You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While the ProVerif backend at the moment allows marking items for manual modelling, it does not offer a convenient way to integrate a set of handwritten models after extraction.
To address this, the pv_handwritten attribute should be extended to (optionally) include perhaps a filename where a handwritten model for the given item is specified. This can then be inserted in the extraction in a way that allows automatic replacement of the filename indicator with the handwritten model.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been marked as stale due to a lack of activity for 60 days. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please provide an update or comment to keep it open. Otherwise, it will be closed in 7 days.
While the ProVerif backend at the moment allows marking items for manual modelling, it does not offer a convenient way to integrate a set of handwritten models after extraction.
To address this, the
pv_handwritten
attribute should be extended to (optionally) include perhaps a filename where a handwritten model for the given item is specified. This can then be inserted in the extraction in a way that allows automatic replacement of the filename indicator with the handwritten model.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: