timing, are available for ttbar relval with pileup [for the standard DQM selections](https://slava77.web.cern.ch/slava77/mic/CMSSW_12_5_0_pre4-pixmkf /RelValTTbar_14TeV/mtv-mkf5-mkf6-orig-Aug15POG-tr102-08be050) (signal tracks have pt>0.9 GeV in the efficiency plots) and separately [for signal simtracks selected with pt<0.9 GeV](https://slava77.web.cern.ch/slava77/mic/CMSSW_12_5_0_pre4-pixmkf/RelValTTbar_14TeV/mtv-mkf5-mkf6-orig-Aug15POG-tr102-08be050-lopt for low-pt)
Expectations:
Incremental comparisons are available in trackreco#102
Presentation in the Aug 15 TRK POG meeting https://indico.cern.ch/event/1189133/#3-mkfit-updates
Please consider for 12_5_0_pre5