-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Phase2-hgx350 Make modifications for the HGCal version V18 in the case of mouse bite, guard rings, ... #43449
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43449/37998
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43449/37999 |
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @makortel, @srimanob, @bsunanda, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild Please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6dc338/36209/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
@cmsbuild please test Just to re-trigger the test, to see if we can get clean result on unrelated workflows. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6dc338/36234/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
Not relate to this PR, but please consider to issue reported by static check.
|
@srimanob , Thanks for pointing to the problem. Here const_cast is thread safe. Geant4 design expect that SD class or SteppingAction cannot change G4Track status, only physics process should do this. In reality, this rule will bring an overhead, because such extra process will need to make extra filtering, so we prefer doing this in user actions, where we check several things. At the same time, your comment is valid, because it is acceptable if SteppingAction may kill a track, why CaloSD is doing this to me not clear. I would think that responsibility for MC truth and to change track status should not be spread between several places - they should be in one place. |
+1 |
PR description:
Make modifications for the HGCal version V18 in the case of mouse bite, guard rings, ...
PR validation:
Using the runTheMatrix test workflows
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Nothing special