Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support rich object as argument to snippet actions #1324

Closed
pokey opened this issue Mar 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1329
Closed

Support rich object as argument to snippet actions #1324

pokey opened this issue Mar 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1329
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@pokey
Copy link
Member

pokey commented Mar 19, 2023

Something like the following for wrap:

interface NamedSnippet {
  type: "named";
  name: string;
  variableName: string;
}
interface CustomSnippet {
  type: "custom";
  body: string;
  variableName?: string;
  scopeType?: ScopeType;
}
type SnippetDescription = NamedSnippet | CustomSnippet;

async run(
    [targets]: [Target[]],
    snippet: SnippetDescription,
  ): Promise<ActionReturnValue> {}

insert should be similar but no variableName

@pokey pokey added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 19, 2023
@pokey pokey added this to the Short list milestone Mar 19, 2023
@pokey pokey self-assigned this Mar 20, 2023
@pokey pokey changed the title Support rich object to snippet action Support rich object as argument to snippet action Mar 20, 2023
@pokey pokey changed the title Support rich object as argument to snippet action Support rich object as argument to snippet actions Mar 20, 2023
@pokey pokey closed this as completed in 94bab18 Mar 27, 2023
cursorless-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 27, 2023
- Fixes #1324
- Fixes #1325 

Note that I created a Talon-side insertion api that supports the full
set of options, including substitutions, targets, and scopes, but
decided to leave it out for now because I'm not sure exactly how it
should look and we don't need it for the mathfly support we're planning
to use it for. In particular, we should probably figure out #803 before
we implement the more complex api because snippets really want a
destination, not a target. I did use the complex Talon-side api to
record some tests of the extension api, though

Here is the complex Talon snippet insertion api in case useful at some
point

<details><summary>Complex talon api</summary>

```diff
From e39e03e3a06a6db4f1edb245a5225037d0ea08d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pokey Rule <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:22:40 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Complex insert snippet Talon api

---
 cursorless-talon/src/snippets.py | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cursorless-talon/src/snippets.py b/cursorless-talon/src/snippets.py
index a9f100f58..409512011 100644
--- a/cursorless-talon/src/snippets.py
+++ b/cursorless-talon/src/snippets.py
@@ -91,15 +91,34 @@ class Actions:
             },
         )
 
-    def cursorless_insert_snippet(body: str):
+    def cursorless_insert_snippet(
+        body: str,
+        target: Optional[dict] = None,
+        scope: Optional[str] = None,
+        snippet_variable: Optional[str] = None,
+        text: Optional[str] = None,
+    ):
         """Inserts a custom snippet"""
-        actions.user.cursorless_implicit_target_command(
-            "insertSnippet",
-            {
-                "type": "custom",
-                "body": body,
-            },
-        )
+        snippet_arg: dict[str, Any] = {
+            "type": "custom",
+            "body": body,
+        }
+        if scope:
+            snippet_arg["scopeType"] = {"type": scope}
+        if snippet_variable:
+            snippet_arg["substitutions"] = {snippet_variable: text}
+
+        if target:
+            actions.user.cursorless_single_target_command_with_arg_list(
+                "insertSnippet",
+                target,
+                [snippet_arg],
+            )
+        else:
+            actions.user.cursorless_implicit_target_command(
+                "insertSnippet",
+                snippet_arg,
+            )
 
     def cursorless_wrap_with_snippet_by_name(
         name: str, variable_name: str, target: dict
-- 
2.39.2

```

</details>

## Checklist

- [x] I have added
[tests](https://www.cursorless.org/docs/contributing/test-case-recorder/)
- [x] I have updated the
[docs](https://github.com/cursorless-dev/cursorless/tree/main/docs) and
[cheatsheet](https://github.com/cursorless-dev/cursorless/tree/main/cursorless-talon/src/cheatsheet)
- [x] I have not broken the cheatsheet
thetomcraig-aya pushed a commit to thetomcraig/cursorless that referenced this issue Mar 27, 2024
- Fixes cursorless-dev#1324
- Fixes cursorless-dev#1325 

Note that I created a Talon-side insertion api that supports the full
set of options, including substitutions, targets, and scopes, but
decided to leave it out for now because I'm not sure exactly how it
should look and we don't need it for the mathfly support we're planning
to use it for. In particular, we should probably figure out cursorless-dev#803 before
we implement the more complex api because snippets really want a
destination, not a target. I did use the complex Talon-side api to
record some tests of the extension api, though

Here is the complex Talon snippet insertion api in case useful at some
point

<details><summary>Complex talon api</summary>

```diff
From e39e03e3a06a6db4f1edb245a5225037d0ea08d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pokey Rule <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:22:40 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Complex insert snippet Talon api

---
 cursorless-talon/src/snippets.py | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cursorless-talon/src/snippets.py b/cursorless-talon/src/snippets.py
index a9f100f58..409512011 100644
--- a/cursorless-talon/src/snippets.py
+++ b/cursorless-talon/src/snippets.py
@@ -91,15 +91,34 @@ class Actions:
             },
         )
 
-    def cursorless_insert_snippet(body: str):
+    def cursorless_insert_snippet(
+        body: str,
+        target: Optional[dict] = None,
+        scope: Optional[str] = None,
+        snippet_variable: Optional[str] = None,
+        text: Optional[str] = None,
+    ):
         """Inserts a custom snippet"""
-        actions.user.cursorless_implicit_target_command(
-            "insertSnippet",
-            {
-                "type": "custom",
-                "body": body,
-            },
-        )
+        snippet_arg: dict[str, Any] = {
+            "type": "custom",
+            "body": body,
+        }
+        if scope:
+            snippet_arg["scopeType"] = {"type": scope}
+        if snippet_variable:
+            snippet_arg["substitutions"] = {snippet_variable: text}
+
+        if target:
+            actions.user.cursorless_single_target_command_with_arg_list(
+                "insertSnippet",
+                target,
+                [snippet_arg],
+            )
+        else:
+            actions.user.cursorless_implicit_target_command(
+                "insertSnippet",
+                snippet_arg,
+            )
 
     def cursorless_wrap_with_snippet_by_name(
         name: str, variable_name: str, target: dict
-- 
2.39.2

```

</details>

## Checklist

- [x] I have added
[tests](https://www.cursorless.org/docs/contributing/test-case-recorder/)
- [x] I have updated the
[docs](https://github.com/cursorless-dev/cursorless/tree/main/docs) and
[cheatsheet](https://github.com/cursorless-dev/cursorless/tree/main/cursorless-talon/src/cheatsheet)
- [x] I have not broken the cheatsheet
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant