Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[next] tree: promote changes from next-devel at 736eea98bee584c05b094520e8d3d10abc9ea4ec #1258

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2021

Conversation

coreosbot-releng
Copy link

@travier
Copy link
Member

travier commented Oct 4, 2021

@saqibali-2k You should probably try to 'retry' the test job here in the Jenkins UI.

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member

[2021-10-04T14:57:36.690Z] Importing rpm-md...done
[2021-10-04T14:57:36.690Z] rpm-md repo 'coreos-assembler-local-overrides' (cached); generated: 2021-10-04T14:56:51Z solvables: 2
[2021-10-04T14:57:36.690Z] rpm-md repo 'fedora-coreos-pool'; generated: 2021-10-01T21:38:29Z solvables: 20063
[2021-10-04T14:57:36.690Z] error: Couldn't find locked package 'audit-libs-3.0.6-1.fc35.x86_64' (pkgs matching NEVRA: 0; mismatched checksums: 0)

When you see failures like this it could mean the coreos-koji-tagger is not behaving properly.

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member

Yep. Somehow it had lost connection.

2021-10-03 19:25:07,098 ERROR pika.adapters.twisted_connection - connection_lost: ConnectionLost('Connection lost')
2021-10-03 19:25:07,102 WARNING fedora_messaging.twisted.protocol - The connection to the broker was lost (ConnectionLost('Connection lost')), consumer halted; the connection should restart and consuming will resume.

I cycled it and it's running again now. Will circle back here when things are tagged in properly.

@travier
Copy link
Member

travier commented Oct 4, 2021

@saqibali-2k Looks like you triggered the next promote when it was planned that you do the testing one.

@saqibali-2k
Copy link
Member

@saqibali-2k Looks like you triggered the next promote when it was planned that you do the testing one.

Ah shoot, I see it. MB on this everyone. Should I leave this open, or close it and remove the label for now?

@travier
Copy link
Member

travier commented Oct 4, 2021

I think you can just let @gursewak1997 pick up the next steps

@gursewak1997 gursewak1997 merged commit d4af556 into coreos:next Oct 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants