Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gas Optimizations #24

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Jun 9, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Gas Optimizations #24

code423n4 opened this issue Jun 9, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists G (Gas Optimization)

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Use ++index instead of index++ to increment a loop counter

Context: DiamondLoupeFacet.sol#L27-L36, StableSwapFacet.sol#L393-L454, ConnextPriceOracle.sol#L175-L180, StableSwap.sol#L61-L93, LibDiamond.sol#L95-L118, LibDiamond.sol#L120-L136, LibDiamond.sol#L138-L155, LibDiamond.sol#L157-L167, SwapUtils.sol#L173-L221, SwapUtils.sol#L241-L276 (For both), SwapUtils.sol#L286-L321 (For all three), SwapUtils.sol#L336-L348, SwapUtils.sol#L388-L433 (For both), SwapUtils.sol#L549-L562, SwapUtils.sol#L581-L606, SwapUtils.sol#L817-L898 (For both), SwapUtils.sol#L909-L935, SwapUtils.sol#L986-L1046 (For all three), SwapUtils.sol#L1053-L1062,

Description:
Due to reduced stack operations, using ++index saves 5 gas per iteration.

Recommendation:
Use ++index to increment a loop counter.

Catching The Array Length Prior To Loop

Context: RelayerFacet.sol#L130-L152, StableSwapFacet.sol#L393-L454, ConnextPriceOracle.sol#L175-L180, StableSwap.sol#L61-L93, LibDiamond.sol#L95-L118, LibDiamond.sol#L120-L136, LibDiamond.sol#L138-L155, LibDiamond.sol#L157-L167, SwapUtils.sol#L173-L221, SwapUtils.sol#L549-L562, SwapUtils.sol#L581-L606, SwapUtils.sol#L817-L898 (For both), SwapUtils.sol#L909-L935, SwapUtils.sol#L986-L1046 (For all three), SwapUtils.sol#L1053-L1062

Description:
One can save gas by caching the array length (in stack) and using that set variable in the loop. Replace state variable reads and writes within loops with local variable reads and writes. This is done by assigning state variable values to new local variables, reading and/or writing the local variables in a loop, then after the loop assigning any changed local variables to their equivalent state variables.

Recommendation:
Simply do something like so before the for loop: uint length = variable.length. Then add length in place of variable.length in the for loop.

The Increment In For Loop Post Condition Can Be Made Unchecked

Context: DiamondLoupeFacet.sol#L27-L36, StableSwapFacet.sol#L393-L454, ConnextPriceOracle.sol#L175-L180, StableSwap.sol#L61-L93, LibDiamond.sol#L95-L118, LibDiamond.sol#L120-L136, LibDiamond.sol#L138-L155, LibDiamond.sol#L157-L167, SwapUtils.sol#L173-L221, SwapUtils.sol#L241-L276 (For both), SwapUtils.sol#L286-L321 (For all three), SwapUtils.sol#L336-L348, SwapUtils.sol#L388-L433 (For both), SwapUtils.sol#L549-L562, SwapUtils.sol#L581-L606, SwapUtils.sol#L817-L898 (For both), SwapUtils.sol#L909-L935, SwapUtils.sol#L986-L1046 (For all three), SwapUtils.sol#L1053-L1062

Description:
(This is only relevant if you are using the default solidity checked arithmetic). i++ involves checked arithmetic, which is not required. This is because the value of i is always strictly less than length <= 2**256 - 1. Therefore, the theoretical maximum value of i to enter the for-loop body is 2**256 - 2. This means that the i++ in the for loop can never overflow. Regardless, the overflow checks are performed by the compiler.

Unfortunately, the Solidity optimizer is not smart enough to detect this and remove the checks. One can manually do this by:

for (uint i = 0; i < length; i = unchecked_inc(i)) {
    // do something that doesn't change the value of i
}

function unchecked_inc(uint i) returns (uint) {
    unchecked {
        return i + 1;
    }
}

Note that it’s important that the call to unchecked_inc is inlined. This is only possible for solidity versions starting from 0.8.2.

Recommendation:
The increment in the for loop post condition can be made unchecked.

In require(), Use != 0 Instead of > 0 With Uint Values

Context: ConnextPriceOracle.sol#L142-L156, AmplificationUtils.sol#79-L103 (For L86), LibDiamond.sol#120-L136 (For L121), LibDiamond.sol#138-L155 (For L139), LibDiamond.sol#157-L167 (For L158), LibDiamond.sol#222-L240 (For L226), LibDiamond.sol#L242-L248 (For L247)

Description:
In a require, when checking a uint, using != 0 instead of > 0 saves 6 gas. This will jump over or avoid an extra ISZERO opcode.

Recommendation:
Use != 0 instead of > 0 with uint values but only in require() statements.

Setting The Constructor To Payable

Context: All Contracts

Description:
You can cut out 10 opcodes in the creation-time EVM bytecode if you declare a constructor payable. Making the constructor payable eliminates the need for an initial check of msg.value == 0 and saves 21 gas on deployment with no security risks.

Recommendation:
Set the constructor to payable.

Function Ordering via Method ID

Context: All Contracts

Description:
Contracts most called functions could simply save gas by function ordering via Method ID. Calling a function at runtime will be cheaper if the function is positioned earlier in the order (has a relatively lower Method ID) because 22 gas are added to the cost of a function for every position that came before it. The caller can save on gas if you prioritize most called functions. One could use This tool to help find alternative function names with lower Method IDs while keeping the original name intact.

Recommendation:
Find a lower method ID name for the most called functions for example mostCalled() vs. mostCalled_41q() is cheaper by 44 gas.

@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) labels Jun 9, 2022
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2022
@liu-zhipeng liu-zhipeng added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Jul 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists G (Gas Optimization)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants