Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Miscellaneous performance improvements #107

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from
Closed

Miscellaneous performance improvements #107

wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

wismill
Copy link
Collaborator

@wismill wismill commented Feb 17, 2023

I plan to work here on performance.

I may introduce breaking changes when I encounter a discutable design decision.

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature. The key has expired.
doubledup David Dunn
- Fix INLINE pragmas.
- Change the return type of integerValue, in order to deal with
  potential integer overflow.
@wismill wismill force-pushed the wip/perf/misc branch 3 times, most recently from 5b99cc9 to 2112d4f Compare March 10, 2023 13:53
wismill added 6 commits March 10, 2023 15:06
* Reduce script bitmap
* Add scriptShortName
* Add inScript
* Refactor scriptDescription
* Refactor scriptExtensions
* Add ICU comparison
* Do not depends on unicode-data
* Cabal: improve bench options
@wismill
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wismill commented Mar 11, 2023

I got nice performance improvements in general but also some regressions in unicode-data. Some benchmarks are fragile and I will need to test on another machine. I think we should also use sample texts as in unicode-transforms.

Anyway, this PR is getting too big, so I am going to split it in various ones, starting with #109.

@wismill
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wismill commented Jun 14, 2024

FYI, I am working on rebasing & splitting this PR into smaller PR. I will not make the mistake again with a huge PR. Leaving this open while not completely ported.

@wismill wismill mentioned this pull request Jun 18, 2024
@wismill
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wismill commented Jun 20, 2024

So long, big unmergeable PR.

@wismill wismill closed this Jun 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant