Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(platform)!: identity update can not disable a key it is also adding #1772

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Mar 14, 2024

Conversation

QuantumExplorer
Copy link
Member

@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer commented Mar 14, 2024

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

What was done?

Before this PR we could both add and disable the same key in an identity update.

How Has This Been Tested?

Untested, but also trivial.

Breaking Changes

Slightly breaking, as we are changing consensus validation rules.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have added "!" to the title and described breaking changes in the corresponding section if my code contains any
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if needed

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer changed the title feat(platform)!:better identity update feat(platform)!: identity update can not disable a key it is also adding Mar 14, 2024
Copy link
Member

@shumkov shumkov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer merged commit 825d963 into v1.0-dev Mar 14, 2024
69 of 70 checks passed
@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer deleted the feat/betterIdentityUpdate branch March 14, 2024 07:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants