Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: fix typos (backport #18028) #18031

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2023
Merged

docs: fix typos (backport #18028) #18031

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/architecture/adr-018-extendable-voting-period.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@

## Context

Currently the voting period for all governance proposals is the same. However, this is suboptimal as all governance proposals do not require the same time period. For more non-contentious proposals, they can be dealt with more efficently with a faster period, while more contentious or complex proposals may need a longer period for extended discussion/consideration.
Currently the voting period for all governance proposals is the same. However, this is suboptimal as all governance proposals do not require the same time period. For more non-contentious proposals, they can be dealt with more efficiently with a faster period, while more contentious or complex proposals may need a longer period for extended discussion/consideration.

## Decision

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/architecture/adr-020-protobuf-transaction-encoding.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ We propose that field numbers with bit 11 set (for most use cases this is
the range of 1024-2047) be considered non-critical fields that can safely be
ignored if unknown.

To handle this we will need a unknown field filter that:
To handle this we will need an unknown field filter that:

* always rejects unknown fields in unsigned content (i.e. top-level `Tx` and
unsigned parts of `AuthInfo` if present based on the signing mode)
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/architecture/adr-023-protobuf-naming.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ is used in source code to denote modules, this is often unnecessary for .proto
files as modules are the primary thing sub-packages are used for. Only items which
are known to be used infrequently should have deep sub-package depths.

For the Cosmos SDK, it is recommended that that we simply write `cosmos.bank`,
For the Cosmos SDK, it is recommended that we simply write `cosmos.bank`,
`cosmos.gov`, etc. rather than `cosmos.x.bank`. In practice, most non-module
types can go straight in the `cosmos` package or we can introduce a
`cosmos.base` package if needed. Note that this naming _will not_ change
Expand Down