-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add states to GsfMultiStateUpdator
MultiState only if the localError matrix is valid
#39056
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39056/31558
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9077aa/26810/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
GsfMultiStateUpdator
MultiState only if the localError matrix is validGsfMultiStateUpdator
MultiState only if the localError matrix is valid
Thanks @mmusich! @wrtabb @SohamBhattacharya @cms-sw/egamma-pog-l2 do you think this could change physics in rare cases, or does it only fix a job that would otherwise crash? |
type tracking, egamma, bug-fix |
Running the RECO step on 1k Z'->EE MC events, with and w/o this fix, I do not see any difference in electron pT distribution. So, to me it seems that overall there will be no change in physics, but we will get rid of the rare crashes that are happening now in Gsf tracking step. |
Also tagging incoming EGM-RECO convenor Prasant Kumar Rout @Prasant1993 |
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
resolves #39026
PR description:
Title says it all, in order to avoid multi-states during electron tracking that lead to exceptions in
BasicMultiTrajectoryState
when mixing states with valid and invalid local errors.PR validation:
Run successfully the configuration posted at #39026 (comment).
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport, but if accepted, it needs to be backported to 12_4_X for data-taking