Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Claim v2 #707

Open
wants to merge 71 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: Claim v2 #707

wants to merge 71 commits into from

Conversation

mauricefisher64
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes in this pull request

Support V2 Claim processing

Checklist

  • This PR represents a single feature, fix, or change.
  • All applicable changes have been documented.
  • [ \x] Any TO DO items (or similar) have been entered as GitHub issues and the link to that issue has been included in a comment.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.36380% with 382 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.03%. Comparing base (3a6a26b) to head (7755368).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
sdk/src/claim.rs 79.49% 114 Missing ⚠️
sdk/src/assertions/ingredient.rs 87.32% 80 Missing ⚠️
sdk/src/assertions/asset_types.rs 6.55% 57 Missing ⚠️
sdk/src/ingredient.rs 82.53% 22 Missing ⚠️
sdk/src/builder.rs 73.91% 12 Missing ⚠️
sdk/src/store.rs 93.75% 12 Missing ⚠️
cli/src/main.rs 8.33% 11 Missing ⚠️
sdk/src/validation_results.rs 92.48% 10 Missing ⚠️
sdk/src/reader.rs 18.18% 9 Missing ⚠️
sdk/src/manifest.rs 82.22% 8 Missing ⚠️
... and 13 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #707      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.82%   79.03%   +0.21%     
==========================================
  Files         141      143       +2     
  Lines       32171    33936    +1765     
==========================================
+ Hits        25358    26821    +1463     
- Misses       6813     7115     +302     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

sdk/src/time_stamp.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/src/time_stamp.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
scouten-adobe added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2024
sdk/src/time_stamp.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cawg_identity/Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cli/src/tree.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
cli/src/tree.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/release-notes.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/usage.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/crypto/src/time_stamp/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/src/assertion.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/src/assertions/actions.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tmathern tmathern self-requested a review January 24, 2025 00:18
docs/usage.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/release-notes.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/usage.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/usage.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/src/claim.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/src/claim.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
}
(box_name.into(), 0)
}

/// Return the label for this assertion given its link
pub fn assertion_label_from_link(assertion_link: &str) -> (String, usize) {
Copy link
Collaborator

@scouten-adobe scouten-adobe Jan 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@scouten-adobe continue review from here (probably tomorrow)

Copy link
Collaborator

@scouten-adobe scouten-adobe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I ran out of time to review – please hold until I can review further.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants