Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kvclient: introduce txnWriteBuffer interceptor #139742

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

arulajmani
Copy link
Collaborator

This patch introduces a new txn interceptor to the TxnCoordSender's interceptor stack -- the txnWriteBuffer. This commit is mostly boilerplate code with some forward looking commentary, so for now, the interceptor is as no-op as it gets. Soon, we'll expand this to actually introduce client side write buffering.

References #139053

Release note: None

@arulajmani arulajmani requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2025 15:54
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Jan 24, 2025

It looks like your PR touches production code but doesn't add or edit any test code. Did you consider adding tests to your PR?

🦉 Hoot! I am a Blathers, a bot for CockroachDB. My owner is dev-inf.

@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Collaborator

@stevendanna stevendanna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It begins!

This patch introduces a new txn interceptor to the TxnCoordSender's
interceptor stack -- the txnWriteBuffer. This commit is mostly
boilerplate code with some forward looking commentary, so for now, the
interceptor is as no-op as it gets. Soon, we'll expand this to actually
introduce client side write buffering.

References cockroachdb#139053

Release note: None
@arulajmani
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TFTR!

bors r=stevendanna

@craig craig bot merged commit 33c93cc into cockroachdb:master Jan 24, 2025
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants