Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[graphene]: use shared glib for shared graphene #11265

Merged

Conversation

theartful
Copy link
Contributor

Specify library name and version: graphene

Building shared libraries that depend on static glib causes problems. See #11022.
Last dependency at last!


  • I've read the guidelines for contributing.
  • I've followed the PEP8 style guides for Python code in the recipes.
  • I've used the latest Conan client version.
  • I've tried at least one configuration locally with the conan-center hook activated.

@theartful theartful force-pushed the shared_glib_with_shared_graphene branch from 563aeea to 5e96728 Compare June 18, 2022 20:31
@conan-center-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@conan-center-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@theartful theartful force-pushed the shared_glib_with_shared_graphene branch from 5e96728 to 74185a5 Compare June 19, 2022 12:35
@conan-center-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

All green in build 3 (74185a589aaa0b1aae46971d595de28e4cf89c0c):

  • graphene/1.10.6@:
    All packages built successfully! (All logs)

  • graphene/1.10.4@:
    All packages built successfully! (All logs)

  • graphene/1.10.8@:
    All packages built successfully! (All logs)

  • graphene/1.10.2@:
    All packages built successfully! (All logs)

@conan-center-bot conan-center-bot requested a review from jgsogo June 20, 2022 12:00
@conan-center-bot conan-center-bot merged commit cbd12f4 into conan-io:master Jun 21, 2022
hoxnox pushed a commit to hoxnox/conan-center-index that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants