QA Report

[c4-submissions]

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

[141345]

830 SpicyMeatball
l r nc
5 1 0

L 1 r
L 2 l
L 3 l
L 4 l
L 5 l
L 6 i
L 7 i
L 8 d dup of #962
L 9 l

[c4-pre-sort]

141345 marked the issue as sufficient quality report

[alex-ppg]

QA Judgment

The Warden's QA report has been graded B based on a score of 10 combined with a manual review per the relevant QA guideline document located here.

The Warden's submission's score was assessed based on the following accepted findings:

Low-Risk

• On a Linear or Exponential Descending Sale Model, a user that mint on the last block.timestamp mint at an unexpected price. #1275

[c4-judge]

alex-ppg marked the issue as grade-b

[k4zanmalay]

Hey @alex-ppg! I believe L-02 can be a duplicate of the #741. Although the impact in my case is slightly different, "new artist won't be able to sign because artistSigned was already set by the previous artist" the idea behind this issue is the same, admin can set any collection artist as long as collectionTotalSupply == 0.

[alex-ppg]

Hey @k4zanmalay, thanks for flagging this! You are correct, we can consider L-02 as a duplicate of #741 but this would not cause the report to be eligible for an A grade.

All submissions that have been graded as A have a score greater than 20 and the 5 slots for grade A reports have already been filled. Thanks for flagging this regardless!