-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
R4R: add various gov cmds to docs and other fixes #2631
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## docs-overhaul #2631 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage ? 58.77%
================================================
Files ? 152
Lines ? 9433
Branches ? 0
================================================
Hits ? 5544
Misses ? 3519
Partials ? 370 |
docs/sdk/cosmos-sdk-cli.md
Outdated
@@ -1,19 +1,18 @@ | |||
# cosmos-sdk-cli | |||
Create a new blockchain project based on cosmos-sdk with a single command. | |||
# cosmos-sdk-cli |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these are the titles that show up in the sidebar, would be good to pretty-fy it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how would you rename it ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm good with the current naming. Having a section named after a specific tool is OK right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
# Cosmos SDK CLI
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A couple of small comments
docs/lite/specification.md
Outdated
@@ -92,12 +92,12 @@ the postition of the target key in the whole key set of this IAVL tree. As shown | |||
out the left key and the right key. If we can demonstrate that both left key and right key | |||
definitely exist, and they are adjacent nodes. Thus the target key definitely doesn't exist. | |||
|
|||
![Absence Proof1](pics/absence1.png) | |||
![Absence Proof1](./pics/absence1.png) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice diagrams!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @fedekunze -- left some minor feedback.
Co-Authored-By: fedekunze <[email protected]>
…osmos-sdk into fedekunze/docs-cli-lite merge develop
Co-Authored-By: fedekunze <[email protected]>
…edekunze/docs-cli-lite merge develop
…osmos-sdk into fedekunze/docs-cli-lite Merge
@cwgoes @zramsay @gamarin2 @jackzampolin anything left for this PR ? I addressed all the comments above |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor comments.
@zramsay do we want to get these fixes merged before we move the docs??? |
doesn't really matter, either way it's a hassle for someone |
LGTM |
Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
Linked to github-issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
Wrote tests
Updated relevant documentation (
docs/
)Added entries in
PENDING.md
with issue #rereviewed
Files changed
in the github PR explorerFor Admin Use: