-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/adding better support for php 8.2 #65
base: 2.X
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Feature/adding better support for php 8.2 #65
Conversation
…erties in test classes.
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ | |||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since you add return types, you should also update the part of the composer.json file where the PHP version is defined, because you drop the support for PHP 5.x which is also mentionned in the README.md :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure thing, thanks for the review :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, Eric. I have updated the PR, dropping the support for php 5.x. Now, the minimum is 7.x, while the latest version of php and dev requirement libs are also supported for the most up-to-date users. Please let me know if there's something else I can do. Thanks again.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@danielgsims is your package stil maintained :) ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since it is not marked as abandoned, can we consider merging the PR regardlessly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well I am not a maintainer of this repo, so... :/
renaming package
@danielgsims @zkucekovic @ecourtial since I saw no more feedback from Daniel, I believe this package is abandoned? I took the liberty to create my own based on Daniel's idea. You guys feel free to use and of course contribute. |
No description provided.