Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(server/v2): enable pprof #22284

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

feat(server/v2): enable pprof #22284

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt commented Oct 16, 2024

Description

As discussed.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced CPU profiling capabilities for enhanced command execution flow.
    • Users can now enable CPU profiling and specify an output file through a new command flag.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt requested review from hieuvubk and a team as code owners October 16, 2024 19:53
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 16, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request enhances the command execution flow in the server/v2 package by introducing CPU profiling capabilities. A new function wrapCPUProfile is added in commands.go to manage CPU profiling during command execution. The flags.go file consolidates variable declarations and adds a new variable FlagCPUProfiling. Additionally, server.go introduces a new string flag for enabling CPU profiling and specifying an output file.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
server/v2/commands.go Added function wrapCPUProfile(logger log.Logger, v *viper.Viper, callbackFn func() error).
server/v2/flags.go Consolidated variable declarations; added FlagCPUProfiling.
server/v2/server.go Updated StartCmdFlags method to include a new string flag for CPU profiling.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

C:server/v2, backport/v0.52.x

Suggested reviewers

  • kocubinski
  • tac0turtle
  • hieuvubk

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d28659 and a976285.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server/v2/commands.go (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
server/v2/commands.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (4)
server/v2/commands.go (4)

9-9: LGTM: Import statement added correctly

The runtime/pprof import is correctly added and is necessary for the new CPU profiling functionality.


132-134: LGTM: CPU profiling integration

The server.Start(ctx) call is correctly wrapped with the new wrapCPUProfile function, integrating CPU profiling capabilities while maintaining existing functionality and error handling.


146-175: LGTM: CPU profiling implementation

The wrapCPUProfile function is well-implemented:

  • It correctly checks if CPU profiling is enabled.
  • File creation and error handling are properly managed.
  • Resource cleanup is ensured using defer.
  • The callback function is correctly executed and its error is returned.

The previous concern about a potential file descriptor leak has been addressed by closing the file on error (line 162).


146-147: LGTM: Function comment updated

The comment for wrapCPUProfile has been updated to accurately reflect the function's behavior. It no longer mentions executing the callback in a separate goroutine, addressing the previous review comment.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2 label Oct 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@julienrbrt your pull request is missing a changelog!

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
server/v2/flags.go (1)

12-15: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for the new flag.

The changes look good and adhere to the Uber Go Style Guide. The introduction of a var block for multiple variable declarations improves code organization. The naming convention for the new FlagCPUProfiling variable is consistent with the existing pattern.

Consider adding a brief comment for the FlagCPUProfiling variable to explain its purpose, similar to other flags in this file. For example:

var (
	FlagMinGasPrices = prefix("minimum-gas-prices")
	// FlagCPUProfiling specifies the file to write the CPU profile to
	FlagCPUProfiling = prefix("cpu-profile")
)
server/v2/commands.go (1)

169-170: Use appropriate log level for error reporting

When f.Close() fails during the deferred cleanup, logging the error with logger.Info may not sufficiently highlight the issue. Consider using logger.Error to indicate that an error occurred while closing the file.

Apply this diff to adjust the log level:

-    logger.Info("failed to close cpu-profile file", "profile", cpuProfileFile, "err", err.Error())
+    logger.Error("failed to close cpu-profile file", "profile", cpuProfileFile, "err", err.Error())
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8a0244b and 7d28659.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • server/v2/commands.go (3 hunks)
  • server/v2/flags.go (1 hunks)
  • server/v2/server.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
server/v2/commands.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

server/v2/flags.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

server/v2/server.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
server/v2/server.go (1)

184-185: LGTM! Verify flag usage in other parts of the codebase.

The addition of the CPU profiling flag is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objective. The flag follows the existing pattern and has a clear description.

To ensure proper implementation, let's verify if this flag is correctly used in other parts of the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Verified CPU Profiling Flag Usage

The FlagCPUProfiling is consistently utilized across the codebase, ensuring proper enablement and handling of CPU profiling as intended.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of FlagCPUProfiling in other files

# Search for FlagCPUProfiling usage
echo "Searching for FlagCPUProfiling usage:"
rg --type go "FlagCPUProfiling"

# Search for potential CPU profiling related functions
echo "Searching for potential CPU profiling related functions:"
rg --type go "(?i)cpu.*profil"

Length of output: 3021

server/v2/commands.go (1)

132-134: CPU profiling integration is correctly implemented

The server.Start(ctx) function is appropriately wrapped with wrapCPUProfile, enabling CPU profiling when configured. This integration is correctly implemented.

server/v2/commands.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
server/v2/commands.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@hieuvubk
Copy link
Contributor

ack

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 17, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit c905c5e Oct 17, 2024
79 of 80 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the julien/enable-profiling branch October 17, 2024 13:15
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2024
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants