Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor FeeSplitter::getAmountDue to save one variable slot #68

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Nov 15, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Refactor FeeSplitter::getAmountDue to save one variable slot #68

code423n4 opened this issue Nov 15, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

pmerkleplant

Vulnerability details

Impact

Function getAmountDue in FeeSplitter.sol defines the variable
totalReceived in line 83 eventhough it is already known if the variable is
even necessary.

The variable is uneccessary if _tokenRecords.totalShares == 0.
Not declaring it, if not necessary, saves gas.

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Rewrite the function to something like:

TokenRecords storage _tokenRecords = tokenRecords[address(_token)];
if (_tokenRecords.totalShares == 0) return 0;
uint256 totalReceived = _tokenRecords.totalReleased + _token.balanceOf(address(this));
// Rest same as before
@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) labels Nov 15, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 15, 2021
@adrien-supizet adrien-supizet added the sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") label Nov 19, 2021
@maximebrugel maximebrugel self-assigned this Dec 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants