Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CORE] [DEVEL] Fix warnings on deprecated copy-constructors #43406

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2023

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@smuzaffar smuzaffar commented Nov 27, 2023

Fixes deprecated warnings for DEVEL IBs.
Updated test_precomputed_value_sort to actually compare the results and fail in case of unexpected results.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test for CMSSW_14_0_DEVEL_X

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43406/37908

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Utilities/General (core)

@makortel, @Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@wddgit this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

Since this is not actually a test (if there is a problem the program still returns 0) I thinks we should either

  1. remove the test all together or
  2. make the test actually check the results of the sorting.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4f92a2/36093/summary.html
COMMIT: a2d387c
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_DEVEL_X_2023-11-26-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/43406/36093/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

remove the test all together or

I am in favor of dropping it, any objections @makortel ?

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

I agree dropping the test would not make the situation worse, but in principle it would be nice to have a test for it. So I'm a little bit, but not too much, against dropping the test.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok, I have updated the unit tests to compare the results

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43406/37953

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #43406 was updated. @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @smuzaffar can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4f92a2/36147/summary.html
COMMIT: 2895576
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2023-11-28-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/43406/36147/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 61 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3367918
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3367889
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
  • Checked 214 log files, 167 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

+core

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants