Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use of deprecated safeApprove #168

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Use of deprecated safeApprove #168

code423n4 opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

WatchPug

Vulnerability details

safeApprove is deprecated.

See: https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/a94cf0509f19292c3edd3e102c025c793c241d05/contracts/token/ERC20/utils/SafeERC20.sol#L38-L44

@code423n4 code423n4 added 0 (Non-critical) Code style, clarity, syntax, versioning, off-chain monitoring (events etc), exclude gas optimisation bug Something isn't working labels Nov 17, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 17, 2021
@maximebrugel maximebrugel added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Nov 18, 2021
@maximebrugel
Copy link
Collaborator

maximebrugel commented Nov 18, 2021

Duplicated : #50

@alcueca alcueca added 1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments invalid This doesn't seem right and removed 0 (Non-critical) Code style, clarity, syntax, versioning, off-chain monitoring (events etc), exclude gas optimisation 1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments invalid This doesn't seem right labels Dec 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants