Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NestedRecords: createRecord() can be made internal #124

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

NestedRecords: createRecord() can be made internal #124

code423n4 opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

GreyArt

Vulnerability details

Impact

createRecord() is only invoked by store(). Its visibility can therefore be made internal / private.

Recommended Mitigation Steps

function createRecord(
  uint256 _nftId,
  address _token,
  uint256 _amount,
	address _reserve
) internal onlyFactory {...}
@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) labels Nov 17, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 17, 2021
@maximebrugel maximebrugel added the sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") label Nov 19, 2021
@maximebrugel
Copy link
Collaborator

maximebrugel commented Nov 19, 2021

Will make createRecord internal (or move inside store) and remove redundant checks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants