Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the run3_data GT in autoCond to the version intended for the 2022, 2023, 2024CDE rereco - 14_0_X #46428

Merged

Conversation

perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Update the run3_data GT in autoCond to 140X_dataRun3_v16, supposed to be the final GT for the 2024CDE re-reco.

Differences with respect to the previous such GT in autoCond are here. In particular:

Backport of #46420

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 17, 2024

A new Pull Request was created by @perrotta for CMSSW_14_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/AlCa (alca)

@atpathak, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @perrotta can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @fabiocos, @missirol, @mmusich, @rsreds, @tocheng, @yuanchao this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 17, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

backport of #46420

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0b513c/42278/summary.html
COMMIT: 08c64f5
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-10-17-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/46428/42278/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found 8 errors in the following unit tests:

---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-pixel_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS
---> test runtestPhysicsToolsPatAlgos had ERRORS
---> test test-runTheMatrix-interactive had ERRORS
and more ...

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test
(Not clear why the unit tests are failing, exceeded time? They are not expected to fail. Let retry)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0b513c/42285/summary.html
COMMIT: 08c64f5
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-10-17-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/46428/42285/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 7 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 3229 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3349412
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 56
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3349336
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 2 / 46 workflows

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

+alca

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 44d79e8 into cms-sw:CMSSW_14_0_X Oct 19, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants