-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
proverif_before!
, proverif_after!
, proverif_replace!
are not working
#620
Comments
This issue has been marked as stale due to a lack of activity for 60 days. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please provide an update or comment to keep it open. Otherwise, it will be closed in 7 days. |
Need to look into the necessary changes a bit more, but should address this, since it would be good to have e.g. when addressing cryspen/bertie#116. |
This issue has been marked as stale due to a lack of activity for 60 days. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please provide an update or comment to keep it open. Otherwise, it will be closed in 7 days. |
This issue has been closed due to a lack of activity since being marked as stale. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please reopen it with an update or comment. |
This was closed by #1023 E.g. https://hax-playground.cryspen.com/#pro-verif/63432cffd5/gist=5413937cec1e6e6fba3e0de344f302c1 |
PR #614 adds support for new ways of inlining backend code within Rust.
In the ProVerif backend, certain kinds of items (e.g. Fn vs Type) are outputted in different parts of the output pv files.
I suspect we need to add a
proverif_options
field toItemQuote
to allow the user to place the item. Or maybe we should just inherit the position of the item the attribute was on?@jschneider-bensch what do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: