Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(browse): Improving Browse Feature Performance #6073

Merged

Conversation

jjoyce0510
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

In this PR, we improve the browse feature performance via 2 changes:

  1. Remove wasteful, unnecessary aggregations performed in our browse query to elastic search.
  2. Add a browse path cache to make subsequent traversals painless.

These improvements will especially be noticeable at scale!

Summary

Ready for review.

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

@github-actions
Copy link

Unit Test Results (build & test)

584 tests  ±0   580 ✔️ ±0   12m 59s ⏱️ -52s
143 suites ±0       4 💤 ±0 
143 files   ±0       0 ±0 

Results for commit 2b15be2. ± Comparison against base commit 3b9e979.

/**
* Returns cached browse results.
*/
public BrowseResult getCachedBrowseResults(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great

@jjoyce0510 jjoyce0510 merged commit 09dec1a into datahub-project:master Sep 28, 2022
shirshanka pushed a commit to shirshanka/datahub that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants