Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

mongodb doesn't enforce uniquenes of annotation/data ids #13

Closed
corot opened this issue Jun 19, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

mongodb doesn't enforce uniquenes of annotation/data ids #13

corot opened this issue Jun 19, 2014 · 2 comments
Labels
bug enhancement

Comments

@corot
Copy link
Owner

corot commented Jun 19, 2014

No description provided.

@corot corot added bug labels Jun 19, 2014
@jihoonl
Copy link
Contributor

jihoonl commented Jun 20, 2014

What does it mean?

@corot
Copy link
Owner Author

corot commented Jun 20, 2014

You can insert two (or more) annotations with the same id, what makes the
db incoherent.

2014-06-20 3:48 GMT+02:00 Jihoon Lee [email protected]:

What does it mean?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#13 (comment).

corot added a commit to corot/warehouse_ros that referenced this issue Jun 21, 2014
@corot
Add kwargs to ensure_index so we can solves issues as
65318b3 
corot/world_canvas#13
corot added a commit to corot/warehouse_ros that referenced this issue Jun 21, 2014
@corot
Add kwargs also to insert so we can solves issues as
cd853fb 
corot/world_canvas#13
corot added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 21, 2014
@corot
Add safe=True keyword to insert so we enforce uniqueness of
c4fa80d 
annotation/data messages (issue #13)
corot added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 21, 2014
@corot
Ensure uniqueness of annotation id (issue #13)
0edc56b
@corot corot closed this as completed Jun 21, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@corot @jihoonl