-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Set uGMT version used for 2024 in the packers #45180
Set uGMT version used for 2024 in the packers #45180
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45180/40537
|
A new Pull Request was created by @dinyar for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @aloeliger, @epalencia can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cf2a1c/39810/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+l1 |
No idea on the backport, let me get back from the US and ask around and we can let you know |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
The unpacking of quantities in the uGMT unpacker is switched by the firmware version that is written in the raw data. In this PR I updated the firmware version written by the packers so that the repack workflows work as expected.
This might be needed for the central MC production (depending on whether the workflow uses repack), could you let me know if this will require a backport?