You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2019. It is now read-only.
It seems like EIP 165 is being worked on to support one of our use cases; to verify that a particular interface is supported. For us, we'd want to verify that the reduce, resolve, and similar methods are supported on an App that is committed to in the state channel
using ERC165Checkerforaddress;
// ....require(myAddress.supportsInterface(InterfaceId_CounterfactualReducer));
Although now that I think about it, I can merge this separately and rebase Bouncer off of that, so that's what I'll do as part of OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts#1145
It seems like EIP 165 is being worked on to support one of our use cases; to verify that a particular interface is supported. For us, we'd want to verify that the
reduce
,resolve
, and similar methods are supported on an App that is committed to in the state channelResources
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: