Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

next: new release 35.20211003.1.0 on 2021-10-04 #375

Closed
33 tasks done
lucab opened this issue Sep 21, 2021 · 7 comments
Closed
33 tasks done

next: new release 35.20211003.1.0 on 2021-10-04 #375

lucab opened this issue Sep 21, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@lucab
Copy link
Contributor

lucab commented Sep 21, 2021

First, verify that you meet all the prerequisites

Name this issue next: new release on YYYY-MM-DD with today's date. Once the pipeline spits out the new version ID, you can append it to the title e.g. (31.20191117.2.0).

Pre-release

Promote next-devel changes to next

Build

  • Start a pipeline build (select next, leave all other defaults)
  • Post a link to the jobs as a comment to this issue
  • Wait for the job to finish and succeed
    • x86_64
    • aarch64

Sanity-check the build

Using the the build browser for the next stream:

  • Verify that the parent commit and version match the previous next release (in the future, we'll want to integrate this check in the release job)
    • x86_64
    • aarch64
  • Check kola AWS runs to make sure they didn't fail
    • x86_64
    • aarch64
  • Check kola GCP run to make sure it didn't fail
  • Check kola OpenStack run to make sure it didn't fail

⚠️ Release ⚠️

IMPORTANT: this is the point of no return here. Once the OSTree commit is
imported into the unified repo, any machine that manually runs rpm-ostree upgrade will have the new update.

Run the release job

  • Run the release job, filling in for parameters next and the new version ID
  • Post a link to the job as a comment to this issue
  • Wait for job to finish

At this point, Cincinnati will see the new release on its next refresh and create a corresponding node in the graph without edges pointing to it yet.

Refresh metadata (stream and updates)

From a checkout of this repo:

  • Update stream metadata, by running:
fedora-coreos-stream-generator -releases=https://fcos-builds.s3.amazonaws.com/prod/streams/next/releases.json  -output-file=streams/next.json -pretty-print
  • Add a rollout. For a 48-hour rollout starting at 10 AM ET, run:
./rollout.py add next <version> "10 am ET" 48
  • Commit the changes and open a PR against the repo. Paste the output of make print-rollouts into the PR description.
  • Post a link to the PR as a comment to this issue
  • Wait for the PR to be approved.
  • Once approved, merge it and verify that the sync-stream-metadata job syncs the contents to S3
  • Verify the new version shows up on the download page
  • Verify the incoming edges are showing up in the update graph.
Update graph manual check
curl -H 'Accept: application/json' 'https://updates.coreos.fedoraproject.org/v1/graph?basearch=x86_64&stream=next&rollout_wariness=0'
curl -H 'Accept: application/json' 'https://updates.coreos.fedoraproject.org/v1/graph?basearch=aarch64&stream=next&rollout_wariness=0'

NOTE: In the future, most of these steps will be automated.

Housekeeping

  • If one doesn't already exist, open an issue in this repo for the next release in this stream. Use the approximate date of the release in the title.
  • Issues opened via the previous link will automatically create a linked Jira card. Assign the GitHub issue and Jira card to the next person in the rotation.
@gursewak1997
Copy link
Member

Failed build with process apparently never started in /home/jenkins/agent/workspace/fedora-coreos/fedora-coreos-fedora-coreos-pipeline@tmp/durable-7abe8fcd due to pipeline overload
https://jenkins-fedora-coreos.apps.ocp.ci.centos.org/job/fedora-coreos/job/fedora-coreos-fedora-coreos-pipeline/2890/

@gursewak1997
Copy link
Member

kola OpenStack run: https://jenkins-fedora-coreos.apps.ocp.ci.centos.org/job/kola-openstack/403/
Getting ⚠️ harness.go:1130: Cluster failed starting machines: waiting for instance to run: time limit exceeded
Ignoring since infra is just taking too long for instances to come up

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member

dustymabe commented Oct 6, 2021

Ignoring since infra is just taking too long for instances to come up

👍 - this was under my advice - any tests where the instances came up in time completed tests successfully

@gursewak1997
Copy link
Member

gursewak1997 commented Oct 6, 2021

@gursewak1997 gursewak1997 changed the title next: new release on 2021-10-04 next: new release 35.20211003.1.0 on 2021-10-04 Oct 6, 2021
@gursewak1997
Copy link
Member

gursewak1997 commented Oct 6, 2021

Rollout PR: #382

@gursewak1997
Copy link
Member

Housekeeping: #383

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants