Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NestedFactory: _calculateFees has unused parameter _user #10

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Nov 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

NestedFactory: _calculateFees has unused parameter _user #10

code423n4 opened this issue Nov 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

PierrickGT

Vulnerability details

Impact

In _calculateFees, the parameter _user is passed to the function but never used inside of it.

Proof of Concept

Remove the _user parameter in _calculateFees to gain in code clarity. By removing this parameter, we also need to call the function without passing any address at the following lines:

Recommended Mitigation Steps

The following change is recommended.

function _calculateFees(uint256 _amount) private view returns (uint256) {
    return _amount / 100;
}
@code423n4 code423n4 added 0 (Non-critical) Code style, clarity, syntax, versioning, off-chain monitoring (events etc), exclude gas optimisation bug Something isn't working labels Nov 12, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2021
@maximebrugel maximebrugel added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Nov 17, 2021
@maximebrugel
Copy link
Collaborator

Duplicated : #167

@CloudEllie CloudEllie added 1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments and removed 0 (Non-critical) Code style, clarity, syntax, versioning, off-chain monitoring (events etc), exclude gas optimisation labels Dec 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants