Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QA Report #828

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Jan 3, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

QA Report #828

code423n4 opened this issue Jan 3, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-521 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax labels Jan 3, 2023
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2023
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2023
C4-Staff added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 6, 2023
@GalloDaSballo
Copy link

TODO

@c4-judge c4-judge added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge and removed QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax labels Feb 3, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented Feb 3, 2023

GalloDaSballo changed the severity to 2 (Med Risk)

@c4-judge c4-judge closed this as completed Feb 3, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented Feb 3, 2023

GalloDaSballo marked the issue as duplicate of #521

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented Feb 8, 2023

GalloDaSballo marked the issue as satisfactory

@c4-judge c4-judge added the satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards label Feb 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-521 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants