Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Full metadata upsert #290

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

fix: Full metadata upsert #290

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

adityachoudhari26
Copy link
Contributor

@adityachoudhari26 adityachoudhari26 commented Jan 23, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced resource metadata handling by adopting a delete-then-insert strategy for managing resource metadata entries.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes modify the insertResourceMetadata function in the resource metadata insertion process. The previous implementation used an upsert strategy with conflict resolution based on key and resource ID. The new approach first deletes existing resource metadata entries for specific resource IDs, then performs a straightforward insertion of new metadata values. This represents a shift from a conflict-handling upsert method to a delete-then-insert approach.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/job-dispatch/src/resource/insert-resource-metadata.ts Replaced upsert logic with a delete-then-insert strategy for resource metadata. Introduced preliminary deletion of existing entries using notInArray before inserting new metadata values.

Poem

🐰 Metadata dance, a rabbit's delight,
Delete first, then insert with might!
Old upserts fade, new logic takes flight,
Resource entries reset, clean and bright,
A coding hop that feels just right! 🔍

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/job-dispatch/src/resource/insert-resource-metadata.ts (1)

3-3: Consider using native Set for uniqueness instead of Lodash.

Since you're only using _.uniq once, you can replace it with a native JavaScript Set to reduce dependencies.

Suggested change:

- import _ from "lodash";
...
- const resourceIds = _.uniq(resourceMetadataValues.map((r) => r.resourceId));
+ const resourceIds = [...new Set(resourceMetadataValues.map((r) => r.resourceId))];
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b059b8 and b66c160.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/job-dispatch/src/resource/insert-resource-metadata.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
packages/job-dispatch/src/resource/insert-resource-metadata.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Lint
  • GitHub Check: build (linux/amd64)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/job-dispatch/src/resource/insert-resource-metadata.ts (1)

26-30: Verified atomic replacement of resource metadata within a transaction.

The delete-then-insert approach wrapped in the transaction tx ensures that all existing metadata for the specified resource IDs is fully replaced with the new metadata in an atomic operation, maintaining data integrity and consistency.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/job-dispatch/src/resource/insert-resource-metadata.ts (2)

32-45: Consider optimizing the deletion logic for large datasets.

The current implementation using _.chain() and array operations might impact performance with large metadata sets. Consider:

  1. Using SQL's NOT IN directly if supported by your ORM
  2. Batching deletions for large datasets

Example optimization:

// Direct SQL approach (if supported)
await tx.delete(schema.resourceMetadata)
  .where(
    sql`(resourceId, key) NOT IN (${resourceMetadataValues.map(v => 
      `(${v.resourceId}, ${v.key})`
    ).join(',')})`
  );

Line range hint 44-53: Consider adding explicit error handling.

While the Promise chain implicitly handles errors, consider adding explicit error handling to:

  1. Ensure atomicity between delete and insert operations
  2. Provide specific error messages for different failure scenarios

Example enhancement:

try {
  await tx.delete(schema.resourceMetadata).where(or(...deletedKeysChecks));
  return await tx
    .insert(schema.resourceMetadata)
    .values(resourceMetadataValues)
    .onConflictDoUpdate({
      target: [schema.resourceMetadata.key, schema.resourceMetadata.resourceId],
      set: buildConflictUpdateColumns(schema.resourceMetadata, ["value"]),
    });
} catch (error) {
  // Log specific error details
  throw new Error(`Failed to update resource metadata: ${error.message}`);
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b66c160 and 0cbafb1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/job-dispatch/src/resource/insert-resource-metadata.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
packages/job-dispatch/src/resource/insert-resource-metadata.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Note on Error Handling:
Avoid strict enforcement of try/catch blocks. Code may use early returns, Promise chains (.then().catch()), or other patterns for error handling. These are acceptable as long as they maintain clarity and predictability.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: Typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Lint
  • GitHub Check: build (linux/amd64)
  • GitHub Check: Format
  • GitHub Check: build (linux/amd64)
  • GitHub Check: build (linux/amd64)
  • GitHub Check: build (linux/amd64)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/job-dispatch/src/resource/insert-resource-metadata.ts (2)

3-11: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate.

The new imports (lodash and notInArray) are necessary for implementing the new deletion logic.


32-42: LGTM: Clean implementation of metadata cleanup logic.

The grouping and filtering logic effectively identifies obsolete metadata entries for deletion.

Please verify the transaction isolation level to ensure consistency between delete and insert operations:

✅ Verification successful

Transaction handling verified: Implementation ensures data consistency

The code correctly uses a shared transaction object for both delete and insert operations, guaranteeing atomicity. The transaction management is properly handled at the caller level through dependency injection.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for transaction configuration
rg -A 5 "BEGIN TRANSACTION|startTransaction|isolation" 

Length of output: 555


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for database operations in the metadata file
ast-grep --pattern 'await $$$.$$$($$$)' packages/job-dispatch/src/resource/insert-resource-metadata.ts

# Also check for database client initialization
rg -l "knex|prisma|typeorm|sequelize" packages/job-dispatch/src/resource/

Length of output: 322


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete file content to see function signature and context
cat packages/job-dispatch/src/resource/insert-resource-metadata.ts

# Find where this function is called
rg -l "insertResourceMetadata" packages/job-dispatch/src/

Length of output: 1718

@adityachoudhari26 adityachoudhari26 merged commit 2957560 into main Jan 23, 2025
10 checks passed
@adityachoudhari26 adityachoudhari26 deleted the full-metadata-upsrt branch January 23, 2025 18:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants